Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe Accepts Turkish Thesis Re. Armenian ‘Genocide’
Good news for Turkey, and for those who believe that what happened to the Armenians does not or at least may not constitute genocide and that Armenians should open their archives to historians: the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe agrees. The OSCE is the biggest international organization behind the United Nations. As such, this is a big victory for the Turks and, as far as I am concerned, for the truth.
55 states have joined the OSCE in recent decades. The list of the member states can be found here. The Netherlands is a member, Germany is a member, Turkey is a member, Belarus is, Belgium is as well, the USA is, and so is the UK. It’s a gigantic organization, and quite an important one at that.
The Turks wanted the general assembly to adopt a motion it submitted about the genocide allegations. The motion dismisses the allegations, saying that historians should decide whether something constitutes genocide or not, and calls on all groups and countries involved to open their archives to said historians for research. Turkey opened its archives years ago already, whereas Armenia and Armenian organizations refuse to do so (probably because the archives prove the Turkish charges that Armenians committed some serious ethnic cleansing themselves and because these archives may very well disprove the charge of genocide… disproving it by Armenians).
Alaattin Buyukkaya, who leads the Turkish group at the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, told reporters Wednesday: “The OSCE is the biggest international organization behind the United Nations. Adoption of the Turkish thesis by the OSCE is a significant achievement against the Armenian allegations. Also, the Turkish thesis regarding the events of 1915 was adopted for the first time on an international platform. The OSCE has 56 member states. Only
“The motion says that the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly encourages the formation of joint history commissions by historians and experts from the third countries in case of a research into political and military archives to scientifically and unbiasedly enlighten a disputed period in history in an effort to serve transparency and common understanding among the member states,” Buyukkaya added.
This is a significant victory for the no-genocide side. More organizations and countries, I am sure, will follow in future years. Lets not forget that the European Union too changed its official position on the events of 1915. The Union too wants all those involved to open the archives so that historians can do research and cast judgment. This is something Armenian activists are trying to prevent. And desperately so.
The reason? Simple. Lands and money. For Armenian activists and the Armenian government, this isn’t about ethnic cleansing of genocide; it’s about lands and financial compensation (take a look at the Armenian constitution I’d say; the Armenians still claim Eastern Anatolia as part of Armenia).









The OSCE is the biggest international organization behind the United Nations…55 states have joined the OSCE in recent decades.
There is at least one international organisation bigger than the OSCE. The Organisation of the Islamic Conference has 57 member states.
@ Dylan
The Islamic COnference is probably bigger than OSCE but the level of cooperation between the states is very low…
I’m from Indonesia, and we never know what membership in OIC brings.
It’s time for the politicians to back off! and the historians to do their belated job!!! The truth will prevail….
Yes, the Western World is really in for some surprises when the effect of the Ignorant Vote-Hungry politicians is removed from the equation and when the self-proclaimed Genocide "Scholars" are exposed for the flakes and hacks that many of them really are! The temptation has proven all to strong for a significant number of these individuals who see a life of relative ignominy as the alternative, to prostitute their talents and qualifications to the greed and ambition of the powerful Armenian Propagandists who extend an open offer of a "reputation" and "standing" to any taker who will lend some measure of validation to their deceitful lies!
This motion, as described, does not amount to an acceptance of the Turkish thesis. It amounts to a call for further scientific "debate" or whatever deniers wish to call it. Logically speaking, not accepting the Armenian thesis in explicit terms does not by any stretch of the imagination mean acceptance of the Turkish thesis. What a so-so attempt at deception Michael, c’mon, we all expect better from you. That this is even an important piece of news in the Turkish world is very, very sad. Great victory guys. Go get ‘em. The world will soon…umm…defer to your incorrect views. Yeah right.
Whopppyyy! That famous word "Deniers" came up again! How uncreative and predictable your comments have become. Come onnnn people!!! come up with more creative ways to push your agenda… What a bore…..
Ara, they reject your conclusion without unbiased research of all relevant archives, including those still concealed by Armenia and the Dashnak revolutionary party.
Turkey should think wisely before distributing baklava after each event like this! look to the big picture, Obama is coming to the White House next year, and the Turkish position among the Europeans is weakening every time the Armenian Genocide denial floats on surface. A joint historian commission that the Turks are calling for a while is not going to add any value to the tenths of archives which are already open and clearly identifies the Armenian killing as a ‘Genocide’.
The motion says to research political and military archives to scientifically and unbiasedly enlighten a disputed period in history in an effort to serve transparency and common understanding among the member states. There is nothing wrong with that, its a very improving motion. I don’t understand why Armenia voted against it -and its the only one among 55 other states- I found this very suspicious.
The reason? Simple. Lands and money.
That’s right.
"Dear compatriots, against Turkey, we will continue to organize ourselves. We will organize so as to be better prepared to mobilize. We will mobilize to better acheive our goals and gains. Not only for the recognition of the genocide, but also for the construction of a free, independent and reunified Armenia, so that all together we can again take posession of Van, Much, Kars, Sassun, Bitlis and Erzurum."
Mourad Papazian, chief of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation for Western Europe, speech in Marseille, April 24, 2006 (http://www.turquieeuropeenne.eu/spip.php?page=print&id_article=1261).
"The 18th General Assembly of the Social Democratic Hunchakian Party was held during the last weeks of November in Larnaka, Cyprus. 52 delegates representing 12 adherent part regions participated along with the outgoing Central Executive Board.
[...]
