Lock These Parents Up

June 9th, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

And throw away the key. ‘A 12-YEAR-OLD girl in Scotland brought up by her parents on a strict vegan diet has been admitted to hospital with a degenerative bone condition said to have left her with the spine of an 80-year-old woman.’

Doctors are under pressure to report the couple to police and social workers amid concerns that her health and welfare may have been neglected in pursuit of their dietary beliefs.

The girl, who has been fed on a strict meat and dairy-free diet from birth, is said to have a severe form of rickets and to have suffered a number of fractured bones.

The condition is caused by a lack of vitamin D, which is needed to absorb calcium and is found in liver, oily fish and dairy produce. Decalcification leads to the bones becoming brittle and can cause curvature of the spine.

Dr Faisal Ahmed, the consultant paediatrician treating the child at the Royal Hospital for Sick Children in Glasgow, declined to discuss the specific case. He said, however, that he believed the dangers of forcing children to follow a strict vegan diet needed to be highlighted.

One leading nutritionist, who asked not to be named, said: “In most instances, the parents who are imposing this very restrictive and potentially hazardous diet are not themselves brought up as vegans. They are imposing on their children something . . . which we do not know enough about to know it is safe.”

Don Surber summarizes it quite well:  “Parents love animals so much that they nearly kill their daughter.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Claudia, Assistant Editor
    June 9th, 2008 at 16:13
    Reply | Quote | #1

    There are several things that make this case especially bad. First of all, school officials. If she was so malnourished that it came to this, shouldn’t have some responsible adult noticed sooner? The report said she’d had several fractures due to weak bones before, they must have noticed she wasn’t well.

    Even more terrible is the case they mention in passing:

    In 2001 two vegans from west London were sentenced to three years’ community rehabilitation after they admitted starving their baby to death.

    Three years community service for starving your baby to DEATH?!!!!! Unless both parents can be shown to be mentally retarded that sentence is simply obcene. Your baby is a person, not a toy you can make or break.

    Personally I can accept veganism as a lifestyle, even if there’s nothing "natural" about it.  In fact, I can even accept having your children follow that lifestyle but ONLY and this is essential, if you can show that there is NO HARM committed upon their health. Your ethical viewpoint does NOT trump the health of your child. The problem isn’t as much that these parents are vegans as they are fundamentalist freaks (other less polite words come to mind). Any responsible parent wanting to raise a child while having dietary rules goes to the doctor and to a child nutritionist and makes absolutely sure that the rules don’t harm the child.

  2. Michael Merritt
    June 10th, 2008 at 00:41
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Obviously the parents should be locked up for abuse to their child.  However, I hope this case isn’t blown out of proportion (like many things are in the media) and make vegans feel like outcasts.  I’m not a vegan myself, and don’t know any strict vegans (I have two vegetarian friends), but I do think that with proper planning, veganism could probably work for any child.  I’m not a nutritionist though, so I’m not sure.

    Still, it’s clear that in this case that proper planning probably wasn’t used.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500