Edwards to Endorse Obama (Updated)

May 14th, 2008 By: Claudia, Assistant Editor | Tags:

The Huffington Post is reporting on growing speculation that Edwards is set to endorse Barack Obama tonight. Edwards has already said that Obama is the likely nominee. Obama’s campaign has apparently announced a major endorsement at a rally in Michigan today.

As a state that could support Obama in the fall but requires some friendly gestures due to their delegate woes, and also as a state where the economic issues Edwards talks about are close to the hearts of voters, would be a great place to make such an announcement.

It’s still a rumor for now, but please bear with me. I’ve spent the day reading quotes and watching video of uneducated hicks Real Americans™ saying they can’t support Obama because he’s Muslim, or not “All-American” or just plain because he’s black, I need some encouragement.

UPDATE: The New York Times and ABC are confirming the endorsement.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. George
    May 14th, 2008 at 23:08
    Reply | Quote | #1

    So, Mr. Edwards has finally decided to endorse Obama, now that the race is over and his endorsement means nothing.  Who the hell cares?

  2. James
    May 14th, 2008 at 23:12
    Reply | Quote | #2

    "watching video of uneducated hicks Real Americans™ saying they can’t support Obama because he’s….black, I need some encouragement."
     
    Scary. Yes, he’s half Kenyan….and half Irish.

    I guess the Irish part is too much for these "simpletons" to understand.

    They’d probably look at me (I went to Nassau and developed a deep tan) and give me the cold shoulder, too.

    VERY bright people (NOT!!!). 

  3. C Stanley
    May 14th, 2008 at 23:19
    Reply | Quote | #3

    I imagine it must be a rude awakening to some Democrats to know that not ALL of the uneducated, bigoted hicks in America are Republicans. Of course amnesia will strike in the general election and every newsclip and youtube of ignorant voters will be once again presumed to represent a major swath of the Republican base.

  4. politicjock
    May 14th, 2008 at 23:19
    Reply | Quote | #4

    George,It actually means a lot because Obama is going to get Edwards pledged delegates.

  5. Tully
    May 15th, 2008 at 01:03
    Reply | Quote | #5

    The Edwards pledged delegates must vote for Edwards on the first round, then they’re free to vote for whom they wish. Why you want that majority in hand for the first vote–there’s no second round then. IF there was a second round of voting, they could then vote for Obama.

  6. Just Me
    May 15th, 2008 at 06:45
    Reply | Quote | #6

    Actually, politicjock since the Democratic party is a private party, the delegates themselves will probably choose in a tie where they’ll go. Edwards is just suggesting that they go to Obama. In reality, they can still do whatever they want. All a "pledged" delegate is saying is that at the Democratic convention, this is who their district said to vote for. Even then it’s not set in stone. It’s the same system as the "electors" but a little more lose.

  7. Tully
    May 15th, 2008 at 14:28
    Reply | Quote | #7

    Yep. I misstated. There is NO law or rule that says a pledged delegate MUST vote for whom they’re pledged to, and right up until the convention a candidate can even "fire" any of his own delegates he thinks will vote the wrong way. Guess right, tke a vote from someone else. Guess wrong, take a vote from yourself.

    Edwards can suggest, but the delegates decide for themselves.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500