The Assembly reaffirmed the traditional positions of the S. D. Hunchakian Party regarding the Armenian Cause and territorial demands."
http://www.hunchak.org.au/aboutus/historical_Declaration2005.html
See also:
http://setasarmenian.blogspot.com/2007/12/armenians-demand-justice-not.html
Genocide in turkey 1975 , The Union of Armenian Students in Manchester
Yeah. Or how about "Death and Exile: the Ethnic Cleaning of Ottoman Muslims"? You can also read "The Ottoman Peoples and the End of Empire." For instance, the ethnic cleansing committed by the Serbs, Croats and Greek in the Balkans. Millions of Muslims were forced off their lands, out of their homes. If they weren’t killed, they had to flee to Anatolia because the ‘enlightened’ Christian new nation-states tolerated no Muslims living within their borders (this because Muslims formed a majority or at least plurality in all new ’states’).
Perhaps it’s time for you and your buddies to acknowledge the horrible crimes committed by those ‘Christian’ states. Turkish Muslim lives don’t matter. I know.
Logically speaking, not accepting the Armenian thesis in explicit terms does not by any stretch of the imagination mean acceptance of the Turkish thesis.
Accepting the simple facts that the so-called "Armenian genocide" is not supported by unquestionable evidence, and that history is not the job of politicians, is already a snub for the Armenian propaganda.
Why the Armenian delegates were the singles to vote against this resolution, proposed by the Turkish delegates?
Enlevez votre masque, le faux Dussardier, on vous a reconnu.
To the readers: do not pay attention to this post.
Hitler never said "Armenians", he said "no one remembers the massacres "ROMANS" committed…. But then again, no one remembers the extermination of the native Americans by the Americans, or the massacres committed by the French to the Algerians, orrrrr what about what the Belgium’s who committed horrible crimes against the Congolese during the Kind Leopard times…. and my personal favorite: The Spanish/Portuguese wiped out FIVE million indigenous peoples of South America….. YEAH… NO ONE REMEMBERS THEM!!!!! (the list is very long….) anyone with a half brain would see that what the Armenian diaspora is pushing for is LAND AND MONEY….
Hitler never said "Armenians"
Indeed: http://www.ataa.org/reference/hitler-lowry.html
the massacres committed by the French to the Algerians
1) Please do not use the word "the" (the French people was not the French army, and the French massacrors were not the French army).
2) This massacres are not forgotten, and since some years, there exist a little "genocide fanfare" about this, with some pro-Armenian activists. It’s not a surprise, because Soviet propaganda used the atrocities of Algerian war like the events of 1915-1916 and like the Vietnam war.
3) If there are forgotten massacres in Algeria, there are the massacres by the FLN, against French civilans and against moderate separatists (MNA) during the Algerian war (1954-1962); and by the Algerian bands during the XIXth century (until Abd-el-Kader, this bands taked no prisonners: all ennemy captured was killed).
Suggestion of reading to the French-speakers: Daniel Lefeuvre, Pour en finir avec la repentance coloniale, Paris, Flammarion, 2006, new edition, 2008. The commonalities and even the common activists (like Gilles Manceron) between the genocide fanfare and the "algerian fanfare" are very intersting.
Lucrece, my point is, all nations have been involved in some kind of war or killings against another group of people or nation… I am tired of hearing ONLY what the Ottomans/Turks did…. So did the Armenians, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Americans, Australians, Japanese, Greeks, British, Chinese etc etc etc… The international community seems to zoom into the period of 1915 obsessively and forget their own past… When I say "The French", I mean their history…. This is all political. Nothing to do with the reality of humanity. I am talking about HYPOCRISY!!!
We always thought that Armenians not opening their archives has something to do with, something they are hiding,and yes they were the ones strated kiling the Turks first with rebel group called Thaslanaklar,they find Ottoman empire weak after the frist WW and sided with Russians to gain their own province and simply started killing their neighbors ,which they have lived with (Turks)for 100’s of years and now, after seen Jews getting bunch of money (rightfully so )from Germans and Swiss,they wanted to do the same forthemselves by crying foul, and spreading this BIG LIE, unfortunately many countries bought this LIE,or wanted to use it as a political leverage aginst Turks, and saga goes on,dude It is a Big lie,and maybe 100,000 died in the jeurney to Syria,l am sure it was not good but in war anything can happen,thats why we should not have wars,right?
Nevber, please, let’s read again my text, and remember to my previous comments. It is not necessary to get excited like that.
Lucrece; without blasting France, it has to be pointed out that the French army committed some horrible crimes in its colonies. That’s well known, and well documented.
We always thought that Armenians not opening their archives has something to do with, something they are hiding
Of course!
http://www.eraren.org/index.php?Lisan=en&Page=DergiIcerik&IcerikNo=134
http://armenians-1915.blogspot.com/2008/04/2438-armenians-and-ottoman-military.html
maybe 100,000 died in the jeurney to Syria,l am sure it was not good but in war anything can happen,thats why we should not have wars,right?
War was the context of the events of 1915-1916, but this events were not just war incidents, as explains, for example, Guenter Lewy.
The total demographic losses of Ottoman Armenians between 1914 and 1919 (including the deaths during the relocation by Russians) are around 640-650 000 individuals, i. e. 37% of the pre-war population. It is less than the claims of activist, it is certainly not a genocide, but it is not ordinary losses of war.
Lucrece; without blasting France, it has to be pointed out that the French army committed some horrible crimes in its colonies. That’s well known, and well documented.
