Filed under: 2008 elections, Feature — Jason, Managing Editor on May 9, 2008 @ 2:56 pm CEST
Superdelegate switches sides to prove his loyalty.
More whining about Obama’s whining. McCain whines. Clintonistas whine. Observers whine about the whining over the whining. Whining experts predict more whining to come unless whining overwhelms the whiners’ propensity to whine about whining.
The media cites low “political capital” as reason for Jenna Bush’s private wedding. Jenna Bush cites a preference not to invite the media to her wedding.
Newly revealed memos expose Clinton’s dishonesty. Other newly revealed memos expose sky’s blueness.
Some economists say something, others say nothing.
Hillary for VP movement grows. Obama campaign begins hiring food tasters.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly
or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements.
Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or
that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat
slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email only.
1 Interested
May 9, 2008 @ 8:55 pm CESTBoy sounds just like what Libby got convicted for. Michael will probably come along and tell us why she should have gone free.
2 Interested
May 10, 2008 @ 4:02 am CESTand what has to be the most apt title yet this election season.
3 C Stanley
May 10, 2008 @ 2:07 pm CEST<blockquote>Boy sounds just like what Libby got convicted for. </blockquote>
The comparison to Libby is pretty apt, as she ought to hold the copyright on the "I don’t recall" defense that he used. Back in the day when I used to listen to Rush Limbaugh he had a great parody of her testimony, set to the tune of "Try to Remember". I don’t know how many times she gave a variation the response "I don’t recall" but it was astounding that someone could respond that way and expect people to believe that she had no memory of all of the events she was being questioned about.
That episode plus the missing Rose Law firm records turning up (coincidentally, I’m sure, this was soon after the statute of limitations had run out) put an end to any benefit of the doubt that I could possibly extend to her about her credibility.