Is There Hope for Europe? - Guest Post Jules Crittenden

December 5th, 2007 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The second special guest blogger of launch week is Jules Crittenden. Is there hope for Europe?

Two, once-powerful, anti-Americans

America had de Tocqueville. Europe has O’Rourke. His classic “Among the Euro-weenies” from 1986, after the US air attacks on Libya, holds up well despite the passage of two decades, and America’s intervening gift of freedom from Soviet tyranny. Like d’Tocqueville, O’Rourke’s insights as a foreigner tell us much both about the character of Europe and that of America. I quote liberally here, but encourage all students of US-European relations to read the whole thing, in O’Rourke’s “Holiday in Hell” anthology:

I’ve been over here for one gray, dank spring month now, and I think I can tell you why everyone with an IQ bigger than his hat size hit the beach at Ellis Island. Say what you want about “land of opportunity” and “purpled mountains majesty above the fruited plain.,” our forebears moved to the United States because they were sick to death of lukewarm beer — and lukewarm coffee and lukewarm bathwater and lukewarm mystery cutlets with mucky-colored mushroom cheese junk on them. Everything in Europe is lukewarm except the radiators…

I’ve had it with these dopey little countries and all their poky borders. You can’t swing a cat without sending it through customs … even the languages are itty-bitty. Sometimes you need two or three just to get you through lunch.

It’s not like the Europeans have been very nice hosts either. The whole month here has been one long shower of shit about America, just because we took a punch at the Libyans. There were huge demonstrations in Germany, Italy and Spain. In West Berlin, twenty thousand young bucketheads turned out. In Barcelona a group of protestors vented their fury on that symbol of American imperialism, a McDonald’s. In London thousands of peacemongers blocked the main shopping thoroughfare of Oxford Street, staging sitdown strikes and throwing bottles at the police … In Belgium, a friend of mine was stopped on the street by a policeman and told he should be ashamed to be an American.

What I didn’t understand, I said, was the emotional intensity of the demonstrations. Big civilized countries have been launching punitive raids on weedy little native powers since … well, at least since the Redcoats shot up Lexington and Concord.

Meg (Beresford, secretary general of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament) said that when the F-111s were launched from English soil, the British realized for the first time what “what those bases were for.”

This made the British sound a little thick.

Meg claimed that the attempt to kill Qaddafi himself had upset people, “like watching one of those John Wayne movies.”

When a European mentions John Wayne, you know you’re going to get an earful.

Meg admitted there was “resentment at American culture.” She said, “Western democracies feel there is nothing immoral about spreading that kind of system, spreading Western-style democracy.” She paused. “McDonald’s everywhere.”

Finally, an exasperated O’Rourke upon hearing American foreign policy again compared to …

“A John Wayne movie,” I said. “That’s what you were going to say, wasn’t it? We think war is a John Wayne movie. We think life is a John Wayne movie — with good guys, bad guys, as simple as that. Well, you know somethig, Mister Limey Poofter? You’re right. And let me tell you who those bad guys are. They’re us. WE BE BAD.

“We’re the baddest-assed sons of bitches that ever jogged in Reeboks. We’re three-quarters grizzly bear and two-thirds car wreck and descended from a stock market crash on our mother’s side. You take your Germany, France, and Spain , roll them all together and it wouldn’t give us room to park our cars. We’re the big boys, Jack, the original, giant, economy-sized, new and improved butt-kickers of all time. When we snort coke in Houston, people lose their hats in Cap d’Antibes. And we’ve got an American Express card credit limit higher than your piss-ant metric numbers go.

“You say our country’s never been invaded? You’re right, little buddy. Because I’d like to see the needle-dicked foreigners who’d have the guts to try. We drink napalm to get our hearts started in the morning. A rape and a mugging is our way of saying Cheerio. Hell can’t hold our sock-hops. We walk taller, talk louder, spit further, fuck longer and buy more things than you know the names of. I’d rather be a junkie in a New York City jail than king, queen and jack of all you Europeans. We eat little countries like this for breakfast and shit them out for lunch.”

Of course, the guy should have punched me. But this was Europe. He just smiled his shabby, superior European smile. (God, don’t these people have dentists?)

Harsh words? Regrettably short on tact and political correctness, maybe. A mirror can be a blunt instrument, but in any case, it hardly seems fair that the rest of the world should be entitled to insult all that is American without getting some of it back once in a while. You really need to read the whole thing. I assume, at places such as the American Studies program at Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, for example, there must be entire courses devoted to the study of O’Rourke along with the d’Tocqueville, Mark Twain, H.L. Mencken and John Belushi courses. You do have Belushi courses, don’t you?

