Why Ahmadinejad Fears Falling Oil Prices

September 27th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Meir Javedanfar explains for Pajamas Media why Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran’s President, is so afraid of falling oil prices.

Although many think that it is all about hurting the West, hurting anyone is not Ahmadinejad’s main concern in this regard, Javedanfar argues. No, the real reason Iran is constantly trying to push up oil prices is that Iran’s economy is in trouble.

Iran currently suffers from the highest inflation rate since the outbreak of the ‘Islamic Revolution’ in 1979: 27%. Furthermore, sanctions do their work tremendously as well; the only thing that is keeping the Iranian economy somewhat alive is, Javedanfar explains, oil.

But oil will not be able to make up for all the other problems if prices remain (far) below $100 a barrel. Ahmadinejad knows he has to keep those prices up. If not, Iran’s economy will suffer and the only way for him and his allies to remain in power will be to give the West what it wants; a suspension of Iran’s nuclear program.

That is, of course, something Ahmadinejad wants to prevent against all cost. He has railed against the West and defended his country’s ‘right’ to develop nuclear ‘energy’ for years. Giving in to the West, his archenemy, would be disastrous for him and, perhaps, for the leadership of the country as a whole; they would all lose face.

So they are trying to keep the prices up. They are calling on other oil producing and exporting countries to produce less oil, hoping that the prices will once again go up (artificially). But those other countries do not seem willing to give Iran what it wants… and needs. Saudi Arabia and Iran, for instance, are enemies. They are both Muslim countries, and ruled by fundamentalists, but one is Sunni the other Shiite. The one is afraid of the other and vice versa.

Ahmadinejad’s only hope is that either his enemies in the region produce less (doesn’t seem likely) or that demand for oil in the West and the rest of the world will increase significantly. Sadly for him, the second option isn’t very likely either considering the economic problems Western economies face.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Interested
    September 28th, 2008 at 03:58
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Greenspan’s got a nice write up on this (in his book) and other Oil producing countries where the Oil is their nearly sole source of income.  Essentially saying the same thing.  Went on more on the social programs that are funded by the oil revenue and the risk to the government if those programs were removed.

  2. sidney smith
    September 28th, 2008 at 14:38
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Iran can try ..my gas buddies and I have declared war on oil..now we use very little..as soon as gm delivers my volt I will stop using oil completely…I switched  to grain as the heat source for my house 5 years ago..as soon as I have enough money saved my solar array goes up …all Americans should switch to something other than oil..become a member of of pickens initiative..free our country

  3. Brook
    September 28th, 2008 at 20:02
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Actually, Sydney coal/natural gas is used to produce electricity and home heat for most Americans and that we have in abundance.    In fact, there seems to be no thought to the fact that electric cars are going to require a lot more natural gas powered electricity to charge.  Where are we going to get it if if we lock up all the prime drilling sites?

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500