ElectionSnark (Special Political Dictionary Edition)

May 17th, 2008 By: Jason, Managing Editor | Tags:

“Apology”, n. Formal statement required from any candidate who criticizes another candidate or who’s supporters criticize another candidate.

“Basher”, n. Any source that reports a negative story about a candidate that the writer likes.

“Biased”, adj. Any source that disagrees with the writer.

“Blue-collar”, adj. (R) Church-going salt of the earth. (D) Industrial union member.

“Bush”, n. (R) Albatross. (D) Hitler.

“Campaign finance reform”, n. Government regulation designed to cut off funds to the other party.

“Cheerleader”, adj. Any source that reports a positive story about a candidate that the writer dislikes.

“Diversity”, n. (R) Many versions of the same Bible. (D) Many colors, one viewpoint.

“Diplomacy”, n. (R) Appeasement. (D) Magic wand. (Syn: “negotiations”)

“Elitist”, adj. Educated.

“Endorsement”, n. Meaningless statement of support from an ex-candidate who is now angling for a appointed office instead of elected office.

“Free speech”, n. (R) Vital right of individuals to preach the Bible. (D) Vital right of individuals to comply with the campus speech code.

“Illegal immigrant”, n. (R) Dirty brown invader. (D) Potential Democratic voter.

“Landslide”, n. Any election the preferred candidate won.

“Middle class”, adj. (R) Saints who deserve tax cuts. (D) Saints who deserve tax cuts and handouts.

“Neocon”, n. Any person who disagrees with Glenn Greenwald.

“Objective”, adj. Any source that agrees with the writer. (Syn: “calls it as it is“)

“Poor”, adj. (R) Unable to provide campaign contributions. (D) Available pool of foot soldiers for marches and mass chanting; abstract target group for government programs designed to maintain the pool.

“Public servant”, n. (R) Leech. (D) Government union member.

“Racist”, adj. Anyone who disagrees with a racial minority candidate. (Syn: “bitter”)

“Rich”, adj. (R) The Deity with a checkbook. (D) The Devil with a checkbook.

“Sexist”, adj. Anyone who disagrees with a woman candidate.

“Sheep”, n. Anyone who thinks Ron Paul is a complete loonybird. (Syn: “hates the Constitution”, “hates freedom”)

“Spammer”, n. Ron Paul supporter.

“Squeaker”, n. Any election the preferred candidate lost.

“Swiftboat”, v. (R) Expose a pleasant truth about a candidate. (D) Expose an unpleasant truth about a candidate.

“Warmonger”, n. Any person who disagrees with Glenn Greenwald.

“White collar”, adj. (R) Professional. (D) Government union member.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Claudia
    May 17th, 2008 at 20:11
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Ohhh fun! Let me have a go:

    Civil Liberties: (R) The right to walk into a preeschool with a loaded gun (D) The right to walk into a preschool dressed only in chaps.

    Ron Paul: (R) A goofy spoiler (D) Democracy in action

    Ralph Nader: (R) Democracy in action (D) A goofy spoiler

    Unwarranted attack: Any attack made on me

    Will of the voters: The standard that shows me as a winner

    Vital Demographic: The one that votes for me (syn: Real Americans™)

    Government interference: When the government prevents me from doing something I like.

    Leadership: When the government prevents you from doing something I don’t like.

     

  2. Interested
    May 18th, 2008 at 07:09
    Reply | Quote | #2

    Al Gore:  (R) Not even an Alpha Dog.  (D) The Best we have!
    Howard Dean; (R) LMAO!   (D) The Best we have!
    John Kerry: (R) Waffle house  (D) The Best we have!
    Hillary Clinton: (R) It’s a Cinton  (D) Even we’re not saying she’s the best we have.

  3. Hoot Of The Day « QC Examiner
    May 18th, 2008 at 22:28
    #3
  4. bible dictionary
    June 12th, 2008 at 23:13
    #4

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500