Hating Hillary

May 14th, 2008 By: marc moore | Tags:

AmericaBlog exemplifies Democrats’ inherent loathing of the democratic process. John has picked his candidate; therefore, no one else is allowed to express their opinions or compete against his anointed one.

IT’S NOT CLOSE. YOU FREAKING LOST THE NOMINATION, WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU?

Good God. What is wrong with her? The Clintons and their campaign staff don’t give a damn that they are now hurting our electoral chances in the fall against McCain and against the Republicans in Congress.

Their campaign isn’t happening in some vacuum, and they know it. Our candidates can’t fundraise because of her. Obama can’t focus on McCain because of her. Obama is wasting money on HER, rather than spending it on McCain, because of her. EMILY’s List, and AFSCME, and the American Federation of Teachers and others are wasting their members’ money on her now-failed race - money that they could be spending, should be spending, on other real races, races that haven’t already lost. She can’t win, the math says she lost the nomination, but she doesn’t give a damn. She’s going to stay in the race like some spoiled hateful egotistical brat.

What is it that Obama supporters are so afraid of? If he’s the better candidate he will continue to win out. If he’s not, he doesn’t deserve the nomination.

Is there some terrible skeleton in Obama’s closet that’s going to spring out all of a sudden? I doubt it; that’s what’s so mystifying about the way the far left is demonizing a woman who they would be fawning over in any other circumstance.

To the extent that political candidates can be judged according to who supports them undecided voters should be wary of Obama. Consider that at one time 70+% of Kos readers supported him…

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Claudia
    May 14th, 2008 at 18:13
    Reply | Quote | #1

    AmericaBlog exemplifies Democrats’ inherent loathing of the democratic process.

    That phrase perfectly exemplifies your irrational hatred of Democrats and why you are the furthest thing to moderate this blog has to offer. Not that liberals hating freedom and other gems hadn’t already proved that.

    Ah yes, Democrats showed their "inherent loathing of the democratic process" by voting in record numbers, by the millions upon millions, this primary season. Oh why do they hate America so?

  2. Jason
    May 14th, 2008 at 19:41
    Reply | Quote | #2

    John has picked his candidate; therefore, no one else is allowed to express their opinions or compete against his anointed one

    I don’t think you have your facts straight, Marc.

    The rant on AmericaBlog is definitely over the top. That said, they aren’t the ones actually censoring those they disagree with. That was a pro-Hillary blog that did that.

    And while John’s anti-Hillary rant is definitely an overreaction, it is basically the same as what gets said about Obama and his supporters around here every day, including by YOU.

  3. Tully
    May 14th, 2008 at 20:04
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Wow, True Believer political bloggers going histrionically over the top while trying to whip up a base-frenzy. Never seen that before.

    To the extent that political candidates can be judged according to who supports them undecided voters should be wary of Obama.

    I’d say that applies across the board. You can find nutjobs hyperbolically rooting for any candidate. It says a lot more about those particular nutjobs than it can ever say about the candidate. Unless, of course, the candidate is openly embracing and encourging them.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500