Report Confirms: Gonzales is Truly Stupid

September 2nd, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

In what can be called the shocker of the day, a report issued Tuesday by the Justice Department’s inspector general says that former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales mishandled counterterror secrets.

Mishandling secret informatoion violates Justice Department regulations, and ‘removing them from special secure facilities without proper authorization is a misdemeanor crime.

Despite the above, the Department decided not to press charges against Gonzales.

The report, written by Inspector General Glenn A. Fine, ‘found that Gonzales risked exposing at least some parts of the National Security Agency’s terrorist surveillance program, as well as interrogations of terrorist detainees. Some aspects of the surveillance program explicitly referred to in the documents were “zealously protected” by the NSA, the report found.’

Investigators considered prosecuting Gonzales for his bad management, but decided not to do it after ‘an internal debate.’ The exact reason for the decision not to punish Gonzales for his stupidity remains, as of yet, unknown.

The main problem with Gonzales’ handling of classified material is that he did not protect them well enough; others had the opportunity to read them, just because he was too lazy or to incompetent to take good care of sensitive materials. Instead of locking them in a safe, for instance, he simply put them in a briefcase. To make matters even worse, he admits he did not always lock it, making it even easier for third parties to read information they are not allowed to see.

Gonzales may lose all the security clearances he still has due to his incompetence. One wonders, however, whether the ones who hired him should not be punished as well; after all, it should have been glaringly obvious that Gonzales was not competent enough to be the messenger of the Attorney General, let alone the AG himself.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. kritt11
    September 3rd, 2008 at 16:20
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Someone explain to me how what Gonzo did is any different than what Sandy Berger was prosecuted for.

  2. Jason, Managing Editor
    September 3rd, 2008 at 16:41
    Reply | Quote | #2

    You call a paltry $50,000 fine for stealing classified documents from the National Archives as part of a political cover-up a "prosecution"?

    Gonzales’ actions seem comparable under the letter of the law, but somehow I suspect that you, Kim, and others of your ideological bent will be more…um….energetic in insisting on accountability in his case.  LOL

    It is interesting to see you bring up Sandy Berger, since I have never once seen you bring up any Democrats who misbehave except as quickly-forgotten rhetorical foils to claim Republicans are worse. Oh. Wait. That’s exactly what you are doing here. Never mind.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500