I did say the opposite. I have not forgotten the massacres of Sétif and Guelma, the enfumades of General Bugeaud, the Indochinian atrocities, etc."If France can remain in Indochina only with cutting heads and maintaining a regime of terror and force, it is better we go. (Si la France ne peut rester en Indochine qu’en y coupant des têtes et en y maintenant un régime de terreur et de force, il vaut mieux nous en aller.)" (Marius Moutet, socialist deputy, 1930).
I said that some so-called scholars had used of false arguments and false statistics about this sad events. The conquest war of Algeria was bloody and barbarious, but it was never an attempt of extermination of Algerians, and the atrocities were never committed by one side. The same comments could be made for the war of 1954-1962, all the more since this conflict reached never the level of violence (in both sides) of the nineteenth century.
Sorry: I did not say the opposite.
My point is: Because the International community is only zooming into the events of 1915 and describing it as "genocide", the Armenian Diaspora is using this to their advantage. They are claiming that everybody is on their side. However, the reality is all nations whether European, Ottoman, American, Chinese, Japanese etc have a shady past. Including the Armenians themselves. I am directing my comments to "dussadier" and his like minded colleagues. They are getting a free ride on the European/USA "sympathy" for too long. This needs to be addressed as well. This one sided view needs to be disassembled. I am sorry but the French (government) are the worst of the bunch… and Lucrece, I am not excited I can assure you…..
For instance, the ethnic cleansing committed by the Serbs, Croats and Greek in the Balkans. Millions of Muslims were forced off their lands, out of their homes.
During the Bulgarian war of independence (1876-1878), around 260,000 Muslims (including ethnic Bulgarians converted to Islam) were butchered by the Christian armies and gangs. 550,000 were expelled. Cullen, the British investigator for the Great Powers in Berlin’s conference, wrote: "I can come to no other conclusion but that the Russians are carrying out a fixed policy of exterminating the Moslem race."
Thousands of Jews were killed, tortured or expelled by the same perpetrators during this war.
During the Balkan Wars, i. e. during less than two years (1912-1913), 1,450,000 perished, and 410 000 were expelled.
During the WWI and the Turkish war of Independence, at least 523,955 Muslims were killed by Armenian guerilla, and many others by Greek soldiers and Greek gangs. The total losses of Anatolian Muslims between 1912 and 1922, is at least 2,5 millions, and probably nearly 3 millions. Around 10,000 Ottoman Jews were killed by dashnaks.
Between 1914 and 1921, 410 000 Muslims perished in the Caucasus, including 30,000 Azeris butchered by Armenian gangs during some weeks of 1918; and 270,000 were refugees to the Anatolia. At least 3,000 Mountain Jews were assassinated by dashnak in 1919.
In the province of Erivan (actual Republic of Armenia), there were 270,000 "Turco-Tatars" in 1914, and only 89,000 in 1926.
References: Justin McCarthy, Death and Exile: The Ethnic Cleansing of Ottoman Muslims, Princeton, Darwin Press, pp. 59, 214-217, and 338-339; http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=18594 ; http://www.today.az/news/politics/25410.html ; and http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=18582
Yet again thanks to Mr Van Der Galien previously of the Gallien gazette. A biast article with regard to the Armenian Genocie issue. Mr Gallien who freely admits his love for Turkey, seems to have not grown up yet, how old are you now Mr. Gallien all of 24. How sad that you are still trying to brainwash (like the Turkish Nationalists) readers to your point of view. There is ample information on the Genocide. One thing you never have answered is why was 90% of the Christian assyrian population killed - what threat did they pose to the Young Turks? Genocide is Genocide there are no mitigating circumstances. Historians have discused the issue and like the Chairman of the Institute of Turkish Studies (who ws forced to resign by the Turkish governent) have concluded it was Genocide - Turkey and Mr. Gallien should grow up accept it and move on.
Some sources used by Prof. McCarthy are avaible online and in Western languages:
Russian Atrocities in Asia and Europe during the Month of June, July and August 1877, Istanbul, 1877: http://louisville.edu/a-s/history/turks/Russian%20Atrocities.pdf
The Turco-Armenian Question: The Turkish Point of View, Istanbul, 1919: http://louisville.edu/a-s/history/turks/NC%20of%20Turkey.pdf
Ahmed Rustem Bey, The World War and the Turco-Armenian Question, Berne, 1918: http://louisville.edu/a-s/history/turks/Ahmed%20Rustem.pdf
Kara Schemsi, Turcs et Arméniens devant l’histoire, Geneva, 1919: http://louisville.edu/a-s/history/turks/turcs_et_armeniens.pdf
Greek Atrocities in Turkey, Istanbul, 1921: http://louisville.edu/a-s/history/turks/Greek Atrocities in Turkey.pdf
Victor, what does age have anything to do with this conversation? Are you telling me the Armenian youth younger then 24 do not know anything? Because you seem to think that age is some criteria for knowledge… If so… GREAT! I think just like you do…! The younger generation of the Armenian diaspora is brainwashed and have no clue of their history and culture…
One thing you never have answered is why was 90% of the Christian assyrian population killed - what threat did they pose to the Young Turks?
1) The demographic losses of Assyrian/Nestorian population in Anatolia were not 90% of pre-war population, but far less.
2) At least 3,000 Nestorians joined the Armenian guerilla, only in the vilayet of Van, in 1914/1915 (Justin McCarthy, Esat Arslan, Cemalettin Tashkiran and Ömer Turan, The Armenian Rebellion at Van, Salt Lake city, University of Utah Press, 2006).
