West Virginia Predictions

May 13th, 2008 By: Claudia, Assistant Editor | Tags:

Today is the West Virginia primary, and I would like to hear your predicitons. Except this time, I’m less interested in numers than media discourse. Clinton will destroy Obama in this state, she consistently polls around 40 points above him (personally I’m predicting some 35 points difference and somewhat lower turnout compared to other states). It will be a massacre, no question.

But what will the media do? Will they acknowledge this as a “last throes” moment, or will they try, because of their eternal love of the horserace, try to push a new narrative whereby Clinton has a chance for a comeback from waaaaay behind?

Personally, I’m going to ignore previous experience and bet on the media having good judgement in this case. They will breathlessly report the numbers of course, they will beg to be reported. The margin of victory will be huge for Clinton. I think the media narrative will generally carry the thesis that yes Clinton won bigtime, but that it’s probably too little too late.

On the other hand there will be a lot of disussion about blue-collar voters (the new code for low education whites, the same way “urban” means black) not trusting Obama, and what that could mean for him in the general election (which I think the media will still presume as him being the candidate for). It’s a valid concern, especially because in American politics, apparently these voters are the “real Americans” (more on the political taboo of acknowledging the highly educated as Real American™ in another post) and of course because they are very very numerous, not a demographic you can afford to write off (neither are blacks, if you’re a Democrat, but that hasn’t been discussed in this cycle).

So my prediction is on the media NOT trying to jumpstart the horserace but spending a lot of time discussing electability.

You?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. wj
    May 13th, 2008 at 21:55
    Reply | Quote | #1

    OK, here’s a prediction: Clinton wins big.  But not by anything like 40%, or even 35%. 

    Since Obama does substantially better than the polls had been predicting, the media talks about the huge strides he made, rather than the fact of the loss.  Another triumph for managing expectations — but not for the Clinton campaign.

    Further, the media expresses great surprise at the fact that the way delegates are selected means that Clinton comes out of West Virginia having made in minimal dent in Obama’s delegate lead.  (Duh!)

    Attention then returns to the on-going stream of super-delegates declaring for Obama.

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500