<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ElectionSnark (9 May)</title>
	<link>http://poligazette.com/2008/05/09/electionsnark-9-may/</link>
	<description>Politics and world events from a moderately liberal and conservative perspective</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: C Stanley</title>
		<link>http://poligazette.com/2008/05/09/electionsnark-9-may/#comment-48958</link>
		<dc:creator>C Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 12:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://poligazette.com/2008/05/09/electionsnark-9-may/#comment-48958</guid>
		<description>&#60;blockquote&#62;Boy sounds just like what Libby got convicted for.  &#60;/blockquote&#62;
The comparison to Libby is pretty apt, as she ought to hold the copyright on the &#34;I don't recall&#34; defense that he used. Back in the day when I used to listen to Rush Limbaugh he had a great parody of her testimony, set to the tune of &#34;Try to Remember&#34;. I don't know how many times she gave a variation the response &#34;I don't recall&#34; but it was astounding that someone could respond that way and expect people to believe that she had no memory of all of the events she was being questioned about.

That episode plus the missing Rose Law firm records turning up (coincidentally, I'm sure, this was soon after the statute of limitations had run out) put an end to any benefit of the doubt that I could possibly extend to her about her credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;blockquote&gt;Boy sounds just like what Libby got convicted for.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;<br />
The comparison to Libby is pretty apt, as she ought to hold the copyright on the &quot;I don&#8217;t recall&quot; defense that he used. Back in the day when I used to listen to Rush Limbaugh he had a great parody of her testimony, set to the tune of &quot;Try to Remember&quot;. I don&#8217;t know how many times she gave a variation the response &quot;I don&#8217;t recall&quot; but it was astounding that someone could respond that way and expect people to believe that she had no memory of all of the events she was being questioned about.</p>
<p>That episode plus the missing Rose Law firm records turning up (coincidentally, I&#8217;m sure, this was soon after the statute of limitations had run out) put an end to any benefit of the doubt that I could possibly extend to her about her credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interested</title>
		<link>http://poligazette.com/2008/05/09/electionsnark-9-may/#comment-48854</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 02:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://poligazette.com/2008/05/09/electionsnark-9-may/#comment-48854</guid>
		<description>and what has to be the most apt title yet this election season.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wowowow.com/post/everything-i-hate-about-myself-i-see-hillary-judy-bachrach" rel="nofollow"&gt;Everything I Hate About Myself I See in Hillary, by Judy Bachrach&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and what has to be the most apt title yet this election season.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.wowowow.com/post/everything-i-hate-about-myself-i-see-hillary-judy-bachrach" rel="nofollow">Everything I Hate About Myself I See in Hillary, by Judy Bachrach</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interested</title>
		<link>http://poligazette.com/2008/05/09/electionsnark-9-may/#comment-48762</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://poligazette.com/2008/05/09/electionsnark-9-may/#comment-48762</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A decade before Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton admitted fudging the truth during the presidential campaign, federal prosecutors quietly assembled hundreds of pages of evidence suggesting she concealed information and misled a federal grand jury …
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Boy sounds just like what Libby got convicted for.  Michael will probably come along and tell us why she should have gone free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A decade before Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton admitted fudging the truth during the presidential campaign, federal prosecutors quietly assembled hundreds of pages of evidence suggesting she concealed information and misled a federal grand jury …
</p></blockquote>
<p>Boy sounds just like what Libby got convicted for.  Michael will probably come along and tell us why she should have gone free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