3) Nestorian gangs destroyed Kurdish villages, raped women, killed unarmed civilian; after this, Kurdish gangs destroyed Nestorian villages, raped women, killed unarmed civilian; after this (i. e. during the Spring 1916), Nestorian gangs, Dashnaks, Hunchakists and Cossaks exterminated all the Muslims who fell into their hands. This facts are supported by Western investigations (report of British Major E. W. C. Nobel, March 12, 1919, quoted in Guenter Lewy, The Armenian Massacres in Ottoman Turkey. A Disputed Genocide, Salt Lake City, University of Utah Press, 2005, p. 118).
I have forgotten this Western source about Armenian atrocities:
http://louisville.edu/a-s/history/turks/Niles_and_Sutherland.pdf
to Lucrece :
why " To the readers: do not pay attention to this post." ?
the link is very interessant :
Genocide in turkey 1975 , The Union of Armenian Students in Manchester
This post is my post, monsieur 24avril1915, alias Imprescriptible. Je vous ai reconnu, votre style est reconnaissable entre mille (et votre anglais, encore pire que le mien).
Vous etes trop fort !
Avez-vous une préférence pour le pseudo ?. ( 24 avril ou imprescriptible ? )
c’est grace à votre lien sur F2 … dois-je vous remercier ?
y’a pas de raisons, moi aussi , je poste des liens .
An Anthology Of Historical Writings On The Armenians Massacres Of 1915
J’ai toujours eu une préférence pour 24avril1915, ce doit être ma formation d’historien qui me fait apprécier instinctivement les dates, même manipulées.Je n’ai aucun mérite, votre style est aussi reconnaissable que… le mien.Si vous voulez me remercier, je vous prie, ne vous gênez surtout pas. Si vous voulez m’envoyer des fleurs, en prime, dites-le. Sans explosifs, par contre, les fleurs, parce que ça gâche les bouquets, à mon avis.
Je suggère nous arrêter là, parce que notre aubergiste (Michael van der Galiën) risque de ne pas apprécier ce dialogue franco-français.
Armenian Atrocities and Terrorism:
http://www.karabakh-doc.azerall.info/ru/armyanstvo/arm12eng.htm
This issue has nothing to do with the age of Michael van der Galien, nor with the name change of this blog, nor with his love for Turkey. Furthermore, efforts to expose the Lies of Armenian Propagandists do not constitute “brainwashing”. Such comments only demonstrate desperation, immaturity, and weakness on the part of the accuser. They are often deleted and should be in my view as they constitute an abuse of this forum. As I understand, this forum is not for leveling childish insults at the author. If you have something to contribute here you are most welcome to do it and you are especially welcome if you feel that your argument disproves the author’s arguments. But individuals who just want to throw insults at the authors and/or moderators should be blocked in my view. Serious issues are being discussed here – issues that affect the lives of millions of people everyday around the world. We constantly see this behavior from Armenian Propagandists of ad-hominem attacks on their ideological opponents; it should not be tolerated, in my view.
My comment is in response to post #26 above from "Victor".
this act of political prostitution consist in dnying armenian genocide which constitute a shame on the notoriety of the organization(OCSE).Turkey try to manipulate public opinion or by paying high salary to so-called historians -lewis,mc charty or n.stone.Lost time-lost money.Evrybody nows that holocaust of the armenians has taken place during 1915 in Anatolia and Western Armenia situated now in turkey.The word holocaust has been used for the first time in the case of Armenia in 1896 by american newspapers such New York time and others during the massacres of Sasun’s Armenians under Abdul hamid reign- called (red sultan).Occupation and islamisation of Western Armenia resulted in 1915 genocide ( with cultural genocide) more than 3000 armenian churches destroyed by muslims turks or kurds which constitute crime against humanity.So that dishonest resolution has much more to do with geopolitical considerations of Turkey than with historical reality of Armenian genocide.In one case armenian-turkish commision can meet when turks recognize the genocide , financial compensation,and the return of Western Armenia "which is under turkish occupation" to armenian people.The turks live in a world of dream it’s hard to wake up of sweet dream when they will be obliged by Taner Akcam a turkish historian who teach armenian genocide in USA and canada it will be harder than now.
nemorono, the whole point is to have a dialogue between the peoples of Armenia and Turkey. That is why a joint research team to analyze and events of 1915 is essential. It needs to be taken away from the hands of the greedy politicians who are hungry for votes and given to the hands of honest and nonpartisan historians who will ones and for all clarify what exact took place. Whether you like it or not, there are great many questions that surround the events of 1915. For example, revolts by the Armenian nationalists, the involvement of the British and the Russians. The killings of the Muslim population. So just one sided view of "It was a genocide and except it" just does not wash with the world any more… The days of the "one sided view" of the events are over… One more point I would like to add: This idea that Turkey is pouring millions of dollars to buy writers and historians is actually a very weak and quite frankly not a very smart argument. If Turks are blamed for pouring money, the the Armenians should be held to the same scrutiny and be more open with where and how they funnel their money to fund the idea of "G". Let’s have a list of all the politicians who get funding from the diaspora in the US, France, Belgium, Switzerland etc etc…
Nota: AGBU is a branch of Ramkavar Party (conservative nationalists).
http://www15.dht.dk/~2westh/rigafm.html
François Rigaux Awarded AGBU Garbis Papazian Prize
Brussels, Feb. 13 (ANN/Groong) - The AGBU presented its 1999 Garbis Papazian prize to eminent jurist and scholar François Rigaux on Saturday, in a ceremony at the Brussels Conrad Hotel.
