The One Who Has Been Executive Most

September 4th, 2008 By: Michael Merritt | Tags:

Am I the only one who thinks John McCain has to be cringing every time a Republican speaks about how much executive experience Sarah Palin has?  You know, considering that he, like Barack Obama and Joe Biden have none of which to speak?

Following the talking points, Rudy Giuliani made this argument tonight.  You know, I thought that experience was going to be destroyed as a campaign issue once I heard Palin was the choice.  Apparently not, since the Republicans have re-cast it in terms of executive experience.

Unless there’s some fuzzy math I’ve missing where Congressmen and Senators can trade in their legislative experience for some Executive Experience Credits, the Republicans might want to watch what they’re saying before the Democrats try and turn it around on them.

After all, John McCain is the one they want as President, right?  Or did I hear wrong and Palin really won the nomination tonight?  With all the touting of executive experience they’re making, you might think so.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Chris
    September 4th, 2008 at 07:07
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Its a fair point.  And right now it seems as if the campaign is between Palin and Obama.  That won’t last.  When McCain and Obama compare records AS THE RESPECTIVE NOMINEES OF THIER PARTIES then it will be self-evident who has the weightier record.

    A month ago it was clear that the McCain campaign felt the election was all about Obama.  They had to change that.  First it was the attacks on Obama and the "celebrity" thing.  That seemed to work but we all knew at some point the McCain campaign would have to focus on McCain.  Well now the focus is on Palin.  So in a sense the campaign stategists have done too well.  We’ll see.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500