Detroit Mayor; Before Going to Jail Hints at Comeback

September 5th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Only hours after he agreed to resign as mayor of Detroit, Kwame Kilpatrick expressed regret for the scandal that forced him to resign and serve time in jail as part of a plea deal, while leaving room open for a possible comeback in the future.

He walked ‘into a City Hall conference room Thursday to thunderous applause and thanked his family, backers and staff members for sticking by him during his rocky 6 1/2-year tenure.’

“I truly know who I am. I truly know where I come from. In Detroit I know who I am. And I know because of that, there’s another day for me,” he said in a 20-minute speech on live television. “I want to tell you, Detroit, that you done set me up for a comeback.”

Although he may hint as a comeback all he wants, the reality is that his plea deal means he cannot run for elected office for a period of five years. Additionally, he has lost his license to practice law and he has to serve four months in jail. Lastly, he has to pay the city $1 million in restitution.

Kilpatrick pleaded guilty to two counts of obstruction of justice. ‘

The scandal stems from a whistleblower lawsuit filed by two former police officers who accused Kilpatrick of retaliating against them for trying to investigate misconduct by the mayor and his security detail. Questioned under oath in 2004 and 2007, Kilpatrick repeatedly denied having an affair with his chief of staff, Christine Beatty.’

Later, however, the Detroit Free Press published text messages between the two, which made crystal clear that their relationship was not purely professional. Kilpatrick and Beatty were, as a result, charged.

‘In addition to perjury, Kilpatrick was accused of misleading City Council when he secured its approval of an $8.4 million settlement with three former police officers. Prosecutors said he settled to keep the text messages from becoming public.’

What is most fascinating about the scandal is that it all boils down to one thing; he had sex with a woman not his own. He cheated on his wife. That is what the case really is all about.

And that is quite sad. He was a thug, sure, but in the end, this was a highly private issue. It is not the public’s right to know with whom their elected officials are sleeping, and whether or not they are faithful to their spouse. That is private, and should remain private.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. BBQ
    September 5th, 2008 at 15:16
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I still say that situations like this are different. Having an affair with people under you is an issue. It can lead to sexual harassment or possibly blackmail. It shows an extremely lack of professionalism.

    If he just picked up some woman at a bar, I wouldn’t care at all.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500