The Garbis Papazian prize, whose previous recipients include Baroness Caroline Cox, Dr. Tessa Hoffmann and Dr. Yves Ternon, is awarded yearly to individuals who have made a remarkable contribution to Armenian causes of all kinds. Prof. Rigaux, who teaches law at the Catholic University of Louvain-la-Neuve, presided over the Permanent People’s Tribunal when it recognised the Armenian Genocide as one of this century’s first major crimes against humanity, in April 1984. Composed of 13 prominent intellectuals, scientists and jurists (among whom several Nobel-prize recipients), the Tribunal condemned the Young Turkish government of 1915 for having masterminded the extermination of Turkey’s Armenian minority. It called upon the contemporary Republic of Turkey to assume full responsibility for the actions of its predecessor state.
Mr. Viguen Tchitechian, Armenia’s ambassador to Belgium, and Mr. Edouard Jakhian, member of the AGBU Central Board, thanked Prof. Rigaux on behalf of the Armenians, for his unrelenting dedication to historical justice. The prize was subsequently presented jointly by Mrs. Louise Manoogian-Simone, Chairwoman of the AGBU, and Mr. Garbis Papazian. Prof. Rigaux expressed his gratitude at having been awarded the prize, calling upon the Armenians to continue their quest for recognition as a major contribution to international equity. A congratulatory letter from His Holiness Karekin I, Catholicos of All Armenians, was finally read by His Eminence Archbishop Kud Nakashian of Paris.
"If you fail now and then, that is the price for progress. For example, it was I who brought Taner Akcam to America as well as Hilmar Kaiser. The first was certainly good, and we do not know yet about the second case."
Dennis Papazian (http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/akcam-hosted.htm).
"Kéchichian’s claim that ASAM’s ‘mission includes propagandistic and partisan research and publication’ is an apt description of the Armenian Zoryan Institute that has published some of Taner Akçam’s work."
Michael M. Gunter, professor at Tennessee University (http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/41948.html).
The Zoryan Institute, who works Mr. Dadrian (since his forced retirement of NY State University, because of a sexual harassment scandal), is entirely financed by Armenian businessmen, and is close to the Armenian National Committee of America, i. e., the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, the Dashnak Party. The ARF is described by the Armenian-French political scientist Gaïdz Minassian (a former supporter of the dashnaks), as a terrorist party, with strongly totalitarian tendencies : Guerre et terrorisme arméniens, Paris, PUF, 2002.
Every years, the Armenian Assembly of America and the ANCA pay millions dollars to republican both democrats, especially in California. Every years, the ANCA harass and threat everyone who critize the dashnak point of view. Every years, the Comité de coordination des associations arméniennes de France, and the Parisian Comité de défense de la cause arménienne have an electoral blackmail on French politicians in Marseille, Lyon’s suburb and in Parisian agglomeration (especially Issy-les-Moulineaux, Villeurbanne and Décines-Charpieu). As the senators are not elected, in France, by the citizens, but by local ediles, the French dashnaks harassed and almost physically threatened the senators, in 1999-2000, to get a favorable vote to "recognition law".
The Turkish claims for massacres committed by the Armenian rebillions is only mentioned in the Ottoman archives to justify the war crimes committed by the Turks during WWI. Most of biased readers here think that the killing of the Armenians started in 1915 after the Armenians decided to join the Russians during the war. Wrong! the reality is that the killing of the Armenians and other ethnic Christians started decades before that during the era of Sulatn Abdul Hamid. For all the Turks writing on this page, you should not defend the crimes that your grandfathers did 100 years ago. But, read the history rationally just like the Germans read their modern history without sympathy to Hitler. If the Turks want to be part of Europe, they should bravely face their past and reconcile with their own nation (Kurds and others) and neighbours. The Ottoman mentality does not help the Turks to gain respect.
Let historians decide? Ok, so which historians should be consulted?How about the foremost experts in genocide in the world? Say the historians member of the International Association of Genocide Scholars. Is that good enough?
Well, it turns out they have an opinion on the issue and they shared their view with then Turkish PM Erdogan on June 13 , 2005 . In their open letter to Erdogan they state:
" Dear Prime Minister Erdogan: We are writing you this open letter in response to your call for an “impartial study by historians” concerning the fate of the Armenian people in the Ottoman Empire during World War I.
We represent the major body of scholars who study genocide in North America and Europe. We are concerned that in calling for an impartial study of the Armenian Genocide you may not be fully aware of the extent of the scholarly and intellectual record on the Armenian Genocide and how this event conforms to the definition of the United Nations Genocide Convention. We want to underscore that it is not just Armenians who are affirming the Armenian Genocide but it is the overwhelming opinion of scholars who study genocide: hundreds of independent scholars, who have no affiliations with governments, and whose work spans many countries and nationalities and the course of decades. The scholarly evidence reveals the following: (…)" They establish the facts of what happened starting 1915 and affirm " The Armenian Genocide is corroborated by the international scholarly, legal, and human rights community"
They continue:
" We note that there may be differing interpretations of genocide—how and why the Armenian Genocide happened, but to deny its factual and moral reality as genocide is not to engage in scholarship but in propaganda and efforts to absolve the perpetrator, blame the victims, and erase the ethical meaning of this history. "
Any questions?
