Fighting Breaks Out Near Beirut

Filed under: Middle East — Michael van der Galien, Editor-in-Chief on May 12, 2008 @ 12:26 pm CEST

The situation in Lebanon continues to deteriorate. Fierce fighting has now broken out in the mountains east of the country’s capital, Beirut. The fighting is, at this moment, taking place between supporters of the pro-Western government and supporters and members of the Shiite terrorist organization Hezbollah.

Remarkably, the New York Times actually points out in the article linked to above that Hezbollah is supported by Iran.

So, it is deteriorating in so far that the violence seems to be spreading. However, there is also good news. The situation in Beirut is improving. It appears that Hezbollah’s leaders have told their gunmen to leave the capital. This leads many people to believe and hope that a truce is in the works.

That’s the only good news. The bad news is far worse. As said, the violence is spreading. Especially to villages in the Eastern part of Lebanon. Not only that, however, the good news isn’t very good either considering the fact that many people want the government to accept Hezbollah’s offer for a truce. This offer would be highly beneficial for Hezbollah, and it would be quite bad for the government and therefore for the West.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.


Editorial Staff

Editor-in-Chief: Michael van der Galien
Managing Editor: Jason
Assistant Editor: Claudia



 



Listen to PoliGazette Radio on internet talk radio




 

Proud member of Moderate Blog Network, a FeedBurner Network.

Recent Comments

  • David: Would somebody please delete the double post?
  • David: I think that her biggest plus is the fact that her Alaska administration has a reputation for successful...
  • David: I think that her biggest plus is the fact that her Alaska administration has a reputation for successful...
  • Kevin H: I’m comming in to this late. But I’ll start off with inexperience. I think that your right...
  • Mikeh: "To me the idea that someone could have their finger on the button that would give credence to the most...

Partners