Jack Abramoff: 4 Years in Prison

September 4th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

Lobbyist Jack Abramoff was sentenced to four years in prison, on Thursday. The judge in the case said Abramoff’s corruption had ’shattered the public’s confidence in government.’

Abramoff fought back tears when he tried to appeal to the judge to give him a lesser sentence than the prosecutors seeked. Instead, though, the judge handed down a higher sentence.

“I come before you as a broken man,” Abramoff said at his sentencing before U.S. District Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle. “I’m not the same man who happily and arrogantly engaged in a lifestyle of political and business corruption.”

He added later that, “My name is the butt of a joke, the source of a laugh and the title of a scandal.”

For some reason the judge did not feel particularly sorry for the corrupt lobbyist.

Abramoff’s defense lawyers and the prosecutors in the case appealed to the judge to let Abramoff off the hook, to a degree at least. The judge could sentence him to 11 years in prison but, both sides argued, he coorperated so well with the FBI that he deserved a less harsh sentence.

Well, less he got, but still quite serious; four years. He was also found guilty in a separated case in Florida; in that case, he was sentenced to two years in prison. All in all, the formerly powerful lobbyist has to serve six years in jail.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Interested
    September 5th, 2008 at 02:39
    Reply | Quote | #1

    The judge in the case said Abramoff’s corruption had ’shattered the public’s confidence in government.’

    While it’s great the public held the Republicans to task for their misdeeds - it’s a damn shame the Democrats got a free pass on their corruption.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500