NATO Will Take on Russia: Rice

August 19th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said, while visiting Europe, that NATO will not allow Russia to succeed in Georgia.

The reaction of the United States was lukewarm at first, but has heated up ever since. Two days after the Russian invasion of Georgia began the U.S. upped the ante by threatening with sanctions and other, unspecified, punishments. Rice’s visit to Europe is part of the American attempt to isolate Russia and to form an international coalition against Russian imperialism.

The main question is, of course, what it is NATO can do. If it truly wanted to protect Georgia it should have threatened to send forces to the region. What it can now do, it seems, is the following (better late than never should be the approach): NATO should take the offers presented by former Soviet Republics such as the Ukraine and Poland. The missile defense system should be put in every single country willing to host it. Furthermore, NATO should start a big program to help former Soviet Republics to the south of Russia, such as Azerbaijan and Georgia, in every possible way.

Helping them militarily and economically. Helping them develop their own resources should be a major part of NATO’s policy. NATO should once again realize that it was created to tame the Russian bear, not for any other purpose.

Encouraging other former Soviet Republics to join NATO should also be part of the attempt to isolate and contain Russia. European NATO countries opposed a possible Georgian membership. They will now have to reconsider. Georgia and other countries that want to become members should be allowed, nay encouraged, to do so. This will undoubtedly anger the Russians, but that should be of no concern right now. Russia was angered during the Cold War, but the containment and rollback strategy worked.

What is most fascinating and hopegiving is that Europe and the U.S. appear, for once, to be reasonably united. The EU’s leaders responded coldly at first, but they too seem to realize now that Russia poses a threat to former Soviet Republics trying to democratize and to themselves and their own interests. U.S. diplomatic leadership is, in this regard, paying off.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. David
    August 20th, 2008 at 10:02
    Reply | Quote | #1

    At the moment an emerging issue in Georgia is the fact that the Russians are not sticking to the EU brokered “peace deal”. This was a deal largely dictated by Russia in any event.

    Under the deal Russian troops were meant to withdraw to positions held before the conflict. They are not doing this, claiming to be entitled to stay in a 14 km “buffer zone” inside Georgia.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500