Turkey’s Ruling AK Party Avoids Ban by One Vote

July 30th, 2008 By: Kemal | Tags:

Incoming breaking news has it that Turkey’s highest court has ruled against closing Turkey’s ruling AK party but cut its state funding by half in response to charges that it threatened the country’s secular regime during its six years in power.

Closing the AK Party required an affirmative vote by seven of the eleven Constitutional judges hearing the case.  In the end, six justices voted in favor of banning the party, four voted for financial penalties and one justice rejected the case.

 According to a court spokesman and one law professor, the ruling is not a complete vindication, but a stern warning to the ruling party.

“There is no verdict on closure because the seven votes required by the constitution for closure were not reached,” the spokesman, Hasim Kilic, said. “However, in this ruling, a serious warning has been issued to the party, and I hope this conclusion will be evaluated and actions will be taken accordingly.” 

“This ruling doesn’t mean that the party has been cleared of charges,” said Mithat Sancar, a law professor of Ankara University. “Cutting the party’s treasury funds means that the evidence for their anti-secular activity was there but not substantial enough to impose a ban. Therefore they warned the party to be careful in their actions to avoid closure in the future.”

And, here’s an interesting note about the indictment against the AK Party which was included in the NY Times.

Mr. Erdogan, the indictment said, had bragged that he was co-chairman of the ”Middle East Initiative,” which it called ”a U.S. project aimed at installing moderate Islamic regimes in countries.”

The question now is will the AK Party respond to the warning given?  

Rather than continuing to engage in the “us v. them” rhetoric by calling those who want to maintain Turkey’s secular democracy intact “secular elitists”, will the AK Party move to heal the divide they’ve sewn?  And yes, they have been primarily responsible for sewing the divide.  Last year, many of those that the AK Party now call “secular elitists” actually supported them based on the AK Party’s message of moderation.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Elif
    July 31st, 2008 at 23:30
    Reply | Quote | #1

    They should take it seriously Kemal, there is no other alternative for them. Otherwise I do not think that army will take it any easy.

    The result in my opinion is the best that could come out, a clear warning to the party without undermining the 47% who voted for the party.

    Suppose one minute that the party was closed, there would be this Güneş Party (or in whatever name it would be) popping out of nowhere being puppeted by Erdoğan in the background until he would serve his period of being banned from politics and they would get a lot of sempathy votes at the same time. Nothing would change much for Turkey, rather it would go worse because of the seperation between AK Part supporters and opponents.

    At least now they can not play the victim and have to take responsibility of their actions.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500