Syria and Lebanon; a Tale of an Abusive Relationship

Filed under: Lebanon, Middle East, Syria — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on June 7, 2008 @ 6:00 pm CEST

‘Damascus and Beirut are heading toward normalization and full diplomatic relations for the first time in their modern history, which the Lebanese expect will usher in a relationship based on mutual respect for each other’s sovereignty and the Syrians hope will improve their ties with the rest of the world,’ the ME Times reports.

Damascus is said to be waiting for the Lebanese to form a new unity government before normalizing relations by opening embassies and exchanging ambassadors.

Syrian President Bashar Assad made a point of speaking to journalists during his visit to the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait this week, telling them that he was ready to open an embassy in the Lebanese capital once a unity government is formed in Beirut.

“Obviously, if there is a unity government that represents all the Lebanese parties, then our ties with it will be good,” Assad told Kuwaiti newspapers Thursday. “When these circumstances are in place, we will hopefully soon exchange embassies with Lebanon.”

Prime Minister designate Fouad Siniora has been in the process of forming a new cabinet since the Lebanese rivals reached an accord in Doha last month, ending an 18-month explosive crisis between the pro-Western ruling coalition and the Hezbollah-led opposition that had paralyzed the country and occasionally threatened to erupt into civil strife.

The Qatari-brokered deal had called for a unity government that gave the Syrian-backed opposition veto power and led to the election of President Michel Suleiman, the former army chief, finally filling a seat that had been vacant since pro-Syrian Emile Lahoud’s term expired in November.

Assad said his country had raised the issue of establishing diplomatic ties in 2005 “in light of new circumstances … but it was not appropriate to open an embassy at a time when relations with Lebanon were not good.”

This is hilarious. It’s like an abusive husband beating up his wife until she’s hospitalized, after which he says: “OK honey, now we can have a good and fruitful relationship.”

Friend’s Note
In the adventure vacations guide, there are a number of travel deals including both these destinations. There are many flights as well as cheap hotels to choose from. However, there are no cruises as such.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

2 Comments »

  1. 1 lwestin

    June 8, 2008 @ 3:52 am CEST

    exactly.

  2. 2 Albert Samtu

    June 8, 2008 @ 4:32 pm CEST

    Exactly NOT..The analogy about the abusive husband or wife have nothing to do with Internatinal Diplomatic Protocol. The absence of an embassy is not synonymous with absence of respect to sovereignty. Syria was invited to intervene on behalf of right wing Christians, by the then government of Lebanon, with U.N. and A.L. blessing. Why is it that Lebanon and Israel don’t exchange Embassies. Israel abused (and still does) Lebanese sovereignty for 22 years. They still violate Lebanon’s airspace and territorial waters at will, and still occupy the Shebaa farms.

    Assuming that Hizballah is an extension of he Syrian presence, they are the party that prevented another civil war. They could have easily eradicated the government of Saniora, who was doing the bidding for Israeli/American plans for hegemony in the Region. They did not. And that is good enough proof that Syria and Hizballah are not abusive of Lebanon’s sovereignty. They are Lebanon’s protection from the sharks that are waiting for the opportunity to turn it into a base for Imperialist projects in the Middle East.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim) or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • AlexP1: …So, 40 year old history is now news….The Vietnam War as a travesty in this nation back then, so...
  • David: Thanks Michael.  I read your site nearly every day, but I don’t always have time to comment.
  • Jay_C: I’m still holding on to hope, but I’d like to see things getting better, not worse.
  • Michael: Wow… the bailout worked as expected… Like pouring gasoline on a fire… Let me guess…...
  • redfish: Michael, I’ve made my first YouTube video and I’m passing it around :...

Partners

 

Your Ad Here