Dick Morris on how McCain can win

Filed under: 2008 elections, Barack Obama, Democratic party, Dick Morris, Guest Post, John McCain, Politics, Republican Party, Republicans — Fausta on May 18, 2008 @ 3:43 pm CEST

Dick Morris, in today’s Washington Post: Obama Has the Upper Hand. But McCain Can Still Take Him.

To sum it up: A candidate who cannot get elected is being nominated by a party that cannot be defeated, while a candidate who is eminently electable is running as the nominee of a party doomed to defeat.In this environment, McCain can win by running to the center.

His base will be there for him; indeed, it will turn out in massive numbers. Wright has become the honorary chairman of McCain’s get-out-the-vote efforts. It would be nice to think that race isn’t a factor in American politics anymore, but it is. The growing fear of Obama, who remains something of an unknown, will drag every last white Republican male off the golf course to vote for McCain, and he will need no further laying-on of hands from either evangelical Christians or fiscal conservatives.

So McCain doesn’t have to spend a lot of time wooing his base. What he does need to do is reduce the size of the synapse over which independents and fearful Democrats need to pass in order to back his candidacy. If the synapse is wide, they will stay with Obama. But if they perceive McCain as an acceptable alternative, there is every chance that they will cross over to back him in November.

Who am I to disagree with Dick Morris, but the way I see it, McCain has an even bigger problem: many Republicans are assuming that McCain will win, and they are doing next to nothing to help him win, to get out the vote or even donating.

I’ve been discussing this with a friend who has been watching and participating in American politics for decades. Her appraisal is very somber when it comes to the cult of Obama and the upcoming Obamatopia (TM).
obama-cross-selma-church-s.jpg
She recognizes that McCain is against a mighty juggernaut (the hugely-funded Democrat party machinery, of course), but also against a cult-like following “that victimizes itself with politics of hatred”, in which propaganda “worms/ingratiates/infiltrates and then stays like a stubborn virulent disease with no fact overrides” (her words). At the same time, McCain is not stirring the Republicans.

Dick Morris says that McCain can win by moving to the center.

The question is, can McCain mobilize the country to effectively win over what has turned into an article of faith?

Cross-posted at Fausta’s blog

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

6 Comments »

  1. 1 Pug

    May 19, 2008 @ 2:58 am CEST

    So anyone who supports Obama is a cultist and a hater?  Is that supposed to be an argument of some kind?  Sorry, but it sounds like name-calling and not much more.

  2. 2 Jason

    May 19, 2008 @ 3:56 pm CEST

    When name-calling is all they have got, it’s all they can do. Take it as a positive sign that most anti-Obamans are still too intellectually lazy come up with anything more effective than just repeating the same 5th-grade level junk that they have been repeating for months.

    And I suppose I shouldn’t mention Dick Morris and toe-sucking. Whoops. I just did.

  3. 3 The Rude Dog

    May 19, 2008 @ 7:39 pm CEST

    admin: personal attacks, blatantly racist misinformation, and trackback spam all in one! nice try.

  4. 4 kritter

    May 19, 2008 @ 8:28 pm CEST

    And of course Dick Morris was amazingly successful as a presidential advisor—leading Clinton into the lion’s den with his sage advice.  Sarcasm off.

    The guy is a goofball, whose employment by Fox was a direct result of his eagerness to take his vendetta against the Clintons on the air.  Two years ago he thought Condi Rice could defeat Hillary.

  5. 5 Tully

    May 20, 2008 @ 12:30 am CEST

    And I suppose I shouldn’t mention Dick Morris and toe-sucking. Whoops. I just did.

    Well, not if you want to live up to your own standards. Though personally I think the initial response to any Dick Morris column should be, "Woof! Woof woof!" It can’t be examined for actual content after you get the really fun cheap shot out of the way.

  6. 6 The Rude Dog

    May 21, 2008 @ 12:34 am CEST

    Admin, you cannot refute the comments you deleted. The only personal attack is you calling me a racist. Thanks for demonstrating the oonly tactic of the Obama campaign.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • Michael Merritt: Huh?  I posted a link to both transcripts, and a lot more context than a lot of people would.
  • Rudi666: Sully has a mp3 and transcript from the actual church, lets talk about what was actually said.
  • John: I have very good feelings about President Gul’s visit to Yerevan. However we look at it one thing is...
  • John: It is truly amazing, if not altogether funny, how you guys thrive on creating something that actually is not...
  • Michael Merritt: I didn’t excuse Reverend Wright, and in fact said it was the right thing to scrutinize him....

Partners