John McCain: Man of the Middle

September 5th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Duly impressed by John McCain’s acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention, Jules Crittenden writes that this year’s elections is the Republicans’ to lose. According to Jules McCain “reclaimed the vast middle ground of American politics” in his speech; most Americans, Jules argues, are exactly there, in the middle.

In this middle ”people may hold a variety of views, but value directness and character above all.”

According to Jules, McCain “severely undercut the Democratic line that he is pandering to the right” in his acceptance speech.

“America has been presented with a team that represents genuine accomplishment, character and independence. And America, I suspect, is smart enough to get that and appreciate that,” he goes on to write.

McCain’s current strategy is exactly what he needed. He had to pander to the right shortly, in order to rally the Republican base. Now, however, he needs moderates and independents - and even moderate Democrats - to support his candidacy. These are the people who supported him throughout the years, who always hoped who would win the Republican nomination some day so that America would be governed from the middle (to a degree). McCain is not a centrist, but he is independent-minded and quite moderate. He is a maverick, more than willing to take on the establishment. He is pro-life and thus very conservative on abortion, but he is pro-government action on global warming, and thus more progressive. He is someone who has a record of positive change, and who could use that record to make clear that if Americans want lasting, positive and effective change, they’d better go with him.

This is what McCain had to do, and it is what he’s doing now. This election will not be as much between change and experience, but between liberal big-government change on the one hand, and moderately conservative and pragmatical change on the other. That is, at the very least, what McCain has to tell American voters time and again.

Obama’s campaign has tried to portray McCain as a die hard partisan, where McCain has been anything but throughout his long career. He ignored his maverick credentials for a while in order to charm the conservative partisan base, now he needs to be who he truly is.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Interested
    September 5th, 2008 at 14:13
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I’m thinking with Palin - it may, if they avoid mistakes - put them over the top.  All hypocrisy of the left about a female VP aside - the potential is most certainly there.

  2. Jonathan Wilson
    September 5th, 2008 at 17:32
    Reply | Quote | #2

    This is the most powerful Republican ticket I’ve ever seen. And for the Democrats it’s the worst Democratic Ticket since Kerry + Edwards.

    McCain’s speech last night was very powerful and emotional, and I think people will notice that he talked about the issues unlike Barack Obama who simply talked about the attacks against HIM, because that’s all it is for Obama, it’s all about HIM.

    I cannot believe the Democrats cannot find anyone more accomplished than the lobbyist appeasing Joe Biden and an inexperienced  ambitious nobody named Barack Obama.

  3. Dennis Thorn
    September 5th, 2008 at 18:31
    Reply | Quote | #3

    It is gratifying to see that conservatism is still alive and well. The Democratic candidate is, at the very least, doing God’s work. He scares the hell out of me!

    One has to wonder who’s actually behind him: socialists or Islamists. Some extreme group has groomed him (almost from early childhood) to become the President of the United States. We have been told over and over again that our demise will come from inside as opposed to outside.

    McCain emphasizes our need to get back to the basics. This is a must. We cannot support our entire population. We need to take responsibility for our own lives. If we do as Obama suggests, take from the rich and give to the poor we will be embracing socialism. Also, who are the rich? The entrepeneurs, who risk it all, go into business and hire workers? The business owners who pay the highest taxes in the nation? Are the "rich" just going to sit back and let the slugs of our society rob them of their "riches?" No, they will pass their losses on down to the middle class consumer. The bottom line is this: if you don’t want to be poor, get off your butt and make something of yourself. In this great nation legal (and even illegal) opportunities abound. It appears to me that we all have three choices: take advantage of these opportunities and prosper, stay in the same impoverished rut and shut up or go hang yourself and let the rest of us get on with our lives.

  4. Michael Merritt
    September 6th, 2008 at 06:12
    Reply | Quote | #4

    One has to wonder who’s actually behind him: socialists or Islamists. Some extreme group has groomed him (almost from early childhood) to become the President of the United States. We have been told over and over again that our demise will come from inside as opposed to outside.

    If either candidate uses these same tactics to define their opponent, they deserve to lose.

  5. Booker Rising
    September 22nd, 2008 at 04:22
    #5

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500