Glowing Reviews to Clinton’s Concession Speech

June 8th, 2008 By: Claudia, Assistant Editor | Tags: , , ,

Hillary Clinton’s speech yesterday has gained her wall-to-wall positive press accross traditional and web-based media, all of it deserved.

There was a certain degree of uncertainty before Clinton gave her concession speech yesterday. Past experience had taught everyone, even the pundits, to be wary of predicting what Clinton would say. She was supposed to concede graciously and endorse Barack Obama, but the general agreement was “I’ll believe it when I see it”.

Well they’re believing it now, as Clinton met and surpassed all the expectations of her speech and garnered positively glowing praise across the media and blogosphere.

The Washington Post noted that Clinton gave a “full-throated endorsement” and never allowed even the slightest bit of ambiguity into her backing of Obama. No one could look at her speech and ever say she wasn’t making herself clear.

The LA Times follows suit, saying that Clinton “solidly” backed Obama and noting that the speech was “emotional” and “unequivocal”.

Other media used words to the same effect: unwavering, determined, “throwing herself behind”, backing, supporting, endorsing, joining. Also inspirational, emotional, gracious, elegant, poignant, historic and groundbreaking. Lots of thesauruses have been well thumbed these past 24 hours.

The (pro-democratic) blogosphere has been even more enthusiastic. Areas of the net that have for months lacked much positivity about both candidates, instead opting for their favorite, are positively overflowing with cuddly niceness and unity now. Comments from Far Left Field thanks Senator Clinton for her speech with the headline “The day has Come“. Andrew Sullivan leads with a flattering picture of Clinton under the headline “Yes She Did“. TPM does a short technical commentary praising the construction of the speech itself.

Obam, who has for weeks been praising Clinton on his stump speech, was obviously very pleased with the speech, saying:

“I am thrilled and honored to have Sen. Clinton’s support,” Obama said. “But more than that, I honor her today for the valiant and historic campaign she has run. She shattered barriers on behalf of my daughters and women everywhere, who now know that there are no limits to their dreams.”

The Obama campaign website has a banner on the front page at present saying “Thank You Senator Clinton” and that links you to a place where you can write a message of gratitude to Clinton.

I watched the speech, available below, and liked it. I was actually more worried about the crowd than the senator. Even if I didn’t support her, I know she’s a professional, and once it was clear she wasn’t going to be ambiguous, I relaxed. The crowd was another matter, it wasn’t clear she’d be able to convince them that she was sincere and that if they trusted her they needed to trust her enough to work for Obama. Her first endorsement of him was met with cheers AND boos (though I commend the cheering supporters for doing their best to drown out the boos) but she soldiered on until they were only cheering. She made clear that she wasn’t going to change her mind because of some booing, and generally did a good job of bringing the crowd with her, some more willingly than others.

Here’s the full speech:

YouTube Preview Image

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Interested
    June 9th, 2008 at 03:08
    Reply | Quote | #2

    well she did something right finally.  Now we will see if she goes on to heal the party she helped fracture.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500