Money & Votes & the Armenian Issue

August 5th, 2008 By: Kemal | Tags:

Michael recently wrote a post criticizing the contents of a letter concerning events that transpired between Ottoman Muslims and Armenians during WWI written by Matthew Reynolds, Acting Assistant Secretary of State for legislative affairs to Democratic Sen. Joseph Biden, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.  As Michael so aptly pointed out-

 What’s missing in this letter and in all other letters relating to this event some call the ‘Armenian genocide,’ are Turkish Moslem victims. For some reason, Western politicians do not seem to care much about the tremendous loss of life among Turkish Moslems; about how they were butchered, raped, vilified, tortured, drowned, suffocated, beaten or burned to death. This letter is no exception in this regard.

The post suggests that politicians readily overlook the suffering of Ottoman Muslims, and let’s not forget that there were also Ottoman Jews who suffered as much, for money and votes.  One commenter, seems to insinuate that Michael’s hypothesis is inaccurate.  So why don’t we take a closer look?

The U.S. Federal Election Commission is an independent regulatory agency established in 1975 to administer and enforce the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). That statute limits the sources and amounts of the contributions used to finance federal elections, requires public disclosure of campaign finance information and–in tandem with the Primary Matching Payment Act and the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act–provides for the public funding of Presidential elections.

All campaign contributions in excess of $249 made to a candidate running for federal office must be reported and, what’s more, information about such contributions are readily available at the Federal Election Commission’s website.  In fact, the website has a wonderful search engine that allows one to see who contributed how much to who, in what city and state the contributor is resident, and their profession.  In addition, in the U.S., citizens may form political action committees that raise money as a group and then donate funds to various campaigns.

Some time ago, a friend did a little detailed research to determine how much money runs from the Armenian diaspora to federally elected officials.  The results were quite surprising.  For the 2006 election cycle, a little research uncovered that Armenian political action committees contributed $202,500 to candidates for U.S. Senate and Congress–that number is for Armenian political action committees only and does not include campaign contributions made by members of the Armenian diaspora individually.  Please note, that is the election cycle immediately preceding the big brouhaha raised by the non-binding House Resolution 106, pushed by Armenian lobbies to recognize their genocide claims.

Then, there’s Robert Menendez, a great friend of the Armenian lobby.  He alone has received well over $136,000 from individual Armenian contributors and Armenian political action committees.

Note, these numbers are derived from the U.S. Federal Election Commission’s website only.  That means that these numbers do not reflect contributions of $249 or less, which means the amount of campaign contributions received by candidates from the Armenian diaspora was greater that what is reflected at the Commission’s site.

As one reviews the information at the Federal Election Commission, what’s striking is that individual Armenians very often contribute to candidates who are not running for office from their district and that many individuals simultaneously contribute to both Republicans and Democrats of varying political ideologies-the latter also being the case for Armenian political action committees.  So, it seems, these contributions are not necessarily driven by a political ideology such as the desire to support political conservatives or liberals.

As for Michael’s statement about money and votes, definitely money–the money trail is there for everyone to see.  As for votes, well, we all know where Menendez stands and he is the beneficiary of quite a bit of money from the Armenian diaspora.

Further information/confirmation can be had by reviewing the Federal Election Commission’s website, but below is some, and definitely not all, of the information on Armenian political action committees that I was forwarded:

2006 Election Cycle

ARMENIAN AMERICAN PAC (ARMENPAC)

