Hillary Making VP Overtures?

Filed under: 2008 elections, Barack Obama, Democratic party, Democrats, Hillary Clinton — Claudia, Assistant Editor on June 4, 2008 @ 12:03 am CEST

The AP is reporting that Hillary Clinton has said she is “open” to a VP slot. Now, the AP already got slammed once today by the Clinton campaign for reporting that Clinton was ready to concede should Obama, so I urge caution in this case as well, even though it’s a very credible news organization, it could be getting sloppy in the rush of the last day.

But mindless speculation is fun!

Is Hillary asking for the job ?

Is she simply trying to get asked? Does she want to be given the respectful gesture but will turn it down in the end? After all, she did get within a hairsbreadth away from winning (yes, I’m an Obama supporter and I recognize that he only just won, it could easily have been reversed).

Perhaps she’d rather put him in a position where not asking her will make him look bad, with that being her actual goal? In this scenario, she knows he won’t ask (in case she says yes) and wants to continue to make her “I’m the victim and you who supported me are disenfranchised” case. You might be shocked to know I don’t actually think this is the correct option. Clinton is a practical lady, and this would not advance her career in any way.

I’ve come to peace with the matter. I’ll admit, the first time I thought she might have to be on the ticket, I shuddered. I’ve had quite enough of her, frankly. But as time has gone by I realized I’d much rather have her on the ticket and have Obama in the White House. If she can help him win, then she should be on the ticket. I happen to think he’s not a pushover and won’t let her OR Bill dominate his White House. Besides VPs have traditionally had attack dog roles in campaigns, and she’d make a fantastic attack dog.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

4 Comments »

  1. 1 Interested

    June 3, 2008 @ 11:59 pm CEST

    Obama’s biggest nightmare - she accepts.

  2. 2 wj

    June 4, 2008 @ 1:38 am CEST

    Interested, exactly the reason why he should never even consider making an overture of that kind.  Or even something that could be spun as an offer. 

    Bad enough that she might call a press conference to thank him for offering and accept…when he had done no such thing.  The Obama campaign would be well advised to start thinking now (if they ahven’t already) about how they would deal with that if it happened.

  3. 3 The Moderate Voice

    June 4, 2008 @ 4:43 pm CEST

    Short-Circuiting Clinton? Pelosi, Reid, Dean Give Superdelegates Friday Decision Deadline…

    Have three of the Democratic party’s top leaders named Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Howard Dean decided they’ve had enough and want to make sure that with Democratic Senator Barack Obama now the Democrats’ presumptive Presidential nom…

  4. 4 Michael van der Galien

    June 4, 2008 @ 6:05 pm CEST

    Claudia: I agree with your assessment on whether or not Obama is a pushover (he’s not), and that Clinton would be a good attack dog.

    And yes, Obama needs her support. Bigtime.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • David: Would somebody please delete the double post?
  • David: I think that her biggest plus is the fact that her Alaska administration has a reputation for successful...
  • David: I think that her biggest plus is the fact that her Alaska administration has a reputation for successful...
  • Kevin H: I’m comming in to this late. But I’ll start off with inexperience. I think that your right...
  • Mikeh: "To me the idea that someone could have their finger on the button that would give credence to the most...

Partners