On the Stevens Indictment

July 30th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

The Stevens indictment may very well cost the Republican Party dearly. Not for the first time, Republicans give people the impression that when it comes to corruption, etc. they are not only not better than Democrats but possibly even worse.

Will the Republican Party as a whole be held responsible for the crimes of one individual? Or will voters consider Stevens to be a crooked politician and not specifically a crooked Republican?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Orson Buggeigh
    July 30th, 2008 at 21:06
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Hard to say. I think there is a great deal of ‘Bush Fatigue,’ and that will probably carry over in the form of Democratic gains.  But general condemnation of the GOP as corrupt?  Well, the Dems have plenty of their own to worry about.  "Freezer" Jefferson’s penchant for cold cash comes to mind.  I’d say the big question will be how his party colleagues treat him if he is convicted - if they drop him, the party may not have too much to worry about. 

  2. Tully
    July 30th, 2008 at 23:45
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Don’t forget Freezer Jefferson’s long list of relatives being indicted for swindling federal grant money.

  3. Michael Merritt
    July 30th, 2008 at 23:57
    Reply | Quote | #3

    I think Orson says it well; it depends on how the Republicans treat it.  What’s gotten them in the past (and lost them control in 2006) is that for past scandals, they had a tendency to try and cover it up.  I also think indictments of people like Tom Delay have also hurt, as well as Katrina et. al., but I’d say the cover-ups probably did the most damage, as it showed corruption within the Republican ranks.

    In the U.S. more than in some other countries, an individual scandal doesn’t necessarily mean woes for the entire party, but I have observed a noticeable trend (at least since I’ve started following politics closely) of people correlating individual scandals with behavior from the entire party.  For example, failure of the Democratic leaders to pass their mandated agenda will eventually end up hurting the party as a whole.

    So, yes, an indictment can end up hurting the party as a whole, but it all depends on how the Republicans deal with it, and any knowledge the leaders may of had of what he’s being charged on.  While an indictment is not a conviction, I’d suggest Republicans start distancing themselves now.

    Lets face it; three months to election day is not the time you want to start sticking up for somebody who may eventually be convicted of a crime.

  4. Chris
    July 31st, 2008 at 00:45
    Reply | Quote | #4

    OK, it should look like this

    Unfortunately everyone is being polite right now.  It seems a good opportunity for McCain to bring out his "anti-pork" shtik.  He probably won’t because he’s on that tightrope of not upsetting the Republican base and also appealing to independents.

  5. Interested
    July 31st, 2008 at 06:53
    Reply | Quote | #5

    yeah depends how they play it.  The media doesn’t care much about the Democrats corruption - and probably wont for a bit longer.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500