In Favor of Keeping Gas Tax

April 30th, 2008 By: marc moore | Tags:

Federal gas taxes help support America’s transportation system, one in which roadways all over the nation are being repaired and upgraded after a period of significant neglect.  It’s unpleasant to pay the $0.18 extra per gallon, yet there are worse things.

Thomas Friedman has this to say about the unholy alliance of McCain & Clinton that embraces the foolhardy notion of removing the federal excise tax on gasoline for this summer’s rush to the pumps:

It is great to see that we finally have some national unity on energy policy. Unfortunately, the unifying idea is so ridiculous, so unworthy of the people aspiring to lead our nation, it takes your breath away.

Hillary Clinton has decided to line up with John McCain in pushing to suspend the federal excise tax on gasoline, 18.4 cents a gallon, for this summer’s travel season. This is not an energy policy. This is money laundering: we borrow money from China and ship it to Saudi Arabia and take a little cut for ourselves as it goes through our gas tanks. What a way to build our country.

When the summer is over, we will have increased our debt to China, increased our transfer of wealth to Saudi Arabia and increased our contribution to global warming for our kids to inherit.

Friedman is a day behind Paul Krugman, who partially identified the problem with this “plan” yesterday:

Why doesn’t cutting the gas tax this summer make sense? It’s Econ 101 tax incidence theory: if the supply of a good is more or less unresponsive to the price, the price to consumers will always rise until the quantity demanded falls to match the quantity supplied. Cut taxes, and all that happens is that the pretax price rises by the same amount. The McCain gas tax plan is a giveaway to oil companies, disguised as a gift to consumers.

But as Friedman says, the problem isn’t that oil companies might raise prices to market levels and hence make more money - it’s the fact that the federal government’s already bloated budget is hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars out of balance and this proposal, kind as it might seem to drivers, can only exacerbate the fiscal mess that’s been created by the Bush administration.

There’s another aspect to the issue as well.  Friedman again:

…here’s what’s scary: our problem is so much worse than you think. We have no energy strategy. If you are going to use tax policy to shape energy strategy then you want to raise taxes on the things you want to discourage — gasoline consumption and gas-guzzling cars — and you want to lower taxes on the things you want to encourage — new, renewable energy technologies. We are doing just the opposite.

The truth is that a sustained period of high gas prices will - not would, but will - be a good thing for America because higher prices encourage investment in other forms of energy that are not as likely to be controlled by people who actively detest everything America stands for.

Friedman again:

The McCain-Clinton gas holiday proposal is a perfect example of what energy expert Peter Schwartz of Global Business Network describes as the true American energy policy today: “Maximize demand, minimize supply and buy the rest from the people who hate us the most.”

Sounds like a real winner of a policy, doesn’t it?

Of the candidates still in the running for the presidency, only Barack Obama has the sense to see that suspending the gas tax is a temporary, feel-good, “vote-for-me-because-I’m-nice” position that hurts people in the long run.

Good for him.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • NewsVine
  • TailRank
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  1. Bob
    April 30th, 2008 at 22:45
    Reply | Quote | #1

    Very good article…  I agree that the gas tax should be increased to discourage gluttony..  and why does it cost $5 for a compact fluorescent light bulb?  We all want to "save the planet" ..but does a consumer justify buying a CFLB at $5 when they can buy 30 incandescent.

  2. redfish
    May 1st, 2008 at 03:50
    Reply | Quote | #2

    marc,

    Thats part of the reason why Perot proposed a large gas tax increase in 1992, he wanted to use the money to both help pay down the debt and invest in alternative energy and infrastructure like mass transit.

  3. KYJurisDoctor
    May 2nd, 2008 at 20:27
    Reply | Quote | #3

    The gas tax rebate or holiday (or whatever you may want to call it) is nothing but political pandering at its WORST!

PoliGazette Comments Policy

PoliGazette encourages comments from all viewpoints, especially those that disagree. Comments submitted must, however, adhere to the following standards. Comments that violate these standards may be edited or deleted without notice at the sole discretion of the editors. Commenters who repeatedly or egregiously violate these standards or who attempt to argue publicly with editors regarding the comments policy may be banned from commenting further.

(1) Comments should address the substantive content of the post. Comments that repeatedly or blatantly misrepresent the content of the post or of others' comments are not welcome. Comments that respond to something other than which the contributor or commenter may have said are irrelevant and should not be posted.

(2) Comments should avoid vulgarity as well as racial, ethnic, religious, or sexual bigotry.

(3) Comments should not personally attack the character, personal integrity, or professional reputation of any PoliGazette contributor or of other commenters.

(4) Comments should reflect the contributions of the commenters themselves and should not include extensive cut-and-paste reproductions of others' words except insofar as necessary to supplement the commenter's own arguments. Link spam, trackback spam, and propaganda spam will be instantly deleted.

(5) Public figures are considered open to all substantive criticism of their policies and statements. Comments that present objectively false factual information about public figures (i.e. "Obama is a Muslim") or that attack public figures by attacking their families are not welcome. Comments that merely repeat slogans for or against a candidate without engaging in substantive comment are not welcome.

Questions or challenges to these policies or their application should be directed to the editors by email only.


Warning: is_writable() [function.is-writable]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(error_log) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/p6525pol:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/p6525pol/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 500