Anti-Islam Movie Cause for Great Concern

Filed under: Europe, Feature, Geert Wilders, Islam, Movies, Religion, The Netherlands — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on January 21, 2008 @ 5:47 pm CET

Admin: Due to the receipt of death threats against PoliGazette staff and their families, this post has been suspended and the comments thread closed. I am sorry to have to do this and I detest bullying, but this is just blogging and it is not worth risking innocent people’s lives. (more…)

Soldier of Orange (1917-2007)

Filed under: Movies, Netherlands, World War II — Pieter Dorsman on September 30, 2007 @ 7:40 pm CEST

Whenever I am asked about Dutch movies I answer without hesitation that the best one ever made was Soldier of Orange (1977). It was at the time the most expensive movie production ever made and it launched the international careers of both Rutger Hauer and Paul Verhoeven. With this movie Verhoeven - who went on to achieve Hollywood fame with ‘Basic Instinct’ - brought his unique brand of realism to a larger and international audience. It meant that ‘Soldier’ was enriched with quite a bit of sex and a few torture scenes that stand the test of time and are as haunting today as they were thirty years ago. But above all it was the script that was able to condense the experiences of the Dutch under Nazi rule into a compelling film built around a hero who waged his own struggle against the brutal German oppressor.

soldaatvanoranje_70880h.jpg

The movie was based on the autobiographical book written by the man who came to be known as the ‘Soldier of Orange’, Erik Hazelhoff Roelfzema who died in his home on Hawaii earlier this week at the age of 90. (more…)

Into The Wild: The Chris McCandless Story

Filed under: Jessica Schneider, Life, Literature, Movies — jesschn on September 21, 2007 @ 2:06 am CEST

I am feeling a little agitated. Ok, so I found out that on September 21, 2007 the release of Into the Wild will be coming to theatres, and then opening nationwide in the U.S. on October 5th. What is this all about, you ask? His name is Chris McCandless, and—well let me just quote myself from my own blog to give you a bit of background:

One of the few books I’ve read in the past year that have had an impact upon my writing has been Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer. It’s the story of a young guy from the East Coast who, out of college decides to drop out of established society and essentially become a ‘tramp abroad’ for two or more years. He spends most of his time hitchhiking across the country, getting odd jobs for spare cash, living on meager needs, and all the while meeting people along the way, (but telling him his name is ‘Alex’ or rather ‘Alexander Supertramp) and keeping those he meets at just the right emotional distance (I’ve done this too) where he has no expectations to fulfill. But his life ended in 1992 where he went to Alaska unprepared and with only a bag full of books, a ten-pound bag of rice, and ‘lived’ in this bus till he eventually starved to death at the age of 24. Once word got out about his death, Krakauer did a story on him in Outside Magazine, followed by this book Into the Wild. Click here to read my full post.

So now there is going to be a film, directed by Sean Penn. Here is the trailer. The reason I am a bit peeved is because no one seems to mention the fact that this kid made poor choices. The film, although I’ve not seen it yet and so I probably shouldn’t bitch about it (but will anyway) from what I gather, the film seems to be stressing this idealistic attitude of “getting out of your comfort zone and taking risks.” Sure, great idea, you think. Why the hell not? But who is our example? A young guy who lived off the land for 2 years and ended up dead.

I think McCandless’ story certainly should be told, for I enjoyed the book very much and recommend it. I also don’t think he’s a bad guy, but probably was a very nice and genuine person (albeit juvenile and selfish). But I get annoyed with these folk who call this guy a hero. Most of us do not have the privilege of just dropping out of society and not owing up to our responsibilities because we don’t feel like it anymore. Also, McCandless is a rich, white kid who comes from a privileged family. He rebels against materialism, but I should also note that this is largely a thing rich people do. It’s like that line in Scorsese’s The Aviator when Howard Hughes tells Katherine Hepburn’s mother (after she’s told Howard that they as a family ‘don’t care about money’ and Howard’s response is, ‘because you have it’).

