PoliGazette » Using Oil Reserves to Lower Gas Prices

Using Oil Reserves to Lower Gas Prices

Filed under: General News — marc moore on May 2, 2008 @ 5:31 pm CEST

Texas Congressman Chet Edwards (D) wants to use the U.S.’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve to lower prices at the gas pump. Needless to say, I think this is a bad idea, for reasons I list below.

He says the increased supply would help halt rising gas prices which are predicted to hit $4 per gallon by summer.

“At a time when costs for groceries, gas, health care, and education keep rising, releasing oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve is a common sense first step that will help ease the burden for working families and businesses struggling to make ends meet in today’s economy,” said Edwards.

First, the purpose of a “strategic” reserve is not to manipulate the price of consumer-oriented petroleum products, it’s to have - full - when and if an emergency occurs.

Second, lower prices encourage consumption and discourage conservation, which is the exact opposite of what we want to do.

Third, Congressional mandates for lower fuel prices actively discourage investment in alternate energy sources that require significant capital to bring to market.

While draining the reserve is by definition only a short-term ploy, it nonetheless sends a message to energy investors that their “Congressional risk” is higher than it ought to be.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or willfully misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid use of vulgar language as well as racial, ethnic, or religious slurs.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email.