An Imminent Attack Against Iran?

September 3rd, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

James S. Robbins looks at reports for National Review Online that appeared in the Dutch newspaper the Telegraaf about the infiltration of Iran’s nuclear program by agents of the Dutch secret service and a possible planned U.S. attack against Iran in order to prevent the Mullahs from developing nuclear weapons.

Robbins conclusion: “I have no idea whether any of these reports of imminent action are true. But as the various clocks keep ticking, the strategic logic of active counter-proliferation against Iran becomes more compelling. The U.S. may act, Israel may act, or not. We will know soon enough, one way or the other.”

Although the U.S. favors diplomacy at this point in time, it is difficult if not impossible to imagine that Bush et al. will allow the Iranians to develop nuclear weapons. It is crystal clear that the country’s nuclear program is not aimed at developing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, which should and does concern the entire West (Israel included).

Since the U.S. have been most vocal on this issue and have the strongest military, it seems likely that it will act militarily against Iran before it has a nuclear weapon. Then again, if it does not Israel certain will, for the threat posed by a nuclear Iran is not merely indirect for them, but direct.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. David
    September 3rd, 2008 at 00:56
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Attack on Iran = electoral suicide.

    Not until after November, unless the Iranians do something very drastic.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500