PG Analysis

Update: October 13th, 2008

Welcome to PoliGazette, the right-of-center news and opinion site. On this frontpage you can read the latest essays, original reports and comprehensive analyses. For the blog, which is updated throughout the day, go here.

INTERNATIONAL

Russia’s Perspective
PoliGazette takes a look at the Russia / U.S. crisis from a Russian perspective. Much has been written in recent weeks from a Georgian and Western perspective, but commentators all too often forget to explain that Russia’s invasion did not, from its own perspective, come out of the blue.
Michael van der Galien explains that Russia’s invasion of neighboring Georgia was a reaction to America crawling to Russia’s borders; former Soviet Republics are increasinly democratizing and the United States is a strong proponent of having many of them join NATO, the alliance created to contain Russia.

The Comeback of Extremists in Turkey
Reporting from Istanbul, Turkey, Michael van der Galien notices that the landscape has changed considerably in only one year time; where few Turkish women covered themselves up completely in 2007, one can now see many women dressed entirely in black, covering everything except for their eyes.
Quite some of those women are from Iran. They are not citizens of Turkey; they only visit it during summer break. In Iran, television is censored to an unimaginable degree, but the Iranian leaders allow their subjects to watch some foreign shows, many of which from Turkey. These women watch the shows, are interested in what Turkey really looks like, get on a plane, and find out for themselves what a secular Muslim state can look like.
Others, however, are Turkish. The Justice and Development Party’s (AK Parti) power seems to change Turkey rather rapidly.

NATIONAL

Obama and Free Speech
PoliGazette takes a closer look at efforts by the Obama campaign and its supporters to stifle critics using mob tactics and even the power of the state. These efforts are beginning to raise serious concerns about what the stature of free speech would be under an Obama administration. Even for those who are generally sympathetic to Obama’s campaign, this is a matter for dread. Even if Obama himself is not directly involved in efforts for ideological repression, the kind of people who would be empowered in an Obama administration are increasingly showing exposing their draconian plans for stifling dissent.
 

Misreading the Culture Wars
Many anti-conservatives think they have found a winner with their continuing casting of 17-year-old Bristol Palin, daughter of Governor Sarah Palin, as the dispositive indicator of “hypocrisy” on the part of social conservatives. To them, if any social conservative OR any member of his or her family or group of friends is anything less than morally perfect, then that is proof of “hypocrisy” to be trumpeted from the rooftops with an assured smugness that only those who actually DO believe themselves to be morally perfect can muster.
Jason Steck, managing editor, explains that the problem with the above is that in their rush to preen themselves and hate conservatives (yet again), they read social conservatives exactly wrong.

Libertarians for Palin
Although Sarah Palin is often depicted as a staunch social conservative, who is independent - almost a maverick - on other issues, one could certainly defend the thesis that she is the best running mate, or nominee for the presidency even, libertarians have had in decades.
She is a social conservative, without being aggressive about. She is a Christian conservative, but not one who condemns others to hellfire if they do not live according to her values, let alone to punishment by the government. She is a supporter of the free market, and is willing to take on the establishment standing in the way of private citizens trying to improve their lives. When it comes to health care and education too, she is someone libertarians could support.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
No comments yet.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.