U.S., Afghanistan, Pakistan and India

October 7th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Appearing on MSNBC’s Good Morning Joe, Christopher Hitchens explained the situation with and in Afghanistan and Pakistan quite well. Especially his remarks about Pakistan’s imperialism in Afghanistan - supporting the Taliban - are of major significance, as are his comments about India. In the end, India has fought against Al Qaeda and other groups historically supported by Pakistan for many more years than the U.S. has. Additionally, it is a major regional power, with nuclear weapons (many more than Pakistan has) and it’s a country on the rise, with relative stability (and tremendous economic growth, unlike Pakistan).

His views on Afghanistan and opium should also be taken serious, by the way. It does not make any sense whatsoever to ‘pay Turkey’ for producing opium for painkillers, while outlawing it completely in Afghanistan resulting in the Taliban receiving all avaiable opium money (which is a tremendous amount indeed).

Both Barack Obama and John McCain should indeed be asked about this subject. It is of major importance.

Also: George W. Bush does most certainly deserve credit for improving the relationship with India. The two countries, the U.S. and India, have grown towards each other tremendously in recent years, with the U.S. working with India in virtually every area, including nuclear energy.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
No comments yet.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500