A lot has changed since O’Rourke — my neighbor over the state line in “Live Free or Die” New Hampshire, just 70 miles away, next door in American terms — wrote those words, but some things remain the same. Why, it was just last month that my good host at this site, my dear clog-hopping, dike-plugging Dutch friend Michael van der Galien, invoked the term “Cowboy Diplomacy.”

Americans are nothing if not optimistic, however, and in young, forward-thinking Europeans such as van der Galien, despite his insistence on Euro-style moderation, I see a glimmering of hope for your continent. Van der Galien is among those who have recognized that, love America or hate her, there are greater evils in the world and America is leading the fight against them. Europeans like Barcepundit, a bright point of light in capitulist Spain, and the magnificent and most Dissident Frogman, who refuses to limit his range of expression to the Gallic shrug.

Sometimes parents must learn from their children. Europe in fact gave birth to many of the ideas of freedom that were brought to maturation in America, and it is gratifying to see glimmerings of recognition of what freedom is … freedom from diaper-to-crutches support of onerous government, for example … and the responsibilities that come with it, as well as the notion that it might be worth fighting for, even on behalf of others.

European socialism has been under attack for more than two decades, starting with Margaret Thatcher at the time O’Rourke was writing, continuing with Nicholas Sarkozy today. Britain, Italy and Spain at one time stood with America in the liberation of Iraq. The British and the Dutch, with minor non-combat roles by France and Germany, are in the field in Afghanistan.

It could be, despite being cramped by history as well as custom and real estate, that Europe is in fact on the way to becoming a modern, responsible entity, a practical force for good in the world, rather than an overprivileged peanut gallery.

A means of jump-starting this process is readily available. In Iraq, there are millions of people yearning to join the community of free, prosperous, secure nations. America and a handful of allies have brought them part of the way there. Europe, with its cynical support for Saddam Hussein and the unwillingness of so many to do anything to correct that wrong, is in no small part responsible for the plight of those people. Now, with the United States having set the terms for success in Iraq, it is not too late for those in Europe who have hung back or abandoned Iraq to belatedly come to Iraq’s aid.

Send in your combat troops. Send in your businessmen. Show the Iraqi people and the world that you care by doing something more than griping. Recognize that to build something good like freedom, you must bleed. Atone a little for that wretched history of colonialism that built so much of Europe. Some people will hate you, but as you may have noticed, they already do. It might hurt at first, but you will begin to feel better. You will feel bigger. You will know you are doing everything you can to make this world a better place. You will begin to understand what it is like to be an American.

Jules Crittenden blogs at Forward Movement

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Xel
    December 5th, 2007 at 13:29
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Roll on the next special guest blogger; this left me lukewarm.

  2. Jonathan
    December 5th, 2007 at 14:47
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Far from lukewarm, always refreshing to rehash O’Rourke’s insights. Crittendon offers a credible solution for Europe’s action-by-rhetoric policies.

    Europe has been sitting on the sidelines for decades, wanting to be taken seriously but never having the will or confidence to commit themselves to any endeavor that is not Euro-centric.

    The sanctimony from France, Germany et al. has become a whining, a child-like tantrum worthy of small nations. As the author said; to do more than griping, get some boots on the ground even if it is only an army of businessmen headed to Iraq to help invest in the possibility of a free and democratic government. It won’t be popular to help out in this “American” adventure, but again, as Mr. Crittendon put it; “You will feel bigger. You will know you are doing everything you can to make this world a better place. You will begin to understand what it is like to be an American.”

  3. Kevin
    December 5th, 2007 at 14:52
    Reply | Quote | #3

    It made me laugh out loud. To each his own, I guess.

  4. C Stanley
    December 5th, 2007 at 15:04
    Reply | Quote | #4

    I found it funny (predictable, but funny) to contrast the two styles of Dave Schuler and Jules Crittendon. Both turned the tables on Michael by writing about Europe from an American perspective, but Jules wants to roast the “Euroweenies” while Dave politely invites them to dip into the melting pot.

  5. Xel
    December 5th, 2007 at 15:53
    Reply | Quote | #5

    “Far from lukewarm, always refreshing to rehash O’Rourke’s insights.”

    I guess a stream of anecdotal, nagging, generalizing grumpy-old-wisecracker urine can be refreshing. Doesn’t mean that’s the liquid I want to shower in.