Full letter here:
http://www.genocidewatch.org/TurkishPMIAGSOpenLetterreArmenia6-13-05.htm
Bigger the LIE and more often been said you belive it, Armenians are a Big liars,since they are christians sorth of speak west chose to go with it
IT IS THE BIGGEST LIE OF OUR MODERN HISTORY,There was NO so Called Genocide thats why Armenians would not open their books,there is no trial without evidence ,and get over it and stop making cliams to Turkish land,it would be disester for Armenians,and just 15 years ago Armenians Massacered 1000’s of Azeri people,it was condem by United Nations,just 15 years ago,Armenians are good of masscering women and children who are defensless ,which they done to Turks in 1914
You will find in the PDF document describing the horrors committed in Aleppo:
Dr Martin Niepage - The Horrors of aleppo - 1975
the first pdf file is in English , the second file is in French.
I Agree with Alexander and Matthew and whole hardedly with Lucrece.
There was killing and first Armenians strated the killing women and children while their dads and uncles were in the front fighting the war with British-Greeks_French and Italians
there were no strong man to protect the Turks from this Armenian murderers,terrorists who burned muslim people in their Musques,
Armenians formed their unity by hating the Turks,it is the only thing unites them,passing this hatred to their young kids,what a shame for a such a great people with good history of art and sience
they are making their kids hate reather than love
shame on them,I been in Turkey and l studied their history they are no worse than any other including, ours, here in USA
You know us Americans are tired of hearing this Armenian issue,more than 90 years ago,and we are tired of seen them in the street of Los Angeles every april 24 th,shouting hatred using foul language ,
Look at what is hapining right now,we should put more on that.
I am sorry but armenians should get over it and go on,
and no I disagree with Obama is going to pass it,
Turkey was a good friend of USA while Armenia pendering to Russians and Iranians.
I highly dought that ,American president who will be informed by the Military how important to keep Turks in our side,not 1 million lobbyiest here in Los Angeles and 3 million Armenians in Armenia
will make that decition.
even in France Upper parlement did not approve the passing of this,
and if Armenians thinks they are going to gain a land inside of Turkey,they are dreaming and thye should wake up,
do you know the size of the Turkish military mit is second in NATO only to USA,and not the mention Azeries and Turkmenistan and other Turkish speaking people in former Russia.
you have to kill every living Turk to gain inch of their land,I am not Turkish but l met few and read about their history,they say they stop giving land in 1923 and from now on it will be over their dead bodies,
and the geopolitical land scape they have,no western power will go alone to create any problems in the area,
and be realist and work with Turks,their economy is booming it will help Poor Armenia,
Las Vegas casino owner Kirk Kirkorians money can not do it alone
work for peace and let us live in peace in Hollywood
Thank you
The Turkish claims for massacres committed by the Armenian rebillions is only mentioned in the Ottoman archives to justify the war crimes committed by the Turks during WWI.
1) Assert that Ottoman documents were written for jusitfy crimes is a logical aberration.
2) Many Russian and Western sources corroborate a part of the Ottoman sources. Turcs et Arméniens devant l’histoire and Documents relatifs aux atrocités commises par les Arméniens sur la population musulmane include Russian documents. Turkish historian Azmi Süslü has compiled and translated many Russian documents: Russian View on the Armenian Atrocities Against the Turks, Ankara, 1991. I have indicated the link for the Niles-Sutherland report. A quotation of this important source:
"In the entire region from Bitlis through Van to Bayezit, we were informed that the damage and destruction had been done by the Armenians, who, after the Russians retired, remained in occupation of the country and who, when the Turkish army advanced, destroyed everything belonging to the Musulmans. Moreover, the Armenians are accused of having committed murder, rape, arson and horrible atrocities of every description upon the Musulman population. At first, we were most incredulous of these stories, but we finally came to believe them, since the testimony was absolutely unanimous and was corroborated by material evidence. For instance, the only quarters left at all intact in the cities of Bitlis and Van are Armenian quarters… while the Musulman quarters were completely destroyed."
The reports of American major James G. Harbord and of the British major E. W. C. Nobel (quoted in Guenter Lewy’s book, pp. 118-119) conclude that the was no particular differences between the Muslims atrocities against Armenians and the Armenian atrocities against Muslims. Harold Armstron, British military attaché in Istanbul has the same conclusion in his book Turkey in Travail: The Birth of a Nation, London, John Lane/Bodlay Head, 1925, p. 223.
Wrong! the reality is that the killing of the Armenians and other ethnic Christians started decades before that during the era of Sulatn Abdul Hamid.
The Armenian rebellions, terrorist acts and other crimes began in 1862, with the Zeytun rebellion, as explain very good the Armenian-American historian Louise Nalbandian (RIP) in The Armenian Revolutionary Movement, Berkeley/Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1963. Ms. Nalbandian clarifies that this violent acts are not just "self-defense", but, at least for a part, agressive acts and provocations.
Say the historians member of the International Association of Genocide Scholars. Is that good enough?
No. The IAGS has no autority for say about this subject.
"I am less than impressed by the unanimous vote of the International Association of Genocide Scholars that the Armenian case ‘was one of the major genocides of the modern era.’ The great majority of these self-proclaimed experts on Ottoman history have never set foot in an archive or done any other original research on the subject in question. [...]
Distinguished scholars of Ottoman history like Roderic Davison, J.C. Hurewitz, Bernard Lewis, and Andrew Mango have rejected the appropriateness of the genocide label for those occurrences. Yet, ignoring this formidable array of learned opinion, Armenians and their supporters among so-called genocide scholars continue to assert with superb arrogance that the Armenian genocide is incontrovertible fact and ‘established history’ that can be denied only by lackeys of the Turkish government or morally obtuse individuals. Unless and until there is a change in this attitude, I see little hope for ending this almost century-old conflict."