ALLEN, GEORGE
SENATE Republican VA   2,500

ALLEN, THOMAS H
HOUSE Democrat ME        500

ANDREWS, ROBERT E
HOUSE Democrat NJ       3,000

BACA, JOE
HOUSE Democrat CA        500

BASS, CHARLES F.
HOUSE Republican NH     500

BERMAN, HOWARD L
HOUSE Democrat CA      1,000

BRADLEY, JOSEPH E MR III
HOUSE Republican NH      500

BROWN, SHERROD
SENATE Democrat OH    1,500

CANTOR, ERIC
HOUSE Republican VA   3,500

CANTWELL, MARIA
SENATE Democrat WA  1,500

CARDIN, BENJAMIN L
SENATE Democrat MD   2,500

CHAFEE, LINCOLN D
SENATE Republican RI   1,000

CLINTON, HILLARY RODHAM
SENATE Democrat NY    1,000

CROWLEY, JOSEPH
HOUSE Democrat NY  1,000

DELAHUNT, WILLIAM D
HOUSE Democrat MA    500

DELAURO, ROSA
HOUSE Democrat CT    1,000

DOGGETT, LLOYD A MR.
HOUSE Democrat TX      500

DURBIN, RICHARD J
SENATE Democrat IL    1,500

EDWARDS, CHET
HOUSE Democrat TX    1,000

FERGUSON, MIKE
HOUSE Republican NJ    500

FILNER, BOB
HOUSE Democrat DC   500

FITZPATRICK, MICHAEL G
HOUSE Republican PA  500

GERLACH, JIM
HOUSE Republican PA   1,000

GUTKNECHT, GILBERT W JR.
HOUSE Republican MN   500

HERSETH, STEPHANIE M
HOUSE Democrat SD    1,000

HOLT , RUSH D
HOUSE Democrat NJ   500

HOOLEY, DARLENE
HOUSE Democrat OR   500

HOYER, STENY HAMILTON
HOUSE Democrat MD   500

JOHNSON, NANCY L.
HOUSE Republican CT  500

KALOOGIAN, HOWARD
HOUSE Republican CA   3,952

KELLY, SUE W
HOUSE Republican NY  500

KENNEDY, PATRICK J
HOUSE Democrat RI     1,500

KIRK, MARK STEVEN
HOUSE Republican IL   500

KNOLLENBERG, JOSEPH K
HOUSE Republican MI  4,073

LOBIONDO, FRANK A,
HOUSE Republican NJ  1,000

MALONEY, CAROLYN B
HOUSE Democrat NY  1,000

MARCHANT, KENNY EWELL
HOUSE Republican TX     500

MCCONNELL, MITCH
SENATE Republican KY   2,500

MCCOTTER, THADDEUS G
HOUSE Republican MI      1,500

MCDERMOTT, JAMES A
HOUSE Democrat WA       500

MENENDEZ, ROBERT
SENATE Democrat NJ    3,500

MOORE, DENNIS
HOUSE Democrat KS   500

OBEY, DAVID R
HOUSE Democrat WI    1,000

PALLONE, FRANK JR
SENATE Democrat NJ  1,000

PAYNE, DONALD M
HOUSE Democrat NJ    500

PORTER, JON C SR
HOUSE Republican NV  500

REID, HARRY
SENATE Democrat NV   1,500

ROTHMAN, STEVEN R
HOUSE Democrat NJ      1,000

SANTORUM, RICHARD J
SENATE Republican PA    2,000

SARBANES, JOHN PETER SPYROS
HOUSE Democrat MD      1,500

SCHWARTZ, ALLYSON
HOUSE Democrat PA      500

SCHWARZ, JOHN
HOUSE Republican MI    1,000

SHAW, E CLAY JR
HOUSE Republican FL    1,000

SHAYS, CHRISTOPHER
HOUSE Republican CT     500

SHERMAN, BRAD MR
HOUSE Democrat CA    1,000

SIMMONS, ROB
HOUSE Republican CT   1,000

SIRES, ALBIO
HOUSE  Democrat NJ   500

SNOWE, OLYMPIA J
SENATE Republican ME  1,000

STABENOW, DEBBIE
SENATE Democrat MI   1,000

STARK, PETE
HOUSE Democrat CA     500

SWEENEY, JOHN E.
HOUSE Republican NY   1,000

TAUSCHER, ELLEN O
HOUSE Democrat CA     1,000

UDALL, MARK
HOUSE Democrat CO  500

VAN HOLLEN, CHRIS
HOUSE Democrat MD    1,000

WELDON, CURTIS W.
HOUSE Republican PA    500

WELLER, GERALD C JERRY
HOUSE Republican DC   500

WOLF, JOSHUA L
HOUSE Democrat OH    500

ARMENIAN AMERICAN PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE

CONYERS, JOHN JR.
HOUSE Democrat MI     100

DINGELL, JOHN D MR.
HOUSE Democrat DC    100

EHLERS, VERNON J
HOUSE Republican MI   100

KILDEE, DALE
HOUSE Democrat MI      100

KILPATRICK, CAROLYN CHEEKS
HOUSE Democrat MI  100

KNOLLENBERG, JOSEPH K
HOUSE Republican MI   150

