Criticism of Bailout Plan Important, Yet Plan Necessary

October 6th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

A reader writes in response to yesterday’s “The Crisis, Wall Street and Main Street” article:

 I actually agree with some of the criticisms of the plan, and I think many financial experts would agree with the professor above. Yes, financial sector is overdeveloped, bloated, and it needs to shrink. That’s what I thought when I was working in one of those failed investment banks. (I left much earlier than the current crisis).

You don’t need to be a genius to figure out how overbloated and overpaid these people are for contributing nothing of value to society at large. But hey, you’re facing many layoffs in the industry as of now and in the following days and months to come.

It is crucial that the government pay fair value for those distressed securities and not pay more than what they are worth. It will be a challenge because a lot of those institutions holding these securities would like to get as good of a deal as possible. That’s why how the plan gets executed will be of paramount importance. Whether enough punitive measures will be enforced throughout these organizations or whether the management will really be stripped of their golden parachutes is not all that clear.

Also it’s important that institutions that are supposed to fail indeed do so without being kept afloat in defiance of market forces so to speak. But all this needs to be done while trying to keep the fabric of the financial system intact, which is why the plan was an important step in the right direction. However the critics of this plan should be loud and clear despite the fact that this plan was a necessity.

People in charge of this plan should know that Americans expect accountability - and perhaps more explaining as to why this was necessary. I also concede that the plan details and execution should be followed in a hawkish fashion so that public money doesn’t get wasted in some special interest financial deals or in bad debts or overpaid securities of institutions that were supposed to fail.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Michael
    October 6th, 2008 at 18:31
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Wow… the bailout worked as expected…

    Like pouring gasoline on a fire…

    Let me guess… we need another bailout?

  2. Jay_C
    October 6th, 2008 at 21:29
    Reply | Quote | #2
  3. John Maszka
    October 6th, 2008 at 21:49
    Reply | Quote | #3

    This bailout is just one more example of the indivisible handjob stroking irresponsible CEOs and CFOs with billions so that they can run the American economy even further into the ground. So much for Keynesian economics. If the goal is to stimulate the economy, why not give the money directly to the American taxpayer? A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush administration.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500