Guenter Lewy, professor emeritus at Massachussetts University: https://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/genocide–11140?page=all
The Armenians claim that the ‘international scholars of genocide’ support the Armenian thesis, so whoever disagrees with ‘the occurrence of a so-called Armenian genocide’ is unreliable and is definitely hired by the Turkish government. I think, only the following two examples are enough to display the scientific and ethical reliability of the ‘independent’ scholars who support the Armenians in their various thesis: The cover photograph of the book of Tessa Hoffmann: The Greek German scholar Tessa Hoffmann who supports the Armenian thesis printed the painting of Russian artist Vasili Vereshchagin entitled ‘The Apotheosis of the Franco-Prussia War of 1871, depicting a mass of skulls which is displayed in Russian Painting Gallery, as if it were the photograph of 1915 Armenian genocide, in the cover of a pamphlet used to introduce a conference entitled ‘Der Volkermord and den Armenien vor Gericht (The Armenian Genocide on Trial). Tessa Hoffman had to admit her forgery during the trial of Doğu Perinçek held in Switzerland in March 2007, in which he was listened as a wittness. Atatürk’s photograph: The large poster with ‘FACE OF DENIAL-DOES NOT LIE’ related to a conference given by Dr Vahram Shemmasian, Ardashes Kassakhian and Dr Levon Marashlian, at UCLA on April 14, 2005, organized by Armenian Genocide Commemoration Committee of Alpha Epsilon Omega, (http://www.genocideevents.com/cities/losangeles.html) was just a scandal:The photo depicted the founder of the Turkish Republic, Ataturk, sitting on a chair outside a house with the corpse of a young girl with her innards exposed to the elements. Soon, the original of this photo was found by the Turks: It was a photograph of Ataturk for his wife Latife Hanım as a souvenir, posing with some ‘cute dog puppies’ at his feet. Two photos were printed in the July 1, 2005 issue of Hurriyet (http://webarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/2005/07/01/665930.asp), as ‘a forgery scandal’. It is another outstanding point that no dissenting comment was ever heard. What UCLA’s ethical committee did was to erase the handwritten note and doctor a photo of Armin Wengler in place of the puppies. This degree of base falsification and slandering must have suited the present status of UCLA, an institution of higher learning dominated by Armenophile scholars, and where Prof Stanford Shaw’s home was bombed in 1977, just because he did not support the Armenian thesis.
Mustafa ka, thank you very much for your insightful and very well thought out exposé! You have literally summed up my thoughts and feelings… Armenian diaspora has taken over most important media outlets and groups pushing very well their deceitful lies and historical distortions. That is EXACTLY what the Turks need to tackle! The distortions, lies, false pictures, manipulation of the public sympathy and total support of certain interest groups are the core of the problem.
Even those who ( historans) are being paid by Turkish governement admits the reality of genocide.In the case of dr Donald Quartet who has been obliged to resign from the chair of turkish studies in 2006 in USA.He was the honorary president of the institute of turkish studies financed by Turkish governement. After 15 years of study he arrived at the conclusion that massacres of armenians constitute a genocide case.This honnest position of Dr Quartet provoked the anger of denylist turkish state which forced Dr Quartet to resign.The new generation of turkish historians such Taner Akcam Fatma Gocek or Halil Berktay who recognize Armenian genocide are well placed to teach to their compatriots the historical truth and to help them to face the reality.Armenian-turkish joint commision could only define financial and terittorial loses of armenian people.
Even those who ( historans) are being paid by Turkish governement admits the reality of genocide.
Paul Dumont, Gwynne Dyer, Edward J. Erickson, Michael M. Gunter, Eberhard Jäckel, Bernard Lewis, Guenter Lewy, Justin McCarthy, Andrew Mango, Jeremy Salt, Norman Stone, Malcolm E. Yapp, Gilles Veinstein or Robert Zeidner are not "paid by the Turkish government", but reject the Armenian lies.
After 15 years of study he arrived at the conclusion that massacres of armenians constitute a genocide case.
Mr. Quataert has never produce one study about the Armenian affair, he repeat perrot fashion the Armenian propaganda and that is all. Mr. Quataert has never quoted the studies of Dr. Stoddard, Prof. Lewy and Dr. Erickson about the Special Organization. Do he know only that this studies exist?
He praise the book of Mr. Bloxham, but not say that Mr. Bloxham
1) finds excuses the atrocities of the Armenian Legion in Cilicia, and the murders of Turkish diplomats between 1973 and 1984;
2) can not decide on to present the Armenians whether as the "oppressed victims" wailing under the "oppression" of the Ottoman state or as the "revolutionary heroes" who "uccessfully" (ah ah ah) struggles against the Ottoman state.
http://www.eraren.org/index.php?Lisan=en&Page=DergiIcerik&IcerikNo=476
Praise such a book, without mentioning the contradictions and the fallcies, is unworthy of a real scholar. The place of Mr. Quataert is retirement.
l:The photo depicted the founder of the Turkish Republic, Ataturk, sitting on a chair outside a house with the corpse of a young girl with her innards exposed to the elements.
Um, the diasporan Armenians juxtaposed those images to show the modern day Turkish indifference to the subject of the Armenian Genocide; I’m rather dumbfounded why you Turks would actually think that photo meant that Ataturk was somehow involved in the massacres of 1915 when everyone knows he was still commanding troops in the Dardanelles.
