Third Party Roundup

July 11th, 2008 By: Michael Merritt | Tags:

Starting with this election, I have become very interested in the various third parties in the United States. I became an Independent because I was disgusted with the state of the two party system and the two parties that were propping up and maintaining that system. Still, that doesn’t mean I’m unwilling to hear what parties have to say. So, I’ve spent a great deal of time following them, as well as Indpendent candidates.

In this entry, I give a pretty thorough roundup of who’s running for these third parties, as well as explaining what the parties are all about, and my take on the candidates’ chances.

Libertarian Party

Bob BarrWayne Allyn Root Everybody’s been talking about the Libertarians these days for one reason. Their candidate is former Georgia Republican Congressman Bob Barr. The hoopla in the media, anyway, is that even if he won’t win, he could cause an upset to John McCain’s chances for winning the presidency. Barr’s candidacy caused a minor controversy earlier this year, because Barr has traditionally been known as one of the most socially conservative Republicans; he’s been a leader in the War on Drugs, and was the author of the Defense of Marriage Act, both things which the Libertarians tend to oppose.

The Libertarians definitely would like to make an electoral impact, and my thinking is that nominating Barr might be opportunity to do it. He’s definitely not going to win, but consider the choice. Barr announces his nomination with about a week to go to the convention, and he nearly instantly becomes the front-runner. He had been a regional representative to the Libertarian National Committee for a while by that time, but I don’t think he’d have been that big of a leader. So why the nomination?

For some time, there has been an effort by some Libertarians to open up the party to a more widespread audience. Those who want less government overall, but may not be as isolationist in foreign policy, or as opposed to corporate regulation. These efforts have been represented by groups such as the Libertarian Reform Caucus, and I think the end results of such reforms may be a Bob Barr candidacy. Certainly Barr’s own reform has been rapid. I’d say he just about ties the record with Mitt Romney on speed of position changes.

So, I think that Barr is the Libertarian’s candidate because they think that with him, they may not win, but will get their name out their and be able to build on that. Barr’s running mate is Wayne Allyn Root, a TV host and producer. Like Barr, I think Root is less radical than some other Libertarians, which could explain why he was chosen.

Overall, I think the Libertarians may end up making a slight dent in the popular vote of John McCain, which may or may not lose him the election. According to the latest Zogby poll, Barr is clocking in at 6% nationwide. The election is 4 months away, but I think McCain and the Republicans need to be keeping an eye on this number in the run up to the convention.

Green Party

Rosa ClementeCynthia McKinneyFormer Georgia Democratic Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney garnered 304.5 votes in Green Party primaries, and was officially nominated at the party’s convention on July 12th with a grand total of 313.  Also ranking in the votes was Ralph Nader, with 139, even though Nader isn’t officially campaigning as a Green this year.  Nader eventually came out with 86.5 votes.  The Vice Presidential candidate is journalist and community organizer Rosa Clemente.

I think the large vote for McKinney has some of the same reasoning as Barr: Name recognition. McKinney may not be a huge name, but she was a very vocal anti-Iraq war activist during her time in Congress. Then she got into a minor scandal when she struck a police officer at the Capitol after he tried to stop her because he wasn’t able to identify her. Yet, McKinney has been quite well known for her unabashed liberal political views and anti-Bush rhetoric. So, views that match many Green platforms plus name recognition and experience as a Congresswoman equal a winner in my book.

I haven’t been able to find any polls that include the Green Party, and probably won’t be able to until after the nomination is over. So, I’ll reserve judgment on McKinney’s chances until I do.

The rest of these parties are, I believe, unlikely to have a large impact in this election, but I’ll include a brief summary of their candidates for completion purposes.

Constitution Party

Chuck BaldwinDarrell CastleThe Constitution Party has nominated activist and pastor Chuck Baldwin for the presidency. His running mate is attorney Darrell Castle. Castle is definitely both an economically and socially conservative candidate, but has also had some praise for both Ron Paul and Bob Barr, which is a little strange, given their more socially liberal leanings, except Paul’s pro-life stance (Barr appears to be mum on this these days). Constitution party candidates are socially conservative as well as fiscally conservative. To that extent, Baldwin also praised Alan Keyes, the former Assistant Secretary of State under Reagan and former opponent to Barack Obama for the Illinois Senate seat Obama now holds.

Prohibition Party

LeRoy PlettenGene Admonson Weak in politics today, but a forced to be reckoned with in the late 19th century and was part of the reason for the Prohibition era in American life from 1919-1931. In 2008, the Prohibition Party has nominated landscape painter, woodcarver, and minister Gene Amondson as their nominee. Amondson is also the party chair. The VP running mate is Leroy Pletten.

Socialist Party USA

Brian MooreStewart Alexander On the socialist front, that party has nominated community developer Brian Moore and automobile sales consultant Stewart Alexander for VP. The Socialist Party broke away of the Socialist Part of America (of Eugene Debs fame) in 1972. They oppose both capitalism and authoritarian-style communism, but still call for public and worker control of business, a classless society, and abolition of the death penalty, among other platforms. On how these things should be achieved, the party isn’t unified. Some call for evolutionary style changes, while other favor a more revolutionary approach.

Party of Socialism and Liberation

Eugene PuryearGloria LaRiva

The Party of Socialism and Liberation seems to advocate a platform more radical than that of the Socialist Part USA. It is a Marxist-Leninist party that advocates revolutionary change. Among other things, it supports the government of Cuba, the Chinese revolution, and the Bolivarian revolution of Venezuala. It also calls for the release of the “Cuban Five,” who were convicted of espionage in 2001. The PSL considers them political prisoners. In 2008, PSL has nominated activist Gloria LaRiva for president and activist Eugene Puryear for VP.