LEVIN, SANDER M
HOUSE Democrat MI  100

MCCOTTER, THADDEUS G
HOUSE Republican MI   100

MILLER, CANDICE S.
HOUSE Republican MI   100

PALLONE, FRANK JR
SENATE Democrat NJ    150

ROGERS, MICHAEL J
HOUSE Republican MI   100

SCHWARZ, JOHN
HOUSE Republican  MI  100

ARMENIAN AMERICANS LEGISLATIVE ISSUES COMMITTEE

KLOBUCHAR, AMY J
SENATE Democrat MN  1,000

MENENDEZ, ROBERT
SENATE Democrat  NJ   4,123

ARMENIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE PAC

BERMAN, HOWARD L
HOUSE Democrat CA    1,250

KALOOGIAN, HOWARD
HOUSE Republican CA   4,300

PALLONE, FRANK JR
SENATE Democrat NJ    250

RADANOVICH, GEORGE
HOUSE Republican CA   2,000

MENENDEZ, ROBERT
SENATE Democrat NJ    4,123

MENENDEZ, ROBERT
SENATE Democrat NJ    3,500

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Ertugun
    August 6th, 2008 at 00:05
    Reply | Quote | #1

    For all those ignorant foreigners who don’t understand the American political system, financial contributions to political campaigns is a standard practice so there is nothing new here in this article.  Check out any industry and you will see millions of dollars that have been donated.  The Turkish government itself, illegally funnels a lot of money to political campaigns because it is illegal for foreigners to contribute to U.S. elections.  But as revealed in the media, the Turkish governement funneled hundreds of thousands of dollars in cash into House Speaker Dennis Hastert’s campaign many years to get him to kill the Armenian Genocide resolution.  Why don’t you go investigate that fact.

  2. hyola
    August 6th, 2008 at 00:32
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Interesting post by Ertugun - and what do you know it’s factually accurate.  I love it - it echoes the same themes we saw last year with the Armenian Genocide resolution - the opposition/denialists vitcimizing AMERICAN citizens for appealing to their elected officials to recognize this horrible crime against humanity.  While FOREIGN governments were buying their way in to the issue (usually illegally as the above post references) and artificially swaying officials as a foreign government should not really have any say over domestically and democratically elected Members of Congress…

    Keep it coming

  3. Hally
    August 6th, 2008 at 01:04
    Reply | Quote | #3

    How utterly ironic.

    Who are you calling an "ignorant foreigner" Ertugun?  What kind of a weird twisted bigot are you?  Have you ever heard the term  self-hatred?

    And, the beauty of your post is that you actually admit it’s an industry, the Armenian genocide industry making campaign contributions to get what it wants; created by profiteers and opportunists for monetary and other material gain.  Hrant Dink was right, the diaspora has made itself sick.

    You guys talk big but offer no proof–zero, zip, nada.  Just the usual nonsense.

  4. hyola
    August 6th, 2008 at 01:29
    Reply | Quote | #4

    Ad hominem makes for good drama but doesn’t prove much Hally.

  5. Hally
    August 6th, 2008 at 01:34
    Reply | Quote | #5

    hyo,

    Word of advice:  look up the definition of big words that you think may impress before using them so that you use them accurately instead of ending up looking like a fool.

    Bigot may be a small word, but clearly you need to look that one up too.

    Good luck.

