Checking the Facts: Obama’s Fannie and Freddie Payday

September 23rd, 2008 By: Michael Merritt | Tags:

Last week, Sen. John McCain attempted to point out his opponent Sen. Barack Obama’s hypocrisy during the financial crisis by stating that Obama was the senator who got the second most amount of money from the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, behind Banking Committee chairman Chris Dodd.  Politifact checked into the situation, and labels McCain’s statement as “mostly true,” but not in the way you may think.

Many corporations gather up individual contributions from their employees and send them off to the campaigns in one big bundle.  You’ll find many of the same names on both the contribution lists of John McCain and Barack Obama.

And that’s basically the jist of the Politifact article.  Obama raised a lot of money from Fannie and Freddie, but via their employees.  The numbers:

On the Freddie and Fannie question, it as McCain said: Obama is No. 2 on the list, with $126,349, right after Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, who had $165,400.

But the list requires a few notes of explanation.

Corporations cannot give to candidates, so the center’s list adds up contributions from Fannie and Freddie employees and their families. Obama has received a lot of money during his presidential campaign, though, and Fannie and Freddie don’t make his list of top 20 companies. (The top three companies with employees donating to Obama are Goldman Sachs, University of California, and Citigroup, according to the center.)

Maybe McCain meant to say the Obama was in it with the fat cats of Fannie and Freddie, the directors and lobbyists? Hope not:

The New York Times looked at contributions from Fannie and Freddie’s boards of directors and lobbyists, who are technically not employees.  That analysis found Fannie and Freddie-related contributors gave $116,000 to John McCain and his related committees, compared with $16,000 to Obama and his related committees.

Meanwhile, Obama had a former CEO of Fannie Mae, Jim Johnson, on his VP selection commitee until June 11, and McCain currently has a former Fannie and Freddie lobbyist on his transition committee.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. C Stanley
    September 23rd, 2008 at 14:01
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Disagree with Arcane about the comment moderation, but I do agree that the ads make reading very difficult. It may be an IE thing, but after the ads pop up and you navigate back to the page, it won’t load properly (the screen shakes and then won’t scroll down.)

  2. Tara
    September 24th, 2008 at 00:39
    Reply | Quote | #3

    This is not entirely true.  The Times is potentially the most liberal newspaper of our age.  Read carefully the quote from their article: "$116,000 to John McCain and his related committees".  If you notice they add "Related committees" which could be ANYTHING they want to make it, and I guarantee 116k is an arbitrary #.  As the article above actually rightfully says OBAMA HIMSELF recieved more from Freddie and Fannie than anyone else & he’s only been a senator for 3 years!  "The only person who has taken more is Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., chairman of the Senate Banking Committee" and he has been around for a LONG time.

  3. Michael Merritt
    September 24th, 2008 at 02:01
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Tara, did you even read my entry, or just key in on the dollar amount that Sen. Obama received from the employees of the two banks?

    There is a definite chance that McCain may have only gotten a small portion of the donations from the directors and lobbyists and Obama more.  Who knows?  I was only providing information there.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500