Filed under: Education, Intellectualism — marc moore on May 6, 2008 @ 4:57 am CEST
From the Wall Street Journal:
Often it seems as though American higher education exists only to provide gag material for the outside world. The latest spectacle is an Ivy League professor threatening to sue her students because, she claims, their "anti-intellectualism" violated her civil rights.
Priya Venkatesan taught English at Dartmouth College. She maintains that some of her students were so unreceptive of "French narrative theory" that it amounted to a hostile working environment.
Ah, the old "Disagree with me and I’ll sue you for being a facist anti-intellectual" trick. I guess defending the ideas that she expected to imprint on her students was too much for the good instructor.
Pithy quote from Venkatesan that says it all:
"Scientific facts do not correspond to a natural reality but conform to a social construct."
Hilarious. More from the WSJ:
The remarkable thing about the Venkatesan affair, to me, is that her students cared enough to argue. Normally they would express their boredom with the material by answering emails on their laptops or falling asleep. But here they staged a rebellion, a French Counter-Revolution against Professor Defarge. Maybe, despite the professor’s best efforts, there’s life in American colleges yet.
Indeed. Perhaps the new anti-intellectualism that the would-be elites fear so much is simply a generation of people who are willing and able to think for themselves.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
PoliGazette Comments Policy
PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree.
Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate
these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors.
Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue
publicly with editors regarding the comments
policy may be banned from commenting further.
(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or
willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that
respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should
not be posted.
(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.
(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional
reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.
(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not
include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement
the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.
Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors
by email.
1 Michael Merritt
May 6, 2008 @ 7:12 am CEST"She maintains that some of her students were so unreceptive of "French narrative theory" that it amounted to a hostile working environment."
Students being unreceptive of an academic concept? And she’s surprised by this? I’ve gone to college for long enough to know that this isn’t far from normal.
2 Black Shards, In Your Eyes, Blinding » Shocker: College Faculty Mostly Fund Democrats
May 6, 2008 @ 2:46 pm CEST[…] a little more vetting would keep professors like Ayers and Priya Venkatesan from ruining young […]
3 David
May 6, 2008 @ 9:01 pm CESTOne of the main things that I learned at university was that every course which described itself as "critical" basically expected the students to sit and uncritically receive leftist dogma.
If given free rein, postmodernism will abolish scholarship.
4 Chris
May 6, 2008 @ 11:26 pm CESTWas this article a joke?
5 Mayuresh Gaikwad
May 7, 2008 @ 11:54 pm CESTWhat a loser! I previously thought this article was a joke, but some googling revealed otherwise!
I think her students were unreceptive of French narrative theory because she narrated it in French. Anyways, I am yet to understand the meaning of post-modernism, because the latest thoughts are “modern”!