Wall Street to Congress: Bailout? No, Thank You

October 6th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

In what can rightfully called the most ironic news in two or three weeks time, Wall Street executives have indicated they may choose to opt out of the bailout plan U.S. Congress approved on Friday of last week.

“There is a growing feeling that banks … might instead decide to tough it out,” said Thomas Caldwell, chairman and CEO of Caldwell Financial, a $1bn-plus fund manager.

The main reason quite some banks may decide to say ‘er, no thank you’ is that Congress loaded the original plan with so many regulations and rules that banks believe they will be too severely limited if they go ahead and play ball. “I think this hodge-podge of regulations and rules will be enough to put many [chief executives] off participating,” Caldwell said.

Additionally, sources close to Merril Lynch and Goldman Sachs said the two banks are unlikely to participate in the bailout because they believe ‘the market may be bottoming out.’

Lastly, analysts ‘believe that the mere presence of the government as buyer of last resort will be enough to get credit markets moving again.’ As such ‘a large number of banks would not need to take part for the legislation to succeed.’

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Jay_C
    October 6th, 2008 at 20:05
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Tough it out?  How can that be?  I’m confused, It’s either they need it (and worry about the details later like we have been told over and over again by the experts)  or they don’t need it right?

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500