Mortgage Scandal a Bipartisan Affair

Filed under: Feature, General News — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on July 15, 2008 @ 8:00 pm CEST

Of course the mortgage scandal and problems are a ‘bipartisan affair.’ As Froma Harrop points out, every single person was more than willing to use the housing bubble in an attempt to make a quick buck.

For instance Republicans: they had indeed always argued that the free market should do its work. If you let it do what it naturally does, mistakes will be corrected. Where there is a bubble, the market will correct itself and those who gambled or were simply acting stupid will suffer the consequences of their actions. That’s cold, yes, but it does ensure that people will not make the same mistake twice. Additionally, letting the market do what it does best would create a natural situation, which is most healthy for everyone, especially for the economy as a whole.

Or so Republicans have argued for decades.

But now that the market is actually correcting itself, Republicans suddenly say that the government should act. ‘Were the officials true free-marketeers, they would have let Bear Stearns go splat. They’d have stayed aloof to the panic surrounding Fannie and Freddie. They’d just let market forces do their job — and then usher in another Great Depression,’ Harrop writes.

No, instead of letting the above happen, Republicans advocated helping those companies out.

Democrats haven’t been any better. They complain now that George W. Bush ignored potential problems, but they were not willing to do anything about it years ago either. The reason, well one of the reasons, was that these companies made a lot of money which meant that they also had to pay a lot of taxes. The more taxes, the merrier Democrats seem to have thought.

As usual, both sides try to blame each other, while both sides are partially to blame.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

4 Comments »

  1. 1 Bob A

    July 15, 2008 @ 8:26 pm CEST

    Ah.. its being called for what it is.. a scandal first, a crisis second.

  2. 2 Chuck Norton

    July 16, 2008 @ 1:46 am CEST

    Michael - Government sorda has to act - why? It is government regulation and taxes that have caused a great deal of this problem. Laws such as the Community Reinvestment Act etc that force lenders to give marginal loans on properties that have declining values to avoid "red-lining" and charges of racism. What lenders do is make the loans that they KNOW are VERY risky to keep the feds coming down on them, and then they sell these loans to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and walla - they fail as property taxes go up and energy and food prices go up and causing an overdue housing adjustment to become a full fledged crash.  Banks keep most of the good loans and dump the bad ones to Freddie and Fannie.

  3. 3 Michael Merritt

    July 16, 2008 @ 4:36 am CEST

    I found it interesting that the government is so willing to keep these lenders propped up.  Just proves that neither party can actually claim true fiscal conservativeness.

    I remember during the whole Bear Stearns fiasco, some of the far-right economic conservatives were screaming their heads off at the involvement of the government.

  4. 4 Interested

    July 16, 2008 @ 1:07 pm CEST

    Lets just get Europe to bail us out, they can set up a relief fund and just send over the money.  Later we can complain that they didn’t send enough.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • kbn: Lets not forget to pray for our political leaders to make the right decisions. What is wrong with these...
  • Ron Paulian: George Washington warned of entangling alliances; perhaps he was referring to the entangling alliances...
  • Interested: And it’s also the sort of gaffe that feeds into fears about McCain’s age…ie is his memory starting...
  • Interested: fire both of them would be fine for me. Stewart’s humor isn’t particularly intelligent, and...
  • Jason, Managing Editor: The line between nepotism and mentoring seems unclear to me, at least in political...

Partners