Filed under: Aids, Bill Clinton, United States — Michael van der Galien on August 5, 2008 @ 6:00 pm CEST
Days after a major African American AIDS organization complained that the US government is focusing too much of its resources on fighting AIDS abroad instead of at home, former President Bill Clinton announced that his foundation would spend more time and attention on fighting the disease among Americans.
The decision to focus a bit less on Africa and a bit more on America was made based on new data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicating that the U.S. epidemic has been underestimated by 40 percent. He pledged the resources of his charitable foundation to refocus on domestic AIDS.
“For Americans, this should be a wake-up call,” Clinton said, addressing the International AIDS Conference here. “Even as we fight the epidemic globally, we must focus at home. And I intend to do so with my foundation.”
Until now the William J. Clinton Foundation’s HIV/AIDS Initiative spent most of its resources on Africa and the Caribbean.
AIDS activist Phill Wilson immediately told reporters that he was heartened by Clinton’s words (even though specifics are lacking): “I have been extremely disappointed with the Clinton Foundation, especially with it headquartered in Harlem of all places, that it has been silent on this issue,” Wilson said. “I’m very grateful, and it is appropriate that President Clinton is committed to taking this on.”
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
