Taliban ‘On Brink of Defeat’ in Afghanistan

June 3rd, 2008 By: Michael van der Galien | Tags:

After quite some good news coming out of Iraq in the last couple of months, there’s now some good news from Afghanistan: according to the commander of the British forces in that country, missions by special forces and air strikes by unmanned drones have “decapitated” the Taliban and brought the war in that country “to a tipping point.”

 The new “precise, surgical” tactics have killed scores of insurgent leaders and made it extremely difficult for Pakistan-based Taliban leaders to prosecute the campaign, according to Brig Mark Carleton-Smith.

In the past two years an estimated 7,000 Taliban have been killed, the majority in southern and eastern Afghanistan. But it is the “very effective targeted decapitation operations” that have removed “several echelons of commanders”.

This in turn has left the insurgents on the brink of defeat, the head of Task Force Helmand said.

“The Taliban are much weaker,” he said from 16 Air Assault Brigade headquarters in Lashkar Gah.

“The tide is clearly ebbing not flowing for them. Their chain of command is disrupted and they are short of weapons and ammunition.”

And there’s more good news: not only are Western military troops destroying the Taliban, Afghanis in Helmand province (one of the bulwarks of the Taliban) are increasingly turning against the Taliban as well. This while Taliban terrorists are dependent on locals for their food and water; no local support, means no water and food.

“I can therefore judge the Taliban insurgency a failure at the moment,” said Brig Carleton-Smith. “We have reached the tipping point.”

The task is now to regenerate the economy to win over the civilian population of Helmand, the base for 8,000 British soldiers.

Lashkar Gah, the provincial capital, appears to be a town on the cusp of an economic boom if security remains stable.

A new airport will be ready by the end of this year and a packaging factory by the end of next year.

This could enable the soil-rich “fruit basket of Afghanistan” to export its food.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Chris
    June 3rd, 2008 at 16:59
    Reply | Quote | #1

    LOL The Taliban almost defeated. They will never be defeated, they will fight for what is right, and it’s very nearly 100 British soldiers dead, in a year’s time, it will be 1,000.

  2. Jason
    June 3rd, 2008 at 17:28
    Reply | Quote | #2

    How revealing that you think the Taliban are fighting for "what is right" and that you “LOL” while predicting 900 more soldiers’ deaths.

    And to think we were told that the anti-war types ONLY objected to Iraq and that they didn’t EVER cheer for the enemy to win… :rolleyes:

  3. Rudi666
    June 3rd, 2008 at 21:38
    Reply | Quote | #3

    It’s nice that this UK general makes this claim while the NATO commander says Afghanistan is undermanned. Now which one is telling the truth and which one is spinning?
    http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,508021,00.html
    http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=15074

    Monday, June 02, 2008
    ISLAMABAD: In an interview to Spiegel, a German magazine, the outgoing ISAF Commander McNeill confessed having inadequate trained forces to effectively counter terrorism in Afghanistan. Nato has only 47,000 soldiers instead of a required strength of 400,000 with a shortfall of 260,000 men. Nato is practically running on reserve, as very few units can be used in combat situation. While neighboring countries want peace in the region, manning a volatile country with only 47,000 Nato troops and practically no well trained Afghan Army, the mission to bring peace to the region seems an uphill task, McNeill said.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500