Edwards to Endorse Obama (Updated)

Filed under: 2008 elections, Barack Obama, John Edwards — Claudia, Assistant Editor on May 14, 2008 @ 10:46 pm CEST

The Huffington Post is reporting on growing speculation that Edwards is set to endorse Barack Obama tonight. Edwards has already said that Obama is the likely nominee. Obama’s campaign has apparently announced a major endorsement at a rally in Michigan today.

As a state that could support Obama in the fall but requires some friendly gestures due to their delegate woes, and also as a state where the economic issues Edwards talks about are close to the hearts of voters, would be a great place to make such an announcement.

It’s still a rumor for now, but please bear with me. I’ve spent the day reading quotes and watching video of uneducated hicks Real Americans™ saying they can’t support Obama because he’s Muslim, or not “All-American” or just plain because he’s black, I need some encouragement.

UPDATE: The New York Times and ABC are confirming the endorsement.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

7 Comments »

  1. 1 George

    May 14, 2008 @ 11:08 pm CEST

    So, Mr. Edwards has finally decided to endorse Obama, now that the race is over and his endorsement means nothing.  Who the hell cares?

  2. 2 James

    May 14, 2008 @ 11:12 pm CEST

    "watching video of uneducated hicks Real Americans™ saying they can’t support Obama because he’s….black, I need some encouragement."
     
    Scary. Yes, he’s half Kenyan….and half Irish.

    I guess the Irish part is too much for these "simpletons" to understand.

    They’d probably look at me (I went to Nassau and developed a deep tan) and give me the cold shoulder, too.

    VERY bright people (NOT!!!). 

  3. 3 C Stanley

    May 14, 2008 @ 11:19 pm CEST

    I imagine it must be a rude awakening to some Democrats to know that not ALL of the uneducated, bigoted hicks in America are Republicans. Of course amnesia will strike in the general election and every newsclip and youtube of ignorant voters will be once again presumed to represent a major swath of the Republican base.

  4. 4 politicjock

    May 14, 2008 @ 11:19 pm CEST

    George,It actually means a lot because Obama is going to get Edwards pledged delegates.

  5. 5 Tully

    May 15, 2008 @ 1:03 am CEST

    The Edwards pledged delegates must vote for Edwards on the first round, then they’re free to vote for whom they wish. Why you want that majority in hand for the first vote–there’s no second round then. IF there was a second round of voting, they could then vote for Obama.

  6. 6 Just Me

    May 15, 2008 @ 6:45 am CEST

    Actually, politicjock since the Democratic party is a private party, the delegates themselves will probably choose in a tie where they’ll go. Edwards is just suggesting that they go to Obama. In reality, they can still do whatever they want. All a "pledged" delegate is saying is that at the Democratic convention, this is who their district said to vote for. Even then it’s not set in stone. It’s the same system as the "electors" but a little more lose.

  7. 7 Tully

    May 15, 2008 @ 2:28 pm CEST

    Yep. I misstated. There is NO law or rule that says a pledged delegate MUST vote for whom they’re pledged to, and right up until the convention a candidate can even "fire" any of his own delegates he thinks will vote the wrong way. Guess right, tke a vote from someone else. Guess wrong, take a vote from yourself.

    Edwards can suggest, but the delegates decide for themselves.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment


 

Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • R: David, Thanks for the information on Afyon. It is useful to remember that the Armenians were deported from all...
  • Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief: The Armenian genocide is an incontestable fact. No it’s not, and the...
  • Kemal: Hey  David, how many scholars that conclude no genocide occurred are funded by Armenia? None.  Does that...
  • RRRocks: Perhaps what many who dont get the puma anger fail to understand is how they believe that the election was...
  • Elif: David, we are running in vicious cycles here. First you indicated that East Anatolia was the land of Armenians...

Partners