I’m all for taking risks in life and living it to the fullest and all that crap, (one of the reasons I’m a struggling artist and not an insurance salesperson) but I suppose now at the age of 31 and seeing how most can’t pay their mortgages and nor can most afford health insurance in the U.S. and how many Katrina victims are still living in formaldehyde-laced FEMA trailers and how in Iraq the citizens can’t even walk outside their homes without risking getting shot—it’s hard for me to celebrate these reckless ideals. For the same reason I despise New Age psychobabble for its shallow remedies (although I don’t despise Chris because I do want to see the film) I think that not acknowledging this guy’s foolishness is doing a disservice. Timothy Treadwell went to Alaska and got eaten by a bear and there was a film made about it. Dick Proenneke went to Alaska, built a cabin with his own hands, built the tools even, and survived because he was smart, intelligent, and most of all prepared—and he is talked about the least. Where is the film about Dick Proenneke?

I would love to go hiking across the country and see moose and elk and all those fury creatures and trees, but I need to get published first and…I’ve lost my point. Maybe I’m just wishing I were 20 again. Do I? Hell no. My 20s sucked. I am so happy to be over 30. Thank you 30!

Anyway, see the film…read the book…or not. Just think twice about calling Chris McCandless a hero. Although I do want to go to Alaska before I die, just not in the way he did.

Thoughts, anyone?

Sicko

Filed under: Michael Moore, Movies — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on June 18, 2007 @ 5:10 pm CEST

Although Michael Moore’s new movie / documentary Sicko has not appeared in cinemas yet, you can already watch it online. Moore’s reaction to the news that people can watch it for free? He says he does not mind.

Say Anything’s Rob - being the warm and understanding person he is - decided to publish Sicko at his blog, writing:

Since Moore says he doesn’t mind his movie being shared on the internet (something I really doubt is his true feeling on the subject), and since I’m a firm believer in the idea that one of the best ways to beat a stupid idea is to give the people pushing that idea as much room as necessary to beat themselves, here’s Moore’s entire movie posted for your enjoyment. Amusement. Consternation. Whatever.

If you want to watch it, I’d say head on over to Say Anything. I haven’t had time to watch it because it’s my birthday!

23 years old. I’m an old fart.

Court orders Gere’s arrest for “obscene” kiss

Filed under: Aids, Entertainment, India, Moral Values, Morons, Movies, Richard Gere, Sex, Shilpa Shetty — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on April 26, 2007 @ 10:28 pm CEST

This is hilarious:

An Indian court ordered the arrest of Hollywood star Richard Gere Thursday for kissing Bollywood actress Shilpa Shetty at an AIDS campaign event this month saying it was an obscene act committed in public.

Gere’s repeated kisses on Shetty’s cheeks at an event to promote AIDS awareness in New Delhi sparked protests in some parts of India, mostly by Hindu vigilante groups, who saw it as an outrage against her modesty and an affront to Indian culture.

The order by a court in the northern city of Jaipur came in response to a complaint by a local lawyer.

The judge watched a video recording of Gere kissing Shetty and found him guilty of violating Indian laws against public obscenity, the lawyer, Poonam Chand Bhandari, said.

I agree. Gere should be arrested. If for nothing else, than for not appearing in any good movies (lately). Isn’t there some Indian law against that?

It’s a Wonderful Life

Filed under: Movies — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on @ 8:30 am CEST

I had to analyze Capra’s It’s a Wonderful Life for American Society II yesterday - had to write an essay, a classmate had to do a presentation. It is, of course, one of the great classics, one, in my opinion, everybody should watch. If you haven’t watched it yet, or haven’t watched it in a long time and want to watch it again, you can do so at Google Video.

Romantic? Yes. Emotional? Yes. Overdoing it a bit? Yes.

A deserved classic nonetheless?

Yes.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Michael Merritt: "If you like political humor, welcome but if you’re watching our show to catch up on...
  • Bob: When Hazleton Pennsylvania tried to crack down on immigration by holding companies and landlords responsible, a...
  • Michael Merritt: 1) Why not use it?  Hypocrisy should be pointed out where it’s due. 2) I don’t see why...
  • jkiel1: I think Romney is the best choice.  I like the way he’s articulate.  He may be a Mormon, but he...
  • Chris: If everyone followed that to the T, bloggers, opinion columnists, and every pundit in existence would be doing...

Partners