Talk about a non-victory, you guys actually bothered to "unmask" a poster that clearly had billed itself as a work of a Photoshop? - lol, I can now see why Turks are so afraid of the Armenian Diaspora.
During a recent meeting with the Armenian community of Moscow President Sargsyan said, “Turkey proposes to form a commission to study historical facts. We do not mind it but the land border between our countries should be opened first. Otherwise, the commission may become a tool of abuse and protraction of the issue for many years.”
Kocharyan had said no to earlier Turkish attempts to open archives due to the fact that if they open archives than it would be as if Armenia was doubting the genocide. Why study something everyone knows took place.
About getting land back. Vardan Oskanyan, Armenias ex-foreign minister, had told Turkish officials, "we will stick to the borders drawn up during the treaty of kars."
those who are taking part to that discussion are mainly denylist sites guided by turkish state.So we can ask some questions about the existence of such newspaper which so-called keep balance between denyers and historical truth.By doing that it spreads misinformation about the historical truth of Genocide.Under the disguise of "opinions"if it does not promote policy of negation of Turkish state.
Now I want to ask Armenia and Armenian diaspora: ‘If all the scholars of the world, including the international scholars of genocide, support your thesis of genocide,and if you are very disturbed because of vehement reject of your genocide thesis by the Turkish government and the Turks, then: Why do you vehemently reject to bring your evidences in historical commissions made up of Armenian and Turkish historians in addition to historians from third countries, as it was suggested to Armenia by the Turkish prime minister in 2005?Why do you not go to court? Why HAVE YOU SPENT EFFORT TO FALSIFY ALL THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS? WHY HAVE YOU NEEDED LIES? Here are a few examples of the forgeries and falfified documents on which the Armenian thesis depend: 1)The number of Armenians who were relocated: The number of the Armenians who were relocated was reported as 600-700 thousand by Boğos Nubar Pasha who attended to the talks of Sevres Treaty as a chief of Armenians; however the number of relocated Armenians is given as 1.5 million by some Armenian sources and 2 and even 2.5 million by some others. However, the total number of Ottoman Armenians including those who live in the West Anatolia (therefore who were not relocated) was reported as 1.5 million in Encyclopedia Britannica’s 1910 edition which was edited by an English editor. It is another striking point that the total number of Ottoman Armenians was increased to 2.5 million in 1953 edition of the same encyclopedia which was edited by an Armenian editor. 2) Aram Andonian’s book (The telegrams which were claimed to have been sent by Talat Pasha to order the massacre of the Armenians which were pressed in the book of Aram Andonian in 1920, in three languages): It was proven by both the Turkish and foreign historians that these telegrams were fake too.After these telegrams were published in Daily Telegraph in England, in 1922, the English Foreign Ministry made a scrutiny and denounced that they were prepared by an Armenian association. 3)Diary of American Ambassador Morgenthau published in 1918. Professor Heath Lowry, an American historian from Princeton University displayed that the events depicted in the book depended on lies or half true events, by comparing the information Ambassador Morgenthau sent to American Foreign Ministry, with those written in the diary, in his book entitled ‘The Story Behind Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story’, in 1990. What’s more, after the Ottoman State was defeated in the 1st World War in 1918, the French and English invaders arrested 144 high level Ottoman veteran or civil officials including the ex-prime ministers, ex-deputies, governors and many newspapermen, and banished them to Malta Island, claiming that they were responsibles for the death of Armenians. The English seized all the Ottoman Archives and also all other archives in other cities, like those in Urfa Governer House. No evidence could be found neither in the Ottoman and English Archives. The Americans, whom the English applied, failed to find any proof in American Archives and reports of American Orthodox church or missioners either. Nor could Damat Ferit Pasha, then the Ottoman Prime Minister who was in absolute collaboration with the English could find any evidence. And, they had to make all these 144 Ottomans free in 1921, since they could not find any proof to be able to verdict them. Can you imagine a genocide planned by a government but no kind of proof can be found, even when the members of this government have been taken prisoners and when all her archieves are under control of the invaders and under the directory of an Armenian official? If The Blue Book, the telegrams of Aram Andonian and the diary of Ambassador Morgenthau (which had already been published at that time) were reliable proofs, why did the English and French invaders and the Americans not accept them to give verdicts of those 144 Ottoman officials? Additionally, during the trial in Berlin of the Armenian assassin Soghomon Tehlirian, who had murdered Talat Pasha in Berlin on March 15th, 1921, none of the Andonian documents was allowed to be entered into the court proceedings as evidence (Dashnakists’ book Justicier du Genocide, 1981, p.213). 4)The cover photograph of the book of Tessa Hoffmann: see comment 50
5)Atatürk’s photograph: see comment 50
………………
Now I want to ask Armenia and Armenian diaspora: ‘If all the scholars of the world, including the international scholars of genocide, support your thesis of genocide,and if you are very disturbed because of vehement reject of your genocide thesis by the Turkish government and the Turks, then: Why do you vehemently reject to bring your evidences in historical commissions made up of Armenian and Turkish historians in addition to historians from third countries, as it was suggested to Armenia by the Turkish prime minister in 2005?Why do you not go to court? Why HAVE YOU SPENT EFFORT TO FALSIFY ALL THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS? WHY HAVE YOU NEEDED LIES? Here are a few examples of the forgeries and falfified documents on which the Armenian thesis depend: 1)The number of Armenians who were relocated: The number of the Armenians who were relocated was reported as 600-700 thousand by Boğos Nubar Pasha who attended to the talks of Sevres Treaty as a chief of Armenians; however the number of relocated Armenians is giv