  6. hyola
    August 6th, 2008 at 01:44
    Reply | Quote | #6

    It’s not a "big" word - why are you so angry by the way?  I took the liberty of defining it for you below courtesy of Merriam-Webster.com.  You referred to the original poster as a twisted bigot without addressing the contentions proffered.  That is what ad hominem means…
    Main Entry: 1ad ho·mi·nem Pronunciation: \(ˈ)ad-ˈhä-mə-ˌnem, -nəm\ Function: adjective Etymology: New Latin, literally, to the person Date: 1598 1 : appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect 2 : marked by or being an attack on an opponent’s character rather than by an answer to the contentions made

    It’s ok keep it coming - the only way to beat denial is to call it out in every single place it rears its head.  Here is some nice reading for y’all:http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/10/17/asia/lobby.php

  7. Hally
    August 6th, 2008 at 02:37
    Reply | Quote | #7

    Hahaha!!  Ohmygosh, I haven’t laughed this hard for a while.

    Sweatpea, look up bigot, then re-read your pal E’s first post. 

    Then ponder this statement of fact:  "labeling foreigners ignorant is bigotry."

    If you like filling in the blank, think about this one: 

    "Calling foreigners ignorant when you are one yourself is ____________."

  8. Hyola
    August 6th, 2008 at 07:02
    Reply | Quote | #8

    What did you think of the article showing lobbying efforts and money to Congressmen to deny the Armenian Genocide?

  9. Elif
    August 6th, 2008 at 13:21
    Reply | Quote | #9

    Guys, what Kemal is trying to show here is this genocide issue is far from being discussed in international historical conventions where events of before, during and after 1915 can really be revealed. Instead this issue is highly  politicized that history is being rewritten over and over again by politicians just to get concessions from Turkey time and again or to get votes from American Armenians.

    Armenia can not even open its own Dashnak acrhives, or won’t, which will only support the fact that there is no genocide and even then puts a condition on opening the archives whereby it wants Turkey to open its borders (meanwhile this is a very nice bluff since it well knows that Turkey will not open its borders while Armenia is invading Azerbaijan). Everything here is related to money, land, economy or votes.

    If you are after the truth only, then you should find unbiased documents for yourselves to read where you remove yourselves from this anti-Turkish propaganda painted by this hatred ideology.

    Turkey, to contrary what the genocide supporters are so intensely trying to picture it as, is far from spending millions of dollars on these accusations. In Turkey, people are so ignorant about this issue (unfortunately we do not have a diaspora like Armenians). They lead their normal lives.

    Turkey is not putting any economical pressure on countries not to pass this genocide legislation from their parliaments because it is this so-called ‘undeniable fact’ , western countries are using these accusations against Turkey to get concessions out of Turkey.
    If Turkey was such a strong country economically as the Armenian Diaspora is trying to show it is, believe me it would not have this GDP per person, this high unemployment ratio or the most espensive oil price in the whole wide world.

  10. Elif
    August 6th, 2008 at 13:47

    Oh by the way, if you are being accused of a crime you did not commit in the first place, of course you are going to defend yourself.

    Armenian Diaspora trying to rewrite history so intensely and giving leverage to some countries against Turkey and then Turkey coming and defending itself does not mean that there is a genocide. Many Armenians use this approach of, ‘Ooh Turkey is denying so there is a genocide’.

    When you are held charges against for a crime you did not commit, you try to prove your innocence until you will be forced to accept that you are guilty out of torture. This is not denial. This is self defense. Denial is what Armenian Diaspora is showing by rejecting Turkish Goverment’s several attempts of discussing the events of 1915 on an international historical platform.

    For today, the torture being applied on Turkey is not that extent but I fear one day Turkey will no longer be able to resist it.

  11. Jason, Managing Editor
    August 6th, 2008 at 14:15

    Elif, the matter about the objectionable user name you pointed out has been taken care of.  I also edited your comment to remove your explanation, so as to deny that commenter the attention they were seeking in the process of your explaining it.

  12. Elif
    August 7th, 2008 at 12:12

    Thanks Jason

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500