The New Reality in Iraq… But

Filed under: Feature, General News — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on July 17, 2008 @ 5:00 pm CEST

All of the most important objectives of the surge have been accomplished in Iraq. The sectarian civil war is ended; al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) has been dealt a devastating blow; and the Sadrist militia and other Iranian-backed militant groups have been disrupted.’

Meanwhile, the Iraqi government has accomplished almost all of the legislative benchmarks set by the U.S. Congress and the Bush administration. More important, it is gaining wider legitimacy among the population. The attention of Iraqis across the country is focused on the upcoming provincial elections, which will be a pivotal moment in Iraq’s development.

The above is indeed very important, but the main question remains unanswered: is Iraq’s culture changing so drastically that a free and liberal democracy can truly flourish in this country?

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

3 Comments »

  1. 1 Kemal

    July 17, 2008 @ 7:22 pm CEST

    Right, and five years ago, Bush declared "Mission accomplished!"

    Meanwhile this just in: 
    Car bombing kills 18 people in Iraq

    BAGHDAD — A car bomb killed at least seven children and 11 other people in a northern city, providing a reminder that militants still can cause casualties despite security improvements that led U. S. troops to return a southern province to Iraqi control Wednesday.

    Ninety people also were injured in the blast at a popular outdoor market in Tal Afar, said a police official, who insisted on anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media.

    Is this some kind of a sick joke by the WSJ?

  2. 2 RRRocks

    July 17, 2008 @ 9:49 pm CEST

      If one car bomb in an entire nation means the war is lost then you are right the war is lost and we should come home now.

     

     

  3. 3 Kevin H

    July 17, 2008 @ 9:55 pm CEST

    The Sadrist Militia wasn’t ‘disrupted’ they choose to attempt a peaceful political consolidation of power instead of a military based one. They are still not friendly to the west, and quite theocratic in ideology, and last I heard (which I admit was while ago) they looked like the big winner in the upcoming provincial elections.

    The WSJ is right that those elctions will be a pivotal moment for Iraq, but I fear that the WSJ will simply read what they want to from them, and not take a deep look at what happened and help us to figure out the direction in which Iraq is heading.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim) or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Steve: No more First Amendment? — that is why Americans have a Second Amendment. Thugs may try to stiffle my...
  • Jay_C: I am forced to agree with this: " But compared to the cost of a depression, it’s still a steal at...
  • Jay_C: Question about this…The bailout failed the first time it was brought to the House.  Since the...
  • David: Welcome to socialism being shoved down the throat of a free market capitalistic economy. No one seems to be...
  • Eric Dondero: If you vote for Sarah Palin YOU ARE VOTING 3RD PARTY.  She’s a libertarian Republican. ...

Partners

 

Your Ad Here