Pakistan Parties Prepare for Elections

September 5th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Tomorrow, Saturday, the Pakistani people will have the opportunity to vote for the person they consider best able to lead their country.The three most important candidates and parties started a final push on Friday to convince voters to vote for them. It are important elections for Pakistan is riven by economic problems and Islamic extremists. In the last year alone bombings and suicide attacks killed more than 1,200 people.The elections come after the long and stable rule of Pervez Musharraf, who was forced to resign recently because parliament had united to oust him from office. Asif Ali Zardari, Benazir Bhutto’s widower, is most likely to win the race for president, but the other two leading candidate have not given up just yet.   Pakistan’s elections have already proven to be both chaotic and violent. Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani was the target of an assassination attempt yesterday. His car was hit by sniper fire. Luckily he was not in the car at the moment his enemies struck.  Zardari has said he supports the United States in the war on terrorism. The main reason for this support is not moral; it is financial or economical. Pakistan is heavily dependent on U.S. aide. George W. Bush’s administration has sent many dollars to Pakistan after 9/11, in return for support in the war on terrorism. If this aide would disappear, Pakistan would have a major problem. It is unlikely that Zardari will fight extremists more aggressively than Musharraf did. One major reason for Musharraf’s unpopularity in the last months and years of his presidency was his support for the U.S. If Zardari wants to stay in power for a considerable amount of time - and he does of course - he can probably not afford to support the U.S. too strongly. Unlike Musharraf had, Zardari does not have the support from the military to back him up in case of trouble. As a result, he is unlikely to do much against Islamic radicals. He will, probably, appease them much more than Musharraf did. The above forces one to wonder whether it was wise for the United States to stop supporting the former president, Musharraf. The sad reality is, though, that at the moment the Pakistani people turned away from their president and especially when the Pakistani army stopped supporting him, there was not much more the U.S. could do. Keeping an unpopular president in power of a developing country has been tried in the past, and the results have nearly always been catastrophic.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
No comments yet.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500