Dems Lied re Iraq to Win Congress

Filed under: Democrats, Iraq, Politics — marc moore on May 23, 2008 @ 8:07 pm CEST

Jeff Emanuel’s excellent article about Representative Paul Kanjorski (D-PA) confirms what I’ve written for several months now:  that the Democrats were dishonest about their intentions - and ability - to put an end to the Iraq war.  Jeff says that Kanjorski has an “honesty problem” - too much of a good thing!  I wish there were a couple hundred more like him in Congress.

 

Kanjorski:

“I’ll tell you my impression. We really in this last election, when I say we…the Democrats, I think pushed it as far as we can to the end of the fleet, didn’t say it, but we implied it. That if we won the Congressional elections, we could stop the war. Now anybody was a good student of Government would know that wasn’t true. But you know, the temptation to want to win back the Congress, we sort of stretched the facts…and people ate it up.”

Emmanuel:

The impression the Democratic Congress gave during those minor-at-best wars over the continuation of the War was that it was simply incompetent. Reps. Pelosi, Hoyer, et al wanted to end the war as soon as possible — at least, that’s what they kept saying. Unfortunately for those who largely elected them on that basis, the best and brightest Democrats in elective office were simply unable to figure out any way to outsmart and outmaneuver the buffoon in the White House on the issues of wartime budget and policy, instead (inadvertently, I’m sure) ending every fight on the wrong side from their point of view, having yet again given the President every single thing he was asking for.

Now the mask slips — and with it comes an admitted level of condescension directed by those Congressional Democrats at those who were gullible enough to support them for something that they themselves knew could not be done.

That’s it all right.  By all rights they should be un-elected in just as abrupt a manner as they were thrust back into power.  Plainly they were ill-prepared to deal with the circumstances in which they found themselves floundering.

Fundamentally the issue is one of responsibility.  Leading means taking it on and doing what must be done, regardless of political expediency.  To their credit, Democrats have done relatively little to damage the war effort, though many have tried.  Succeeding would have been the height of irresponsibility.  Small wonder Pelosi and Reid always seemed to find a way to fail at the last.  Now we know why, thanks to Rep. Kanjorski.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

2 Comments »

  1. 1 A NEWT ONE

    May 23, 2008 @ 9:02 pm CEST

    The Leftinistra Lied About Iraq and President Bush…

    Damn. I knew this from Day One. I knew this when the very first communist backed “peace activists” first reared their ugly heads within weeks of 91101. I knew this when it became clear that if the political status quo were to remain in place in the a…

  2. 2 utsu

    May 23, 2008 @ 11:44 pm CEST

    As long as you complained when reps lied Re: Iraq to preserve power back when.

    Wait a second. Of course you didn’t. I, on the other hand, am as angered by this as I was by republican dishonesty in the past.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Interested: Democrats immediately pounced on her thin resume, Got to love that part of it, both Democrat front...
  • MichaelS: Here’s a quote from Palin a month ago: “As for that VP talk all the time, I’ll tell you, I still...
  • Imran: Wow, what a blunder.  I can’t believe McCain chose a VP just for the sole reason she is a lady.  She...
  • Lynne: Anybody seen the pix of Palin’s husband?  Yummy! We could use some real eye candy in the next...
  • Jay_C: Funny Bob,  Funny stuff… Perhaps they will take him water skiing…  Ding!….Ding! ...

Partners