Socialist Workers Party

Roger CaleroAlyson KennedyThe SWP is a Trotskyist communist party that once was the largest promoter of the ideology in the USA, but now is very small. I can’t find any specific platform for the issue, but I assume it’s not too different than the PSL above. This year, the SWP is running journalist Róger Calero. Apart from every other candidate profiled here, Calero is the only one who cannot constitutionally become president. Calero was born in Nicaragua in 1965, and fled to the U.S. with his family in 1985 and is now a permanent resident. His VP running mate is garment worker Alyson Kennedy.

Boston Tea Party

Tom KnappCharles Jay Yes, that is seriously its name. Formed in 2006 as a breakaway from the Libertarian Party, the BTP seems to have been formed in response to the LP’s reformation from the radical party of old to the more mainstream party it currently is (mainstream as in not as radical). Its main platforms are basically the same as the Libertarians, but is more rigid in its pursuit of them. This year, the party is running boxing manager and spokeman Charles Jay and the VP candidate is party founder Thomas Knapp.

Reform Party

Ted WeillFrank McEnultyOnce a party on the rise with one of the most successful third party candidates in recent history, Ross Perot, the Reform Party had a lot of trouble getting back on its feet after Perot left the party following the 1996 elections.  They ran Pat Buchanan in 2000, but he failed to garner a significant amount of the vote.  The Reform Party has been more successful on a state and local level, with its highest profile politician coming in the form of former wrestler Jesse Ventura as Governor of Minnesota.  After endorsing Nader in 2004 (he was an Independent), the Reform Party is back with its own candidates.  Two businessmen are running for the top office this time: Ted Weill for President and Frank McEnulty for Vice President (McEnulty is also running as President for the New American Independent Party).
That’s it for now, unless more parties get ballot status somewhere. Still, most of these parties have not made ballot status in many states. I only profiled ones that have made ballot status in at least one state. Let me know if I’m missing any. Finally, I didn’t include parties that have crossed endorsed a candidate profiled here or are not actively pursuing ballot access in other states.

Originally posted: 7/11/08; Updates: 7/30/08

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Atlee Yarrow
    July 11th, 2008 at 12:22
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Have you made up you mind? There are also other style parties like the Social Democratic Party of America.

  2. Bob
    July 11th, 2008 at 17:35
    Reply | Quote | #2

    I really don’t think Barr will do much on a national scale. Probably the best he can do is take votes away in Georgia which would force McCain to spend money there. But I also am curious if McKinney will get any votes in Georgia since she is from there too. They might just counteract eachother’s votes.

    Also I have heard Barr in interviews mention he is pro-life and that the Libertarian is more diverse on this subject now.

    I remember there being a website for Christian Democratic Union awhile ago. It wasn’t really a party though just an idea.

    Looking at the list makes me reaffirm that the US will never have a viable third party just the occasional Presidential spoilers and a few local officials.

  3. abel
    July 12th, 2008 at 06:02
    Reply | Quote | #3

    where is ralph Nader on the list 

  4. Michael Merritt
    July 12th, 2008 at 06:06
    Reply | Quote | #4

    I knew I should have mentioned something about that in my post.  Nader isn’t running as a third-party candidate, but as an Independent.  This post was only about those running in a party.

    Fear not.  An entry on Nader is coming soon enough.

  5. Mike
    August 5th, 2008 at 18:50
    Reply | Quote | #5

    McKinney "got into a minor scandal when she struck a police officer at the Capitol after he tried to stop her because he was not able to identify her." A Grand Jury exonerated McKinney when it dropped the charge. While McKinney apologized on the House floor that such an incident ever occurred, she never admitted to "striking" the officer, though it was clear that the officer had in fact grabbed her from behind, as confirmed by the Chief of Police. Why does everyone repeat the charge against McKinney as fact when the charge was dismissed? Would that happen to a white congresswoman?

  6. Michael Merritt
    August 7th, 2008 at 07:23
    Reply | Quote | #6

    As far as I can tell, Mike, she never denied it either.

    And don’t try the race card on me.  I’ve got nothing against McKinney, and only wish her the best in her run for office.

  7. Bonnie Jean
    September 9th, 2008 at 05:17
    Reply | Quote | #7

    LADIES:  

    Beware of Gene Amondson, the Prohibition Party Presidential Candidate for 2004 and 2008.  This guy is a certified nut and con artist who has his profile posted on http://www.ChristianCafe.com under "PreacherGene713". 

    He claims he’s looking for a mate, but I personally found out he uses women  involved in Christian Singles Ministries, telling them to NOT tell their Pastor they know him, but to invite him to speak at their Church (for a FEE, of course). 

    I had one phone conversation with this man:  he was extremely VULGAR and didn’t ONLY slander the reputation of the head of Trinity Broadcasting Network to me, he slandered other Christian Churches.  He also told me, "Don’t be concerned about all the SEX that’s going on in Christian Ministries, because after all, we all are animals."  Afterwards, I sent him a note, telling him to NEVER contact me again either in writing or by phone, and I explained why!  I BLOCKED him from connecting me through the Christian Singles website, so he got my cell phone number from his Caller ID and left me an extremely NASTY message on there, saying it was a good thing I never let him see my PHOTO because he was CERTAIN I must be chubby and ugly, and he told me I should join eHarmony because they get millions of dollars for helping chubby, ugly women find their mates!  I am neither chubby nor ugly, and I will make certain the media hears the phone message he left on my cell phone! 

    This man who CLAIMS he’s a "Christian Minister", who wears a white collar with a black Minister’s shirt, is one of those FALSE PROPHETS the Bible talks about in the final days before Jesus returns:  Gene Amonds DOESN’T works for GOD; he works for SATAN!  

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500