The Other Polygamy

June 3rd, 2008 By: Deafening Silence | Tags:

An great interview with Anne Wilde, leader of a polygamy advocacy group.

Anne Wilde is a co-founder of Principle Voices, a leading polygamy advocacy group, and a member of the Utah Attorney General’s Safety Net Committee, an outreach organization created to work with polygamist families. She is also co-author (with Mary Batchelor and Marianne Watson) of Voices in Harmony: Contemporary Women Celebrate Plural Marriage.

We spoke by phone.

Anne Wilde was a plural wife for 33 years, until the death of her husband.

She doesn’t wear a prairie dress. She doesn’t live in an isolated compound. She holds a B.A. in Business Education and is a published author.

And she wants you to know she is not unusual.

Polygamy in the United States, she says, is far more diverse than just a few isolated communities.

“There’s no recipe for how to live this,” she says.

In addition to organized religious communities, there are up to 15,000 independent Fundamentalist Mormon families practicing plural marriage on their own. The Principle Voices website also carries links to Christian and other non-Mormon groups practicing polygamy.

“There are a lot of people who live [polygamy] for other reasons in the United States. Muslims and Jews who live it as a Biblical principle or may just live it because it’s convenient- there’s all different reasons.”

Ms. Wilde and her co-authors decided to write Voices in Harmony in part to counter negative media coverage of plural marriage.

“If we don’t speak up and show the other side of the picture then they’re going to keep talking for us and everybody’s going to think it’s just a terrible lifestyle.”

As part of the research for Voices in Harmony the authors sent surveys to Mormon plural wives. The results showed that the average plural marriage has 2-3 wives and 7-10 children. The typical plural wife is educated. She may share a single residence with the rest of the family or have a home of her own. Many polygamous families live quietly alongside their monogamous neighbors.

“…there are many, many women who have freely chosen this lifestyle as consenting adults and that are happy and adjusted in it,” she says.

A plural wife is often a working mother. The large families produced by plural marriage can be difficult for one man to support; Ms. Wilde worked and said she was glad to contribute to her family’s income.

“A lot of wives feel the same way,” she says. “They are highly educated in many cases and they want to use that education in helping the family.”

There are risks, however. Polygamy in illegal in all 50 states and is a felony in

Utah.

“It lends to isolation because people don’t want to take the risk of coming out in public or being found out. The kids in public school can be ridiculed; that’s why they try to keep that kind of quiet.”

A reluctance to come forward can mask problems such as poverty or domestic abuse. That is where Principle Voices and the Safety Net Committee try to step in and help.

“We have also tried to help our own people in understanding these [state] agencies are there to help provide services for everybody across the board that qualifies, whether you’re a polygamist or not. And some of the poeple that live in this lifestyle are so isolated and so leery of the government…that they are in poverty where they really do qualify for these services.”

Her group gives presentations to polygamist communities on domestic violence. Polygamist groups need to understand, says Ms. Wilde, that domestic abuse is more than broken bones:

“…there’s other kinds of domestic violence and abuse. Emotional abuse. Mental and so forth…”

“Controlling and domineering husbands are not what our lifestyles are all about.”

Ms. Wilde says that she and her colleagues have worked with many groups, but efforts to reach out to Warren Jeff’s FLDS have been unsuccessful.

“We have offered and we’ve even sent money to help the women and children. And care packages and 500 letters from some of the polygamous children up here, as well as plural wives, to open up communications. So we have made an effort to try and help them understand that we’re very supportive of them as family- as long as there’s no red flags- which we don’t support.”

“But we have to make that distinction so they don’t think we’re supporting underage marriages or any kind of abuse- and I don’t think those situations exist in FLDS as much as people think they do.”

Ms. Wilde believes that polygamy should be decriminalized but not legalized. Reducing polygamy to a misdemeanor could help open up communities and encourage those in need of help to come forward.

“All in all, decriminalizing would remove a lot of that stigma and risk, because they couldn’t be charged with any kind of crime,” she says.

Most plural families have only one legal wife. Subsequent unions are “spiritual marriages” and have no official legal status. I ask Ms. Wilde how she would protect that rights of spiritual wives.

