Rice Discusses Troop Withdrawal with Iraqis

August 21st, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice flew to Baghdad earlier today. She went to Iraq to talk with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and other top officials about a U.S.-Iraq security deal that, among other things, deals with the withdrawal of U.S. troops.

“The negotiators have taken this very, very far,” she told reporters, “but there is no reason to believe that there is an agreement yet. “There are still issues concerning exactly how our forces operate,” Rice said. “The agreement rests on aspirational timelines.”

Main points of disagreement are, at this point, a timetable for the withdrawal, immunity for U.S. soldiers ‘and the handling of Iraqi prisoners.’

According to insiders the two sides completed a draft agreement that would extend ‘the legal basis for U.S. troops to remain in Iraq beyond the end of this year, while calling for them to move out of Iraqi cities as soon as June 30.’

Not only does the Iraq government want the U.S. troops to leave Iraqi cities in the summer of next year, it also wants the U.S. to agree to withdraw all troops by 2011.

The main point at stake here is the independence of Iraq; if the Iraqis truly want the U.S. to withdraw before 2012, the U.S. has to accept it. In the end, it is their country. Having said that the U.S. is right to pursue its own interests and to try to ensure that a withdrawal will not be premature. If it withdraws prematurely chaos may very well break out again, which will probably result in huge pressure on America to once again come in and safe the day.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
No comments yet.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500