The Republicans’ New Strategy for Independent Votes?

Filed under: Feature, John McCain, Republicans — Michael Merritt on July 18, 2008 @ 1:59 am CEST

I come home from work today and checked my mail and noticed that I got a mail from John McCain and the Republican National Committee. This wasn’t unexpected to me. As an Independent, I know Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, et. al would love to get my vote. I was annoyed two years ago when I got endless calls on my cell phone (which was on the Do-Not-Call list at the time) from the RNC urging me to vote Rob Simmons in my House district. I think the Republicans may have gotten that message, and changed strategy. So, a mailing campaign seems fair and smart

Until I found out how that strategy may have changed.

When I came home from college, I had to mail in a new voter registration form. I’m done with college now, so I can no longer vote in my old precinct. When re-registering, I made it a point to make sure my form said that I did not wish to be affiliated with a party. When I got the confirmation from my town, it also noted this. So, there is no way I can be anything other than an Independent. So, I started scratching my head when I saw these.

Carly Fiorina Intro LetterCarly Fiorina Survey Letter

When I saw the first letter, I started wondering, “Is this some kind of new appeal to Independents by McCain and the Republicans? Make them try to feel like they’re a part of the group?” By the time I got to the second letter I began wondering if it was a clerical mistake.

First off, besides my own blog, here at Poligazette, and some intermittent debates/discussions with my friends and my father and grandfather, I don’t actually have much political involvement. I’ve never worked for a campaign; heck, I’ve never even donated to one. The campaign and the RNC claim the letter (and the survey included with it) are only sent to a select number of people who have a good deal of political involvement. If blogger is involvement to the Republicans, then fine, blogging is involvement. Yet, the key part is the second phrase of the sentence, “commitment to the Republican party.”

Problem: I’ve never been a Republican. As I noted in one of my first entries here, I was originally a Democrat who quickly switched to no affiliation due to my dislike of both major parties. I have no Republican street cred of which to speak. So, this is why I think it’s a clerical error. Yet, how can you mess this up?

The RNC is clearly getting records from towns all across the nation of voters’ party registrations (the fact my information is being shared with someone without my consent is another issue). How can you mess this up? My name has to be listed somewhere in whatever they use for a database of Independents. If this letter really is meant to go out to those who’ve shown leadership in the Republican party, I shouldn’t have gotten it.

So, that kind of brings me back full circle to the Independent appeal theory. Could this be a way to try and get Independents? I’m not sure, but maybe. As I mentioned before, included with the letters in a survey with a number of questions about the issues of our time. Interestingly, the questions are worded in a way that is definitely biased toward Republican interests, which isn’t surprising. I’d expect no less of a DNC-backed survey as well. So, that kind of makes me think again of an error.

Note that I’m not offended of being called a Republican. I’m actually kind of flattered that they think of me as part of their party, and an involved leader in it no less. Makes me feel kind of special they think of me that way. The ball’s in your court now, Democrats. What am I to you?

On a final note, I point your attention to the first letter by McCain, where he introduced Carly Fiorina. I have never seen quite as much praise toward somebody. Could this mean Fiorina could expect big things in the near future? Time will tell.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

3 Comments »

  1. 1 Kevin H

    July 18, 2008 @ 2:36 am CEST

    Recently, I’ve gotten a lot of phone calls from political groups asking me to come down and help, or to donate. One guy actually harrased me for awhile, but that’s another rant.

    Anyways, so one of these times a guy asked me to donate and I said, "I’m sorry, I don’t donate very much" and he said "no, i have you on the list right here, $2,000, $500, $1000…" I informed him I’m a student and in no place to make those type of donations, and that he must be mistaken. He sounded honestly confused and I said goodbye. What I think happened is that there is a person with the same name as me who has donated a large amount of money, that list gets cross referenced with local voting registration records, and so they get my phone number and someone else’s donation history. So maybe there is another Michael Merritt out there chanting the praises of GWB and giving the party lots of money.

  2. 2 Michael Merritt

    July 19, 2008 @ 1:08 am CEST

    Yea, that could be the case.  I don’t know of anybody with my name around this area, though there is/used to be another group of Merritts in my town, and further out, there are more in my state and northward in Mass.

  3. 3 Interested

    July 19, 2008 @ 4:35 am CEST

    The RNC is clearly getting records from towns all across the nation of voters’ party registrations

    I got a similar thing from good ole HRC.   of all insulting things like I’d vote for her.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim) or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Eric Dondero: If you vote for Sarah Palin YOU ARE VOTING 3RD PARTY.  She’s a libertarian Republican. ...
  • AlexP1: …So, 40 year old history is now news….The Vietnam War as a travesty in this nation back then, so...
  • David: Thanks Michael.  I read your site nearly every day, but I don’t always have time to comment.
  • Jay_C: I’m still holding on to hope, but I’d like to see things getting better, not worse.
  • Michael: Wow… the bailout worked as expected… Like pouring gasoline on a fire… Let me guess…...

Partners

 

Your Ad Here