UNDP Goes Silent on DPRK Aid

September 21st, 2008 By: Bal(t)imoron | Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Cross-Posted at Left Flank (includes a bhTV diavlog featuring Mark Leon Goldberg and Matthew Lee)

Matthew Lee reporting from “deep in the weeds” at the United Nations is an inspiration for people who make a mission out of their jobs - in this case journalism. So, I’ll pass on his plaint/query, should the UN Development Programme have to publish its audits of its own budget, either to member states or us? UNDP wants to return to DPRK dispensing food aid to North Koreans, and damn what’s happening with the human rights situation or WMD. Is there a connection to the recent “health setback” Kim Jong-il suffered and Pyongyang’s return to a hardline WMD stance?

A South Korean official familiar with the talks said what lies ahead may be drawn-out negotiations but it did not mean Pyongyang was about to quit the disarmament process for good.

McCormack said the United States would also “remain engaged” with the North Koreans and would not give up on the six-nation process that led to the disarmament-for-aid deal.

The South Korean official said the North knows aid and disablement are linked. Energy-starved North Korea has been receiving partial shipments of 1 million tons of heavy fuel oil for previous progress it has made under the deal.

Perhaps UNDP, all regional players, including the US, and Pyongyang have admitted to themselves what the rest of us have cynically believed all along: it’s back to square one.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
No comments yet.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500