hey liberals heres your hero alan grayson in his true colors

Hey Liberals. Here’s Your Hero, Alan Grayson, In His True Colors

October 27th, 2009 By: Michael Merritt
| Tags:

Alan_GraysonThis is too funny:

Republicans and Democrats slammed Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) for calling Linda Robertson, an adviser to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, a “K Street whore” in a month-old radio interview that circulated on Capitol Hill Monday night.

Now his colleagues in Congress are finally beginning to throw him under the bus:

“Is this news to you that this guy’s one fry short of a Happy Meal?” asked Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.)

House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer defended Robertson, whom he said he knows.

“I think it’s inappropriate and unfair,” the Maryland Democrat said. He decried the “heated rhetoric” that he said interferes with the ability solve problems.

It took long enough.  I mean, they had to wait for a comment disparaging a woman before speaking out?  As if “die quickly” wasn’t enough of a red alarm.

Share and Enjoy:

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn’t support JavaScript, or they didn’t load fast enough.


  1. Bill

    October 27th, 2009 at 09:07

    Reply |
    Quote |
    #1

    Sometimes heated rhetoric is a well meaning persons worst enemy. There are so many schills for big money on capitol hill that even though Linda Robertson may be as described a politician is a target and will be held accountable for every slip. I tend to believe the man as he is calling every money sucking asshole out and is paying the price. People only scream when their horse is being gored.


  2. Doomed

    October 27th, 2009 at 13:17

    Reply |
    Quote |
    #2

    I said a month ago that the democrat leadership were bemoaning in public how they had no front man. No pit bull. During the Iraq war demonization they had John Murtha who was willing to stand up and proclaim daily, almost hourly how evil the Bush Administration was.

    Two days after this public outcry Mr. Grayson shows up. Michael Moore showed up and Moveon.org showed up to join the battle.

    Just as everything coming out of Rush Limbaughs mouth is exactly HOW the GOP sees it and how they feel……

    So too is exactly how the Democrats see it and feel coming from Mr. Graysons mouth. After all he was sent out to be the pit bull for the Democrats.

    Basically the Democrats think women in business are WHORES. Huh Mr. Grayson? Isnt that what you mean?

    What thats not what he means….The democrats dont believe that? Could it be that he didnt mean that other stuff either….you know like GOP wants you to die? Or maybe he did mean it…

    Which is it Democrats? Both or neither?


  3. Michael Merritt

    October 28th, 2009 at 01:14

    Reply |
    Quote |
    #3

    People only scream when their horse is being gored.

    I don’t speak for Robertson, or whatever party she may belong to, nor for the Republicans. I do speak against inappropriateness like Grayson’s, though.


  4. Paul D.

    October 28th, 2009 at 03:14

    Reply |
    Quote |
    #4

    (*NO, WE WON’T HAVE THAT* – Ed.) Defending Enron lobbyists is almost as despicable as being a republican. Maybe people forgot the thousands of hard working Enron Americans who lost their retirement and savings because of people like Linda Robertson. Actually, now that I think about it, most of us HAVE lost over 50% of our retirement savings in the latest BANKING SCAM which almost caused our economy to collapse… oh what’s that? Linda’s now an adviser to bankers? It seems like wherever she goes, people lose their savings and retirement.

Comments are closed.

PoliGazette Comments Policy


PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.


(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others’ comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.


(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.


(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.


(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others’ words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter’s own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.


(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. “Obama is a Muslim”) or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.


Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.