Opium in Afghanistan: Big Business

August 5th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

For years now, Western analysts, journalists and bloggers have said that the West should come up with an effective plan to destroy the production of opium in Afghanistan. Opium was and continues to be big business in this Middle Eastern country, even though the country has been conquered by a coalition of Western forces who have to deal with the effects of opium daily at home.

Opium causes a lot of problems, both in Afghanistan and in other countries, especially the West. Yet, the West has not been able to develop a plan that convinces Afghanis to stop producing this narcotic. The hard approach has been tried, and has failed; soldiers burned down opium plants, hoping that Afghanis would then start producing other products.

That has not happened, however. Opium production flowers like never before. The main reason for this is simple; it pays off. Every now and then Western troops burn down opium farms, but producing and selling opium is still a lucrative business.

Relatively that is.

I say relatively because opium farmers are not by rich by any means. They are not rich by Afghani standards, let alone by Western standards. Producing opium does not help Afghani farmers to become rich; it only helps them survive.  All too often these farmers cannot take care of their family without opium. Opium enables them to feed their children and to send them to school. Life without selling opium would be disastrous for these farmers.

This means that if the West truly wants to prevent opium from being produced in Afghanistan on such a massive scale, it has to give Afghanis something in return. And let there be no doubt about it; opium destroys life in the West. We cannot possibly allow Afghanis to continue to sell this devastating narcotic to Western victims. At this moment, 93% of the world’s heroin is produced in Afghanistan.

The New York Times spends some attention to this growing problem in its latest editorial but this American newspaper too forgets to come up with a plan to discourage farmers from growing ‘poppy.’ It mainly suggests punishing drug traffickers and dealers, but does not offer a reasonable alternative for Afghani farmers. These farmers will continue to produce opium, no matter how severe the legal punishments as long as this means that they are able to provide for their family.

In the end, we have to change something dramatically; and that’s the approach to this problem. Zero tolerance is not goin to work, nor has it ever worked in the past when dealing with desperate individuals.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
No comments yet.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500