ElectionSnark (8 May)
Hillary Clinton cites wide base of appeal as reason to continue campaign. Her key piece of evidence? The minority of votes she has received.
Democrat partisans offer Hillary governorships, leadership positions, kittens, donuts, anything to get her to drop out. Next step: A donkey’s head in her bed?
Blogger who predicted that 2008 elections would be canceled by dictatorial Republican president nonetheless remains deeply interested in capturing the White House for Democrats in those same elections.
Obama’s true weakness exposed.
How bad is it when even George McGovern thinks your campaign is too far gone?
Media (and ElectionSnark) desperately trying to find something…anything McCain-related to talk about.
Obama campaign manager claims that the only reason Hillary lost but didn’t lose by enough was because Rush Limbaugh was telling Republicans to vote for Democrats, but sometimes for one and other times for the other, in a show of strength designed to weaken the Democratic nominee enough to be defeated by the stronger but still weak Republican nominee. You dizzy yet?
Some think that the Rev. Wright story was not given enough attention. Sure, neither was Britney Spears or Paris Hilton. Damn media, covering up all those important stories…
Michigan Democrats proudly announce an agreement that changes absolutely nothing and binds absolutely no one.
News flash: Greenwald still hates “neocons” and, well, pretty much everyone. This brings me to a study reporting that conservatives are generally happier than liberals which begs a methodological question: How do you measure happiness among a group full of Greenwalds who only get joy from being completely pissed off?
This brings me to a study reporting that conservatives are generally happier than liberals …
Sure, and it’s not terribly hard to understand why. It’s a simple matter to feel happy most of the time when you and yours are doing fine and those are the only people you care about.
I noticed that you cut that part of the post off of your quote. Must have run afoul of yet another one of those lefty speech code thingies….
Right, Kathy. Or was that one of Greenwald’s sock puppets? So hard to tell…
Thanks for confirming what I said about many liberals basing their entire worldview on resentment and hatred of anyone that disagrees with them.
I notice you cut that part off of your quotation. Did I run afoul of one of those lefty speech codes again???
Anyway, you should stop being so bitter since you have neither guns nor religion to cling to.
lol and the severe lack of fund raising
<i>I notice you cut that part off of your quotation. Did I run afoul of one of those lefty speech codes again???</i>
I’ve read this six times and still don’t know what it means. But then, you probably don’t know, either.
As a separate point, the comment above yours, which is labeled as mine, is not mine. The last two lines are your words, not mine, but the header says Kathy not Jason. But it’s not my comment. Just thought I’d mention that.
Anyway, you should stop being so bitter since you have neither guns nor religion to cling to.
How do you know what I cling to or don’t cling to? You’re telling me what I believe, Jason. Isn’t that against one of your rules?
I seem to get under your skin more than I intend to, Jason. Perhaps someday you will agree that it’s possible to have a vigorous, even heated, argument without this venom. More unlikely understandings have come to pass, so I’ll keep trying.