“This whole lifestyle is based on religious principles and if a family cannot provide and make sure all the wives are taken care of then they have no business being in this lifestyle. There shouldn’t have to be a law saying ‘OK, something happened, then the law says you get such-and-such.’ ”

She cites examples of polygamous families who have used wills and other notarized documents to organize their assets and childrearing responsibilities.

“I just know so many- really thousands- of women that have chosen this as consenting adults, it works for them, it’s a strongly held religious belief and it doesn’t mean there aren’t adjustments and challenges- just like in a monogamous family- but it’s worth working it out because they have this belief that you will be blessed for doing so.”

I ask her if she can envision a society where plural marriage and monogamy peacefully coexist.

There is a long pause. A little sigh.

“Oh,’ she says, “that would be a utopia for us.”

Cross-posted at Deafening Silence.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Robert
    June 3rd, 2008 at 19:02
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Just to clarify- while some polygamists may call themselves "Mormon" they will also tell you that they have no ties with the official Mormon church or the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.  Any member of the Mormon church that practices polygamy is excommunicated.  That has been the case for over 100 years.

  2. Loverboy
    June 3rd, 2008 at 20:43
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Those dang Mormons!!!  Having marital relations with more than one woman while pretending to be married to em all, just aint right.  Now, having one wife and several mistresses that a man can all on at anytime, well, just seems to be more American!  And I guarantee that there is mo’ than 15,000 men practicing that Amerian style seximony that’s for dang sure.   These Mormon men just need to keep it more simple like us folk and they ain’t breakin no laws.  You can make kids with a woman without being marred to her, that’s for dang sure.

  3. Sunshine
    June 3rd, 2008 at 21:47
    Reply | Quote | #3

    They are the  leading polygamy advocacy group for mormons, not for Christians. Yes there is a difference :-)
    You might wanna check out http://nationalpolygamyadvocate.com/

  4. wives in need
    June 3rd, 2008 at 22:07
    #4
  5. Tully
    June 4th, 2008 at 02:43
    Reply | Quote | #5

    To throw another card in the mix, there are a whole lot of non-religious polygamous families out there as well.

  6. Polygamy needs clarification
    June 8th, 2008 at 23:55
    Reply | Quote | #6

    I think there ought to be a distinction made between  a religious marriage  and a legal marriage.  While polygamy means you have more than one spouse, plural spouses aren’t breaking the law unless they are registering all their marriages in their town or city halls and getting marriage certificates for them all.  I wonder how many of these polygamists, whatever variety they come in, are doing that.

  7. Brenda
    June 9th, 2008 at 03:07
    Reply | Quote | #7

    It seems to me that if the anti-polygamy laws can be as easily circumvented, the government might as well allow it. The mothers would no longer be considered single moms and the husbands would be held accountable financially. It’s a win-win for the IRS and the families.

  8. Tianna
    June 11th, 2008 at 13:51
    Reply | Quote | #8

    99 percent of polygamists do have mormon ties. That is where we came from.
    That fact is well known and the sooner the mormon church accepts it the sooner they can put down their prejudice against the polygamists.
      They are some of the worst enemies. Why? Because
    they know that it was them that gave up the principle to gain popularity with the world.
       It was their leaders that excommunicted my forefathers for living polygamy once they found out they did.
      
       It would be very interesting for people to know what really happpened in the those early days after the signing of the manifesto. The early leaders of the church did not give it up per say. And if the truth be known some of those leaders in one room would denounce polygamy and in the next room command some men to take additional wives as they did to my grandfather when he took his first plural wife which was my grandmother.
     
    There is a lot that is not known on this subject that the entire mormon church does not know. But it will soon.
     
     
    Tianna

  9. Tully
    June 11th, 2008 at 15:18
    Reply | Quote | #9

    99 percent of polygamists do have mormon ties…That fact is well known…

    Source, please? Because I know a few polygamists, and none of them are religious.

  10. Elijah Sue
    July 5th, 2008 at 08:10

    99 percent of polygamists do have mormon ties…That fact is well known…Source, please? Because I know a few polygamists, and none of them are religious

    I guess our family is in the 1 %
    No religious ties here.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500