Misreading the Culture Wars

September 2nd, 2008 By: Jason, Managing Editor | Tags:

UPDATE BELOW 

Many anti-conservatives think they have found a winner with their continuing casting of 17-year-old Bristol Palin as the dispositive indicator of “hypocrisy” on the part of social conservatives. To them, if any social conservative OR any member of his or her family or group of friends is anything less than morally perfect, then that is proof of “hypocrisy” to be trumpeted from the rooftops with an assured smugness that only those who actually DO believe themselves to be morally perfect can muster.

The problem, as Kleinheider posts at the Nashville Post, is that in their rush to preen themselves and hate conservatives (yet again), they read social conservatives exactly wrong:

The Left simply misunderstands the Cultural War because they believe that social and religious conservatives think they are perfect people. Rural, working class people know exactly who they are. The Left seems to think that they are somehow breaking the news to social conservatives that sometimes, even often, kids will have sex and get pregnant. Social conservatives know these things. They are not as divorced from reality as they sometimes get painted.

You see, conservatives have code by which they live that accounts for it all. Whether they are “right” or “wrong” is immaterial. It is the Left’s misunderstanding which is important here.

Conservatives know they are imperfect. Instead of embracing the imperfection and “giving up” they instead prefer to strive for something better.

Now, whether this outlook is conservative outlook is true or untrue, healthy or unhealthy is, again, not the point, politically speaking. Telling the American working class that Sarah Palin was wrong to have tried to bring up her daughters by a code in which she believed and that Bristol Palin’s unborn child is the proof that the Left’s arguments about traditional life are true will not resonate with anyone who is not already an Obama voter.

The Left cannot win this Battle of Bristol. The more they try to win it, to demonstrate they are right, the more they will lose ground with those voters they desperate need to stay home or vote for Barack Obama.

For what the Left sees as hypocrisy, most folks who are not Obama voters just see as falling short. As, of course, we, as humans, all do.

The problem here is that too many on the left see conservatives as caricatures rather than people. And because their understanding of conservatives has never advanced beyond the level of character development found in a cheap comic book, they always seem to wind up lashing out at conservatives in ways that offend rather than persuade.

Once again, the leftist side of the blogosphere winds up indulging in the endlessly growing extremism of its own group-think syndrome, killing off its own best arguments in a self-destructive emotional vendetta to score points against people they hate instead of actually make the valid arguments available to them on substance.

Sad. And stupid. But alas, it seems, predictable. Indeed, we see this type of thing from them time and time and time again.

UPDATE: Protein Wisdom finds another gem, a Democratic Party activist blatantly arguing that a teenager’s misdeeds are presumed the result of bad mothering.  Does anyone really want to defend the anti-Palin argument across-the-board here?  Or is this just another in the long, long list of areas where there are no rules of consistency, logic, or decency that are allowed to get in the way of bashing those horrible, evil conservatives?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. David
    September 2nd, 2008 at 21:29
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I am not an American nor have I ever actually visited the US, but I have been following the US elections.  The left wing hatefest over Palin’s daughter is the most repulsive thing that I have witnessed in any election campaign, ever.

  2. Jason, Managing Editor
    September 2nd, 2008 at 21:35
    Reply | Quote | #2

    It is blatantly hypocritical too.  These are, in many cases, the exact same people who have gone absolutely bonkers condemning conservatives for their insensitivity to the problems of parents and particularly those of teenaged mothers.

    Of course, to the political left in the U.S. right now, "hypocrisy" and "accountability" are words reserved exclusively for other people.

  3. Chris
    September 2nd, 2008 at 21:46
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Following up on the comments:
    1) Yes, a lot of misunderstanding (to put it mildly) or assumptions of stupidity/backwardness (to put it harshly) from some on the left regarding this situation.  In other words, if your daugther gets pregnant, you’re stupid because, of course, she’s having sex and, of course, you can’t affect that decision and, of course, she should have been on birth control
    2) You can hide an abortion; you can’t hide a pregnancy.
    3) Yes, we’re pro-choice but there’s really only one choice that’s correct.

    Now, one could discuss how much attention Gov Palin can pay to her future position if she’s busy with a infant with Down’s and a new grand-daughter.  but the discussions I’ve seen (and "discussion" is way too nice of a description of what I’ve seen) have only to do with utter disdain and contempt.  And as a parent who just recently saw his last child into their twenties (including one daughter) reading some of these comments has been VERY PAINFUL.  I only prayer that the Palin’s don’t see them

  4. Elif
    September 3rd, 2008 at 09:47
    Reply | Quote | #4

    TreeHuggingMoonbat, by your qoute, although indirectly you are supporting attacks to Palin because of her family and therefore I think before making any comments about the objectivity of this blog, you should reconsider your ethical values.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500