Ahmed Rashid Explains: Regional Plan Needed in Afghanistan

October 10th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Ahmed Rashid, acclaimed author and Central Asia expert, explained for theĀ Atlantic Community that he believes that NATO should step up military efforts in Afghanistan and the United States will have to start including regional powers like Iran. If not, Rashid warned, the U.S. would lose in Afghanistan and the Taliban would come back to power.

Rashid said that the U.S. needs a “regional,” not a “particular [ed. or national] strategy” in Afghanistan.

He explained that the Taliban has become a regional phenomenon, a regional problem. The Taliban are in Pakistan, India, Afghanistan and other countries. These are also some of the countries that have been active and involved in Afghanistan for years, even decades.

“If the Taliban are becoming a regional problem, we need a regional solution,” Rashid said. “Now that should involve all the countries of the region who have been intervering in Afghanistan: Iran, Pakistan, the five Republics of central Asia, India.”

In order to do something against the insurgency of the Taliban, then, the U.S. will have to involve these countries in the peace process in Afghanistan. This means that it will have to reduce tensions between India and Pakistan, for as long as the two countries remain mortal enemies, they will fight each other in Afghanistan.

Iran too, Rashid explained, will have to get involved. “Iran has been ousted of the process” by America, Rashid said. “I think that the next administration has to talk to Iran about Afghanistan and Iran has to be brought into all the various forums, economic forums, aid forums, that exist on Afghanistan, in which it is not even a member.”

Watch Rashid explain his views on video:

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
No comments yet.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500