    “Europe has been sitting on the sidelines for decades, wanting to be taken seriously but never having the will or confidence to commit themselves to any endeavor that is not Euro-centric.”

    Sure. “Walk-the-walk as well as talk the talk”. I think the entire column could only consist of that and it would be just as useful to people.

    “As the author said; to do more than griping, get some boots on the ground even if it is only an army of businessmen headed to Iraq to help invest in the possibility of a free and democratic government.”

    Nope, the invasion was not justified and even if it was it was illegally and immorally negligent of what any invaded population deserves. However, once the US has already screwed things up it might be humanitarian/ethical to get in there to prevent bloodshed. However, as long as an invasion is launched on such shaky ground it could be careless to anger muslims at home by joining an invasion that - still - can only really be seen as barbaric. I guess if the US cleaned up the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan it would be acceptable to join in. Before that, you are helping contractors and excusing grave incompetence while (maybe) helping Iraqis, and that won’t fly.

    “It won’t be popular to help out in this “American” adventure, but again, as Mr. Crittendon put it; “You will feel bigger. You will know you are doing everything you can to make this world a better place. You will begin to understand what it is like to be an American.””

    It *IS* a predominantly American adventure. And it is a petty affair, nothing genuinely impressive, at its core. It is a good thing to help the Iraqis, but Operation Iraqi Freedom has not made the world a better place, but it would have if John Q actually had demanded more than fancy words and self-aggrandizing.

  6. RebeccaH
    December 5th, 2007 at 16:34
    Reply | Quote | #6

    On the other hand, it’s incredibly uncomfortable to give up one’s cherished prejudices… and perhaps “carelessly angering Muslims at home”, knowing their predilections.

  7. Xel
    December 5th, 2007 at 16:49
    Reply | Quote | #7

    “On the other hand, it’s incredibly uncomfortable to give up one’s cherished prejudices… and perhaps “carelessly angering Muslims at home”, knowing their predilections.”

    There is nothing irrational in being angered by a nation harming your coreligionists because it did not care about planning the damn invasion.

    There is nothing irrational about being angry over the unwillingness of anyone to act as an adult and really clean up the invasion’s incompetence, waste, disrespect, breaches of international law etc.

    There is nothing irrational about being upset if your country decides to jump in and obey the original invader despite its ongoing immoral behaviour even if one protects these coreligionists - if it weren’t for the original invader (which, by the way, starved many many many many many of your coreligionists to death just to send some kind of message) your coreligionists wouldn’t need any protection.

    There is nothing irrational about demanding that the original invader shows *some* semblance of *genuine*, total respect and care for your kin before your own country gives the invader’s mission credibility, support and implied justification.

    I am not prejudiced towards the US here: I call what I see. I am not accusing muslims who demand antagonism towards the US right now of any irrationality or bad faith, nor am I implying that people, including muslims, should be heeded in case their anger is irrational or takes unethical expressions.

  8. Lynx
    December 5th, 2007 at 17:31
    Reply | Quote | #8

    Michael, you may be impressed with this piece of hyper-prejudiced trash, but I am not. “In the mirror” indeed. It’s true that many in Europe enjoy denigrating the US and applying stupid comparisons and stereotypes to the US and it’s populace. It’s also true that if you oppose this (rightfully so) you should be just as insulted by this piece, it is no better. O’Rourke is simply over the top, Crittenden is nicer by far, but still displays an attitude that can be summed up in “If you hesitate even a minute in agreeing with us and supporting our every military venture, you are a wimp”.

    I’m all for constructive criticism of Europe and the US. It’s true of course that European nations ARE whimpish in many ways, just as it is true that the US is rash in many ways. But I think that we need to stop it with the constant bickering and realize that we are each others greatest allies and can learn from one another, if we can stop it with the damn grandstanding for just one minute!

  9. Xel
    December 5th, 2007 at 17:37
    Reply | Quote | #9

    “I’m all for constructive criticism of Europe and the US. It’s true of course that European nations ARE whimpish in many ways, just as it is true that the US is rash in many ways. But I think that we need to stop it with the constant bickering and realize that we are each others greatest allies and can learn from one another, if we can stop it with the damn grandstanding for just one minute!”

    Agreed - the trans-atlantic football match has got to stop, and promoting the above kind of “tell-it-like-it-is-am-I-controversial-yet” bloviating just won’t push in the right direction.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500